Literature DB >> 29381497

Comparison of Vaginal Axis in Women Who Have Undergone Hysterectomy Versus Women With an Intact Uterus.

Daniel D Lee1, Evan S Siegelman2, Wynne Y Chua3, Lily A Arya1, Heidi S Harvie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare vaginal axis and posterior cul-de-sac measurements in women who have undergone hysterectomy and women with an intact uterus.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing magnetic resonance imaging findings in women who had undergone hysterectomy with women with an intact uterus. The primary outcome was change in the upper, middle, and lower vaginal axes relative to the pelvic inclination correction system line. Secondary outcomes included angles between the upper-middle and middle-lower vagina, depth of the posterior cul-de-sac, and total vaginal length.
RESULTS: In the hysterectomy group, the middle vaginal axis was significantly more anterior as compared with the intact uterus group (61.3 degrees ± 12.7 vs 49.4 degrees ± 23.6, P = 0.01). The upper-middle and the middle-lower vaginal angles were significantly more obtuse in the hysterectomy group than the intact uterus group (112.3 degrees ± 28.7 vs 69.3 degrees ± 56.6, P = 0.01 and 145.4 degrees ± 13.2 vs 130.9 degrees ± 29.7, P = 0.02, respectively). The mean depth of the posterior cul-de-sac and the total vaginal length were significantly shorter in the hysterectomy group than the intact uterus group (5.5 mm ± 7.6 vs 21.8 mm ± 11.9, P < 0.0001 and 78.7 mm ± 3.9 vs 100 mm ± 15.9, P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal anatomy of women who have undergone hysterectomy differs significantly from that of women with an intact uterus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29381497     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  5 in total

1.  Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.

Authors:  Shaniel T Bowen; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch; Mark E Lockhart; Alison C Weidner; Cecile A Ferrando; Charles W Nager; Holly E Richter; Charles R Rardin; Yuko M Komesu; Heidi S Harvie; Donna Mazloomdoost; Amaanti Sridhar; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 10.693

2.  The establishment of a 3D anatomical coordinate system for defining vaginal axis and spatial position.

Authors:  Deanna C E Sinex; Shaniel T Bowen; Ahmed Kashkoush; Arianna Rosemond; Danielle Carter; Prahlad G Menon; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 7.027

3.  The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Haifeng Wang; Jihong Shen; Song Li; Zhenhua Gao; Kunbin Ke; Peng Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

4.  Comparison of the Axes and Positions of the Uterus and Vagina Between Women With and Without Pelvic Floor Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Song Li; Xuewei Wen; Zhenhua Gao; Kunbin Ke; Jing Yang; Haifeng Wang; Yin Mo; Yizhen Zeng; Yuan Li; Daoming Tian; Jihong Shen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Position and orientation of vaginal pessaries in situ on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christopher X Hong; Elana Meer; Max Cioban; David J Tischfield; Daisy B Hassani; Heidi S Harvie
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.