INTRODUCTION: On-call medical services assumed by residents represent many hours of hard work and no studies have documented what it really entails. As part of an effort to improve our on-call system, we examined phone calls received by residents on call. Our objectives were to evaluate the characteristics of phone calls received by residents on call (who, when, why, need to go to the hospital) and to determine residents' perception of these calls. We also looked into implementing strategies to reduce unnecessary calls. METHODS: We prospectively collected information about calls using a standardized reporting form with the participation of all residents (10) from a single urology program over two periods of four weeks from November 2014 to March 2015. Residents answered pre- and post-collecting period questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 460 calls were recorded on 97 on-call days in two on-call lists. There was a mean of 3.5 (median 3, range 0-12) calls per weeknight and 7.7 (median 6, range 0-23) calls per weekend full day. Nintey-three calls (20%) led to the need for bedside evaluation and many of these were for new consultations (49%). The majority of calls originated from the clinical in-patient ward (49%) and emergency room (29%), and nurses (66%) and doctors (23%) most commonly initiated the calls. Calls between 11:00 pm and 8:00 am represented 13% of all calls. Most of the calls (77%) were perceived as relevant or very relevant. Most residents reported at least 80% of calls. CONCLUSIONS: Although likely representing an underestimate of the reality, we provide a first effort in documenting the call burden of Canadian urology residents.
INTRODUCTION: On-call medical services assumed by residents represent many hours of hard work and no studies have documented what it really entails. As part of an effort to improve our on-call system, we examined phone calls received by residents on call. Our objectives were to evaluate the characteristics of phone calls received by residents on call (who, when, why, need to go to the hospital) and to determine residents' perception of these calls. We also looked into implementing strategies to reduce unnecessary calls. METHODS: We prospectively collected information about calls using a standardized reporting form with the participation of all residents (10) from a single urology program over two periods of four weeks from November 2014 to March 2015. Residents answered pre- and post-collecting period questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 460 calls were recorded on 97 on-call days in two on-call lists. There was a mean of 3.5 (median 3, range 0-12) calls per weeknight and 7.7 (median 6, range 0-23) calls per weekend full day. Nintey-three calls (20%) led to the need for bedside evaluation and many of these were for new consultations (49%). The majority of calls originated from the clinical in-patient ward (49%) and emergency room (29%), and nurses (66%) and doctors (23%) most commonly initiated the calls. Calls between 11:00 pm and 8:00 am represented 13% of all calls. Most of the calls (77%) were perceived as relevant or very relevant. Most residents reported at least 80% of calls. CONCLUSIONS: Although likely representing an underestimate of the reality, we provide a first effort in documenting the call burden of Canadian urology residents.
Authors: Thomas Stamp; Paula Termuhlen; Sidney Miller; Dan Nolan; Peter Hutzel; James Gilchrist; R Michael Johnson Journal: Curr Surg Date: 2005 Jan-Feb
Authors: Syed Morad Hameed; Nadine Schuurman; Tarek Razek; Darrell Boone; Rardi Van Heest; Tracey Taulu; Nasira Lakha; David C Evans; D Ross Brown; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Henry T Stelfox; Dianne Dyer; Mary van Wijngaarden-Stephens; Sarvesh Logsetty; Avery B Nathens; Tanya Charyk-Stewart; Sandro Rizoli; Lorraine N Tremblay; Frederick Brenneman; Najma Ahmed; Elsie Galbraith; Neil Parry; Murray J Girotti; Guiseppe Pagliarello; Nancy Tze; Kosar Khwaja; Natalie Yanchar; John M Tallon; J Andrew I Trenholm; Candance Tegart; Ofer Amram; Myriam Berube; Usmaan Hameed; Richard K Simons Journal: J Trauma Date: 2010-12
Authors: Ryan M Antiel; Scott M Thompson; Frederic W Hafferty; Katherine M James; Jon C Tilburt; Michael P Bannon; Philip R Fischer; David R Farley; Darcy A Reed Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Najma Ahmed; Katharine S Devitt; Itay Keshet; Jonathan Spicer; Kevin Imrie; Liane Feldman; Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Ahmed Kayssi; Nir Lipsman; Maryam Elmi; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Chris Parshuram; Todd Mainprize; Richard J Warren; Paola Fata; M Sean Gorman; Stan Feinberg; James Rutka Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Annette Schröder; Walid A. Farhat; Darius J. Bägli; Armando J. Lorenzo; Martin A. Koyle Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 2.089