Literature DB >> 29380510

Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-Years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocols.

Catharina Göthberg1,2,3, Kerstin Gröndahl4, Omar Omar2,3, Peter Thomsen2,3, Christer Slotte2,3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on risk factors and complications after long-term implant treatment is limited. The aims were to evaluate the role of various fixation modes and to analyze complications and risks that affect long-term use of implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty partially edentulous subjects received three Brånemark TiUnite™ implants. Superstructures were attached directly at implant level (IL) or via abutments: machined surface (AM) and an oxidized surface (AOX, TiUnite™). Implants were immediately loaded (test) or unloaded for 3 months (control). Examinations occurred over a 5-year period.
RESULTS: Forty-four subjects were re-examined after 5 years. Cumulative survival rates in test and control groups were 93.9% and 97.0%, respectively. Marginal bone loss (MBL; Mean [SEM]) was significantly lower at superstructures connected to AM (1.61 [0.25] mm) than at sites with no abutment IL (2.14 [0.17] mm). Peri-implantitis occurred in 9.1% of subjects and in 4.0% of implants. Multiple linear regression indicated that increased probing pocket depth (PPD), periodontal disease experience, deteriorating health, and light smoking (≤10 cigarettes/day) predict greater MBL, whereas increased buccal soft tissue thickness and higher ISQ predict lower MBL.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that MBL was influenced by the connection type. A machined abutment, instead of connecting the superstructure directly at the implant level, was beneficial. The following factors influenced MBL: PPD, periodontal disease experience, deteriorating health, light smoking, buccal soft tissue thickness, and ISQ. The results on peri-implantitis underscore the need for long-term maintenance care. Further, the abutment material surface properties constitute additional target for strategies to minimize MBL.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical outcomes; complications; dental abutment; dental implant; marginal bone loss; risk factors; soft tissues; surface properties

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29380510     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  6 in total

1.  Effect Morphology and Surface Treatment of the Abutments of Dental Implants on the Dimension and Health of Peri-Implant Biological Space.

Authors:  Ibrahim Dib-Zaitum; Yasmina Guadilla-González; Javier Flores-Fraile; Juan Dib-Zakkour; Lorena Benito-Garzón; Javier Montero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Reversible, non-plaque-induced marginal bone loss around an osseointegrated implant: A case report.

Authors:  Kristian H Lind; Ingvild M Ulvik; Einar Berg; Knut N Leknes
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-07

3.  A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating.

Authors:  Francesco Carinci; Dorina Lauritano; Carlo Alberto Bignozzi; Daniele Pazzi; Valentina Candotto; Paulo Santos de Oliveira; Antonio Scarano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The Association of the One-Abutment at One-Time Concept with Marginal Bone Loss around the SLA and Platform Switch and Conical Abutment Implants.

Authors:  Nasreen Hamudi; Eitan Barnea; Evgeny Weinberg; Amir Laviv; Eitan Mijiritsky; Shlomo Matalon; Liat Chaushu; Roni Kolerman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Full-Arch Rehabilitation Using Trans-Mucosal Tissue-Level Implants with and without Implant-Abutment Units: A Case Report.

Authors:  Massimo Carossa; Mario Alovisi; Armando Crupi; Giulia Ambrogio; Francesco Pera
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 6.  Does the timing of implant placement and loading influence biological outcomes of implant-supported multiple-unit fixed dental prosthesis-A systematic review with meta-analyses.

Authors:  Louise Leite Aiquel; João Pitta; Georgios N Antonoglou; Irene Mischak; Irena Sailer; Michael Payer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.