Literature DB >> 29380235

Unintended consequences for patients of future personalized pharmacoprinting.

Susanne Kaae1, Johanna Lena Maria Lind2, Natalja Genina2, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong2.   

Abstract

Manufacturing pharmaceuticals by the use of 3D printing is a promising way to achieve more personalized drug treatment. To effectively use this technology, patients need to continuously measure their health, and new decisions have to be taken, for example, regarding the number of daily drugs including how many active pharmaceutical substances these should contain along with decisions around size, shape and color. Positive as well as negative effects of pharmacoprinted medicine on patients are likely to occur. Negative consequences with influence on patient autonomy and role might include: patients not being capable or interested in conducting self-monitoring, loosing overview of the medical treatment, reducing the ability to perform self-regulation, loosing trust in the pharmacoprinted medicine, and not being interested in taking on a new role in medical decision making. These issues are discussed in the paper in order to prevent upcoming challenges in the area of pharmacoprinting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient; Pharmacoprinting; Polypill; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29380235     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-018-0596-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  20 in total

1.  The effect of self-monitoring the INR on quality of anticoagulation and quality of life.

Authors:  W Kulinna; D Ney; T Wenzel; D L Heene; J Harenberg
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.180

2.  3D printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill with defined immediate and sustained release profiles.

Authors:  Shaban A Khaled; Jonathan C Burley; Morgan R Alexander; Jing Yang; Clive J Roberts
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  3D printing in pharmaceutics: A new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Jonathan Goole; Karim Amighi
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  The impact of an automated dose-dispensing scheme on user compliance, medication understanding, and medication stockpiles.

Authors:  Anna Bira Larsen; Lotte Stig Haugbølle
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2007-09

Review 5.  Social aspects in additive manufacturing of pharmaceutical products.

Authors:  Johanna Lind; Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong; Susanne Kaae; Jukka Rantanen; Natalja Genina
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.648

6.  Patient acceptability of 3D printed medicines.

Authors:  Alvaro Goyanes; Mariagiovanna Scarpa; Michael Kamlow; Simon Gaisford; Abdul W Basit; Mine Orlu
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 7.  Emergence of 3D Printed Dosage Forms: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Mohamed A Alhnan; Tochukwu C Okwuosa; Muzna Sadia; Ka-Wai Wan; Waqar Ahmed; Basel Arafat
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Patient perspectives on multiple medications versus combined pills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  B Williams; A Shaw; R Durrant; I Crinson; C Pagliari; S de Lusignan
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2005-11-10

Review 9.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

10.  Feasibility and patients' acceptance of Home Automated Telemanagement of oral anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  J Finkelstein; R Khare; J Ansell
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003
View more
  5 in total

1.  Perceptions, preferences and acceptability of patient designed 3D printed medicine by polypharmacy patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mark Møller Fastø; Natalja Genina; Susanne Kaae; Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2019-08-23

2.  Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display.

Authors:  Julian Louis Muff; Tobias Heye; Florian Markus Thieringer; Philipp Brantner
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-01-30

3.  Data-enriched edible pharmaceuticals (DEEPs): Patients' preferences, perceptions, and acceptability of new dosage forms and their digital aspects - An interview study.

Authors:  Meie Chao; Natalja Genina; Netta Beer; Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 4.  3D Printing in Pharmaceutical and Medical Applications - Recent Achievements and Challenges.

Authors:  Witold Jamróz; Joanna Szafraniec; Mateusz Kurek; Renata Jachowicz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  The Advent of a New Era in Digital Healthcare: A Role for 3D Printing Technologies in Drug Manufacturing?

Authors:  Ioannis I Andreadis; Christos I Gioumouxouzis; Georgios K Eleftheriadis; Dimitrios G Fatouros
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.