Literature DB >> 29380133

Non-urgent use of emergency departments: populations most likely to overestimate illness severity.

Hans Andrews1, Lawrence Kass2.   

Abstract

Patients' overestimation of their illness severity appears to contribute to the national epidemic of emergency department (ED) overcrowding. This study aims to elucidate which patient populations are more likely to have a higher estimation of illness severity (EIS). The investigator surveyed demographic factors of all non-urgent patients at an academic ED. The patients and physicians were asked to estimate the patients' illness severity using a 1-10 scale with anchors. The difference of these values was taken and compared across patient demographic subgroups using a 2-sample t-test. One hundred and seventeen patients were surveyed. The mean patient EIS was 5.22 (IQR 4), while the mean physician EIS was less severe at 7.57 (IQR 3), a difference of 2.35 (p < 0.0001). Patient subgroups with the highest EIS compared to the physicians' EIS include those who were self-referred (difference of 2.65, p = 0.042), with income ≤ $25,000 (difference of 2.96, p = 0.004), with less than a college education (difference of 2.83, p = 0.018), and with acute-on-chronic musculoskeletal pain (difference of 4.17, p = 0.001). If we assume the physicians' EIS is closer to the true illness severity, patients with lower socioeconomic status, lower education status, who were self-referred, and who suffered from acute-on-chronic musculoskeletal pain are more likely to overestimate their illness severity and may contribute to non-urgent use of the ED. They may benefit from further education or resources for care to prevent ED misuse. The large difference of acute-on-chronic musculoskeletal pain may reflect a physician's bias to underestimate the severity of a patients' illness in this particular population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency department; Illness severity; Non-urgent; Overcrowding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29380133     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-018-1792-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  24 in total

1.  The use of hospital emergency departments for nonurgent health problems: a national perspective.

Authors:  P J Cunningham; C M Clancy; J W Cohen; M Wilets
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Durand; Stéphanie Gentile; Bénédicte Devictor; Sylvie Palazzolo; Pascal Vignally; Patrick Gerbeaux; Roland Sambuc
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Ambulatory visits to hospital emergency departments. Patterns and reasons for use. 24 Hours in the ED Study Group.

Authors:  G P Young; M B Wagner; A L Kellermann; J Ellis; D Bouley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Health literacy - identification and response.

Authors:  Scott C Ratzan; Ruth M Parker
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006-12

5.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Use of an emergency department by nonurgent patients.

Authors:  William E Northington; Jane H Brice; Bin Zou
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care.

Authors:  Jonathan Afilalo; Adrian Marinovich; Marc Afilalo; Antoinette Colacone; Ruth Léger; Bernard Unger; Claudine Giguère
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Emergency department patient flow: the influence of hospital census variables on emergency department length of stay.

Authors:  Ray Lucas; Heather Farley; Joseph Twanmoh; Andrej Urumov; Nils Olsen; Bruce Evans; Hamed Kabiri
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Health care professionals' reactions to patient pain: impact of knowledge about medical evidence and psychosocial influences.

Authors:  Lies De Ruddere; Liesbet Goubert; Michaël André Louis Stevens; Myriam Deveugele; Kenneth Denton Craig; Geert Crombez
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Determinants of emergency department use by ambulatory patients at an urban public hospital.

Authors:  D W Baker; C D Stevens; R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characteristics of Non-Emergent Visits in Emergency Departments: Profiles and Longitudinal Pattern Changes in Taiwan, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Liang-Chung Huang; Wu-Fu Chung; Shih-Wei Liu; Jau-Ching Wu; Li-Fu Chen; Yu-Chun Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Understanding people who self-referred in an emergency department with primary care problems during office hours: a qualitative interview study at a Daytime General Practice Cooperative in two hospitals in The Hague, The Netherlands.

Authors:  Rosa Naomi Naomi Minderhout; Pien Venema; Hedwig M M Vos; Jojanneke Kant; Marc Abraham Bruijnzeels; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Outpatient care in acute and prehospital emergency medicine by emergency medical and patient transport service over a 10-year period: a retrospective study based on dispatch data from a German emergency medical dispatch centre (OFF-RESCUE).

Authors:  Marc S Schehadat; Guido Scherer; David A Groneberg; Manfred Kaps; Michael H K Bendels
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.