Meisong Zhu1, Sijing Li1, Zexin Su1, Xiaoqi Zhou1, Peng Peng2, Jianyi Li2, Jinping Wang3, Lijun Lin4. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongye Zhong Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Anatomy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, School of Basic Medicine Science, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Nan Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Qingyuan People's Hospital, B24 Xinchengyinquan Road, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan, Guangdong, China. jpwpzhh@163.com. 4. Department of Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongye Zhong Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. gost1@smu.edu.cn.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Accurate anatomic graft tunnel positioning is essential for the successful application of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The accurate insertion of the tibial tunnel (TT) remains challenging. Here, we explored a novel strategy of patient-specific drill template (PDT) for the placement of TT in ACL reconstruction and assessed its efficacy and accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TT placement was randomized and performed by use of the PDT technique in 40 patients (PDT group) and theconventional arthroscopic technique in 38 patients (Arthroscopic group). After surgery, the deviations at the center point of the ACL tibial attachment area and radiological TT positioning were assessed in both groups. The preoperative and follow-up examinations included pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scales were used to compare the knee stability and the functional state. RESULTS: The ideal center points achieved in the PDT group were more precise than that in the arthroscopic group (p < 0.001). Radiological TT positioning performed by use of the PDT technique was more accurate than that by the arthroscopic technique (p = 0.027). Statistical differences could not be found between the groups in terms of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, the Lysholm or International Knee Documentation Committee scales. Both groups improved at follow-up compared with the preoperative assessment in terms of the pivot-shift test, the laxity tests, and scoring scales. CONCLUSIONS: The novel PDT strategy could provide more accurate TT positioning than the traditional arthroscopic technique in ACL reconstruction. However, functional scales and stability tests gave similar results in the PDT and the standard techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Accurate anatomic graft tunnel positioning is essential for the successful application of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The accurate insertion of the tibial tunnel (TT) remains challenging. Here, we explored a novel strategy of patient-specific drill template (PDT) for the placement of TT in ACL reconstruction and assessed its efficacy and accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:TT placement was randomized and performed by use of the PDT technique in 40 patients (PDT group) and the conventional arthroscopic technique in 38 patients (Arthroscopic group). After surgery, the deviations at the center point of the ACL tibial attachment area and radiological TT positioning were assessed in both groups. The preoperative and follow-up examinations included pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scales were used to compare the knee stability and the functional state. RESULTS: The ideal center points achieved in the PDT group were more precise than that in the arthroscopic group (p < 0.001). Radiological TT positioning performed by use of the PDT technique was more accurate than that by the arthroscopic technique (p = 0.027). Statistical differences could not be found between the groups in terms of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, the Lysholm or International Knee Documentation Committee scales. Both groups improved at follow-up compared with the preoperative assessment in terms of the pivot-shift test, the laxity tests, and scoring scales. CONCLUSIONS: The novel PDT strategy could provide more accurate TT positioning than the traditional arthroscopic technique in ACL reconstruction. However, functional scales and stability tests gave similar results in the PDT and the standard techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.