Literature DB >> 29379717

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation and voltage mapping for symptomatic atrial fibrillation 9 months after Watchman device implantation.

Henry D Huang1, Viren M Patel2, Parikshit S Sharma1, Zenith Jameria3, Sorin Lazar3, Richard Trohman1, Erik Wissner3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Cryoballoon; Left atrial appendage; PVI; Watchman device

Year:  2017        PMID: 29379717      PMCID: PMC5775442          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2017.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep        ISSN: 2214-0271


× No keyword cloud information.
Cryoballoon ablation is a feasible alternative to radiofrequency catheter for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation in patients with pre-existing Watchman devices. Caution should be taken with regard to the timing of PVI post-Watchman implantation owing to interpatient variability in time to endocardialization of the device surface and potential risk of ablation-related thrombus formation. Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping provides enhanced knowledge of left atrial anatomy and assists in locating pulmonary veins prior to cryoballoon deployment. High-amplitude left atrial appendage–like electrograms may be observed on the surface of endocardialized Watchman devices.

Introduction

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) is frequently performed as a nonpharmacologic, second-line therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)1, 2 and contraindications to long-term anticoagulation. Although combined catheter pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and Watchman procedures may be performed successfully for patients with symptomatic AF, a simultaneous approach is not always feasible or in some cases PVI may not be clinically indicated at the time of Watchman implantation. Staged radiofrequency PVI and left atrial (LA) catheter ablation following Watchman device placement has been shown to be feasible3, 4, 5; however, other modalities for PVI have not been reported in the postimplant population.

Case report

A 64-year-old man with a past medical history of obesity, hypertension, paroxysmal AF, and spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage presented to our institution for elective catheter ablation for treatment of symptomatic AF. Nine months prior to presentation, the patient underwent successful implantation of a 30 mm Watchman LAAO device. The patient's postimplantation transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) imaging showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction, appropriate seating/compression of the Watchman device within the ostium of the left atrial appendage (LAA), and no residual leak around the device. Surveillance TEE imaging at 45 days and 6 months demonstrated stable position of the Watchman device and no evidence of peri-device leak. The patient stopped warfarin at 45 days and discontinued dual antiplatelet therapy at 6 months as per manufacturer-recommended guidelines. At 6-month clinical follow-up, the patient complained of fatigue and palpitations, and subsequently elective direct current cardioversion was attempted but was unsuccessful. After discussion of risks and benefits, the patient opted to undergo PVI procedure and repeat attempt at direct current cardioversion. Written informed consent was obtained prior to the procedure. Members of the anesthesia staff intubated the patient and performed general anesthesia during the case. Bilateral common femoral vein access was obtained via Seldinger technique. A decapolar catheter was placed in the coronary sinus and an 8F intracardiac echocardiographic (ICE) probe was advanced into the right atrium. A long sheath (Agilis; St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) was advanced over a guidewire into the superior vena cava. The guidewire was exchanged for a transseptal needle and transseptal puncture was performed under ICE and fluoroscopic guidance. A bolus of heparin was administered and the activated clotting time was maintained between 300 and 350 seconds during the procedure. A transesophageal thermometer was inserted to avoid potential cryothermal injury to the esophagus. Transseptal access was used to advance a PentaRay mapping catheter (5 radiating splines with 10 pairs of 3F, 1-mm-tip and 2-mm center-to-center–spaced electrodes; Biosense Webster Inc, Diamond Bar, CA) into the left atrium through the long sheath. Once the catheter was in the left atrium, a 3-dimensional electroanatomic map of the left atrium and pulmonary veins was constructed using the Carto 3 mapping system (Biosense Webster Inc). Next, the PentaRay mapping catheter was removed from the left atrium and the long sheath was exchanged for a FlexCath Advance steerable sheath over a stiff guidewire placed within the left superior pulmonary vein. A 28-mm cryoballoon catheter (Artic Front Advance; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was then advanced through the long sheath into the left atrium. The Carto 3 system was used to visualize the Achieve mapping catheter (Medtronic) and to guide positioning into each pulmonary vein. Adequate pulmonary vein occlusion was assessed by contrast injection and 1–2 freezes between 180 and 240 seconds long were delivered to each pulmonary vein (Figure 1). Entrance and exit block was confirmed in all 4 pulmonary veins by pacing from the decapolar and the Achieve mapping catheters. After confirmation of PVI, the patient was successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm with a 200 J external shock. The cryoballoon catheter was exchanged for the PentaRay mapping catheter and a bipolar endocardial voltage map of the LA cavity and pulmonary veins was created. Surprisingly, bipolar voltage recordings obtained with the splines of the PentaRay catheter directly over the endothelialized surface of the Watchman device were normal in amplitude and even LAA-like (Figure 2).
Figure 1

A: Left anterior oblique (LAO) view of the patient's existing Watchman device and Achieve circular mapping catheter positioned within the left superior pulmonary vein. B: LAO view following inflation of the 28 mm cryoballoon at ostium of the left upper pulmonary vein and contrast injection showing adequate seal. Black arrows indicate Watchman device; white arrow indicates inflated cryoballoon.

Figure 2

A: Left anterior oblique fluoroscopic view of PentaRay mapping catheter and splines over exposed endothelial surface of the Watchman device. B, C: Carto 3 left atrial bipolar endocardial voltage map and left atrial appendage–like electrograms obtained from endocardial surface of Watchman device 9 months postimplantation.

A: Left anterior oblique (LAO) view of the patient's existing Watchman device and Achieve circular mapping catheter positioned within the left superior pulmonary vein. B: LAO view following inflation of the 28 mm cryoballoon at ostium of the left upper pulmonary vein and contrast injection showing adequate seal. Black arrows indicate Watchman device; white arrow indicates inflated cryoballoon. A: Left anterior oblique fluoroscopic view of PentaRay mapping catheter and splines over exposed endothelial surface of the Watchman device. B, C: Carto 3 left atrial bipolar endocardial voltage map and left atrial appendage–like electrograms obtained from endocardial surface of Watchman device 9 months postimplantation. The LA dwell time for the procedure was 58 minutes. ICE imaging was utilized throughout the case and there was no evidence of intracardiac thrombus formation or pericardial effusion during the procedure. Heparin infusion was discontinued after catheters and sheaths were removed from the left atrium. The patient experienced no complications during the procedure and was discharged home in stable condition the following day. TEE imaging performed 2 weeks post-PVI showed stable Watchman device position and no evidence of peri-device leak. The patient was seen in follow-up 1 month postprocedure without recurrent AF, bleeding events, or thromboembolic symptoms. The patient received apixaban 5 mg twice daily for 2 months following the PVI procedure.

Discussion

Current guidelines recommend PVI as a treatment option for patients with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Approval of the Watchman device and other LAAO technologies in the future will undoubtedly increase the number of patients with clinical indications for PVI who have pre-existing LAAO devices. Several observational studies have shown that catheter-based PVI and LA ablation may be feasible when performed at least 45 days after Watchman device placement,3, 4, 6 although the optimal time for ablation postimplant remains unclear, and thrombus formation on the surface of the Watchman device following ablation has also been reported, as well as new and increased peri-device leaks following radiofrequency catheter ablation in the area of the Watchman device. Additional risks of extensive radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation post–LAAO device implantation include inadvertent ablation over the endothelialized device surface owing to distortion of the normal anatomy of the appendage–ridge interface, device perforation, catheter entrapment, device dislodgement, and potential increase in size of peri-device leak. Although RF ablation is still the most commonly performed modality for PVI, cryoballoon ablation is frequently performed in clinical practice and offers several potential advantages, including shorter LA dwell time and total procedure time. Furthermore, use of cryothermal energy has been described to result in less endothelial disruption and less thrombus formation compared to RF ablation.10, 11 A single-center study observed fewer cerebral microembolic signals (a risk factor for neurologic complications) in patients who underwent cryoballoon PVI compared to those referred for PVI using irrigated and nonirrigated RF ablation. Currently cryoballoon PVI is only US Food and Drug Administration approved for treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Because patients eligible for the Watchman device tend to be older and have more advanced comorbidities than the general population, many with the device may have persistent rather than paroxysmal forms of AF. In most cases, LA and pulmonary vein anatomy is already known from prior TEE or computed tomography imaging performed prior to the Watchman procedure. However, as demonstrated in this report, 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping during cryoballoon ablation is feasible and not only provides enhanced knowledge of LA anatomy but assists in locating pulmonary veins prior to balloon deployment. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of cryoballoon PVI performed for the treatment of symptomatic AF in a patient following Watchman device placement. This case demonstrates that the cryoballoon PVI can be performed safely and successfully, especially when performed in combination with concurrent 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping. More interestingly, when bipolar voltage mapping was performed using a high-density mapping catheter over the surface of the Watchman device, high-amplitude LAA-like electrograms were observed (Figure 2). This unexpected finding is supported by histopathologic evidence of endocardialization of the device surface with smooth muscle cells in canine and human cadavers. In the same study, an organizing layer of thin laminar fibrin thrombus covered each device's atrial surface prior to complete replacement with new endocardium. Because of the potential inability to distinguish between the endocardialized surface of the Watchman device and the left atrium based upon usual bipolar electrogram characteristics, inadvertent ablation over the surface of the Watchman may be difficult to avoid during RF catheter PVI and LA ablation. Given the unknown consequences this may pose and the variable progress of postimplant healing between patients, cryoballoon ablation might possibly provide a safer alternative and should be considered as an alternate method for PVI in patients with pre-existing LAAO devices, as cryoballoon ablation may be less thrombogenic, provides distinct lesion delineation between ablated and nonablated tissue, and may be less likely to result in inadvertent ablation atop the LAAO device.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Cryothermal ablation: mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  D L Lustgarten; D Keane; J Ruskin
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.194

2.  Left atrial appendage obliteration: mechanisms of healing and intracardiac integration.

Authors:  Robert S Schwartz; David R Holmes; Robert A Van Tassel; Robert Hauser; Timothy D Henry; Michael Mooney; Ray Matthews; Shephal Doshi; Russell M Jones; Renu Virmani
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Embolization of Watchman Device Following a Hybrid Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Watchman Implantation Procedure.

Authors:  James Gabriels; Stuart Beldner; Mohammad Khan; Jonah Zeitlin; Ram Jadonath; Apoor Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-04-17

4.  Left atrial catheter ablation subsequent to Watchman® left atrial appendage device implantation: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Daniel T Walker; Karen P Phillips
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  Paul Khairy; Patrick Chauvet; John Lehmann; Jean Lambert; Laurent Macle; Jean-François Tanguay; Martin G Sirois; Domenic Santoianni; Marc Dubuc
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; David Holmes; Shephal K Doshi; Petr Neuzil; Saibal Kar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Feasibility and clinical efficacy of left atrial ablation for the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with left atrial appendage closure devices.

Authors:  Christian-Hendrik Heeger; Andreas Rillig; Tina Lin; Shibu Mathew; Sebastian Deiss; Christine Lemes; Maichel Botros; Andreas Metzner; Erik Wissner; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Feifan Ouyang; Roland Richard Tilz
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Saibal Kar; Matthew J Price; Brian Whisenant; Horst Sievert; Shephal K Doshi; Kenneth Huber; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during endocardial pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of three different ablation techniques.

Authors:  Loes D Sauren; Yves VAN Belle; Luc DE Roy; Laurent Pison; Mark LA Meir; Frederick H VAN DER Veen; Harry J Crijns; Luc Jordaens; Werner H Mess; Jos G Maessen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06-22

10.  Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kuck; Josep Brugada; Alexander Fürnkranz; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; K R Julian Chun; Arif Elvan; Thomas Arentz; Kurt Bestehorn; Stuart J Pocock; Jean-Paul Albenque; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Catheter Ablation in Patients with Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices.

Authors:  Binhao Wang; Bin He; Guohua Fu; Mingjun Feng; Xianfeng Du; Jing Liu; Yibo Yu; Huimin Chu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.