| Literature DB >> 29378593 |
Yong Han1, Yanli An2, Gang Jia1, Xihui Wang1, Chen He1, Yinan Ding1, Qiusha Tang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Keywords: Molecular imaging; Nanoprobes; Pancreatic cancer; Upconversion nanoparticles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29378593 PMCID: PMC5787929 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-018-0335-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1TEM images and size histograms of NaYF4:Yb,Er core nanoparticles (a, b) and NaYF4: Yb,Er@NaGdF4 core@shell nanoparticles (c, d)
Fig. 2a X-ray powder Diffraction (XRD) and b emission diffraction X-ray (EDX) spectrum of NaYF4:Yb,Er@NaGdF4 core@shell nanoparticles
Fig. 3TEM image (a) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurement (b) of UPGs micelles. c Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of UPGs (blue line) and UPGs-CD326 (red line). d DLS size measurements of UPG and UPG-CD326 dispersed in PBS for varied time durations (0–7 day)
Fig. 4Normalized upconversion luminescence spectra of core, core@shell particles in cyclohexane and UPG micelles in PBS under 980 nm excitation (a). The insets are full-color photographs of the cyclohexane solutions of the core (left), the core@shell particles (middle) and aqueous solution of UPG (right) taken in the dark under excitation of a 980 nm laser beam. b T1-MRI maps & values, and c plots of R1 versus Gd3+ concentrations for UPGs in aqueous solution. The corresponding relaxivity value of UPGs is estimated to be r1 = 3.84/mM/s
Fig. 5In vitro toxicity evaluation of RAW 264.7 macrophages after co-incubation with UPG/UPG-CD326 for (a) 24 and (b) 48 h by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
Fig. 6In vivo toxicology study and serum biochemistry results obtained from balb/c nude mice after 7 days postintravenous injection with 150 µL physiological saline of UPG/UPG-CD326 (25 mg/mL): Complete blood panel markers including: a red blood cells (RBC), b white blood cells (WBC), c hemoglobin (HGB); liver function markers including: d alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP); kidney function markers including: e blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and f creatinine (CREA); untreated healthy mice were used as the control. Statistics were based on six mice per data point
Fig. 7In vivo toxicology study and serum biochemistry results obtained from balb/c nude mice after 35 days postintravenous injection with 150 µL physiological saline of UPG/UPG-CD326 (25 mg/mL): Complete blood panel markers including: a red blood cells (RBC), b white blood cells (WBC), c hemoglobin (HGB); liver function markers including: d alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP); kidney function markers including: e blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and f creatinine (CREA); untreated healthy mice were used as the control. Statistics were based on six mice per data point
Fig. 8In vitro cellular uptake study of the UCNP-based micelles in BxPc-3 cells. Cells were treated with (a) targeted (i.e., UPG-CD326) micelles, and b nontargeted (i.e., UPG) micelles (200 μg/mL), as well as (c) the combination of free anti-human CD326 (3 × 10−6 M) and targeted micelles (i.e., blocking) for 2 h at 37 °C. Blue luminescence is from the nucleus after being stained with DAPI. Upon 980 nm irradiation, the UPGs micelles emit green luminescence from the cytoplasm of the cells treated with UPG-CD326 and UPG micelles
Fig. 9In vivo upconversion luminescence (UCL) images obtained before and at different time points after intravenous injection of the targeted (i.e., UPG-CD326) (a) and nontargeted (i.e., UPG) (b) micelles. c Comparison of the mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) between targeted and nontargeted groups at the different time points (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)
Fig. 10In vivo T1-MRI images of BxPc-3 tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection of the targeted (UPG-CD326) (a) and nontargeted (UPG) (b) micelles at designated time points (Red dotted circles show the site of tumor, values mean T1, unit: ms). c Comparison of the relative MRI intensities between targeted and nontargeted groups at the different time points (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)
Fig. 11Biodistribution of UPG-CD326 and UPG micelles in mice post-injection. The concentration of Y element in the tumor and tissue samples was evaluated by ICP-MS at (a) 12, (b) 24 h, and (c) 48 h post-injection. d Targeting efficiency of UPG-CD326 and UPG micelles in mice post-injection. Data represent mean ± SD of 5 replicate mice at each sacrifice time. *p < 0.05
Fig. 12Bio-TEM images of pancreatic cancer tissues from BxPc-3-tumor bearing mice after 48 h post-injection with (a) UPG-CD326 micelles, (b) UPG micelles and (c) normal saline. Red arrow show the UPG micelles reside around the nucleus. C and N mean cytoplasm and nucleus, respectively