Literature DB >> 29378283

Emotion lies in the eye of the listener: Emotional arousal to novel sounds is reflected in the sympathetic contribution to the pupil dilation response and the P3.

Andreas Widmann1, Erich Schröger2, Nicole Wetzel3.   

Abstract

Novel sounds in the auditory oddball paradigm elicit a biphasic dilation of the pupil (PDR) and P3a as well as novelty P3 event-related potentials (ERPs). The biphasic PDR has been hypothesized to reflect the relaxation of the iris sphincter muscle due to parasympathetic inhibition and the constriction of the iris dilator muscle due to sympathetic activation. We measured the PDR and the P3 to neutral and to emotionally arousing negative novels in dark and moderate lighting conditions. By means of principal component analysis (PCA) of the PDR data we extracted two components: the early one was absent in darkness and, thus, presumably reflects parasympathetic inhibition, whereas the late component occurred in darkness and light and presumably reflects sympathetic activation. Importantly, only this sympathetic late component was enhanced for emotionally arousing (as compared to neutral) sounds supporting the hypothesis that emotional arousal specifically activates the sympathetic nervous system. In the ERPs we observed P3a and novelty P3 in response to novel sounds. Both components were enhanced for emotionally arousing (as compared to neutral) novels. Our results demonstrate that sympathetic and parasympathetic contributions to the PDR can be separated and link emotional arousal to sympathetic nervous system activation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomic nervous system; Emotional arousal; Novelty; P3a; Pupil dilation; Pupillometry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29378283     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  12 in total

1.  Infants relax in response to unfamiliar foreign lullabies.

Authors:  Constance M Bainbridge; Mila Bertolo; Julie Youngers; S Atwood; Lidya Yurdum; Jan Simson; Kelsie Lopez; Feng Xing; Alia Martin; Samuel A Mehr
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-10-19

2.  The contribution of temporal analysis of pupillometry measurements to cognitive research.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Dalit Milshtein; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-18

3.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Publication guidelines and recommendations for pupillary measurement in psychophysiological studies.

Authors:  Stuart R Steinhauer; Margaret M Bradley; Greg J Siegle; Kathryn A Roecklein; Annika Dix
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.348

5.  Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort.

Authors:  Patrycja Książek; Adriana A Zekveld; Dorothea Wendt; Lorenz Fiedler; Thomas Lunner; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Social Media Approval Reduces Emotional Arousal for People High in Narcissism: Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Kyle Nash; Andre Johansson; Kumar Yogeeswaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Cortical modulation of pupillary function: systematic review.

Authors:  Costanza Peinkhofer; Daniel Kondziella; Gitte M Knudsen; Rita Moretti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The impact of novelty and emotion on attention-related neuronal and pupil responses in children.

Authors:  Carolina Bonmassar; Andreas Widmann; Nicole Wetzel
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Isabel Fraga; Alicia Leiva; Pilar Ferré
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-03

10.  Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Ira Kurthen; Martin Meyer; Matthias Schlesewsky; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.