Literature DB >> 29377992

Genetic and epigenetic factors which modulate differentiation propensity in human pluripotent stem cells.

Alexander Keller1, Dominika Dziedzicka1, Filippo Zambelli1, Christina Markouli1, Karen Sermon1, Claudia Spits1, Mieke Geens1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) lines are known to have a bias in their differentiation. This gives individual cell lines a propensity to preferentially differentiate towards one germ layer or cell type over others. Chromosomal aberrations, mitochondrial mutations, genetic diversity and epigenetic variance are the main drivers of this phenomenon, and can lead to a wide range of phenotypes. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: Our aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of the different factors which influence differentiation propensity. Specifically, we sought to highlight known genetic variances and their mechanisms, in addition to more general observations from larger abnormalities. Furthermore, we wanted to provide an up-to-date list of a growing number of predictive indicators which are able to identify differentiation propensity before the initiation of differentiation. As differentiation propensity can lead to difficulties in both research as well as clinical translation, our thorough overview could be a useful tool. SEARCH
METHODS: Combinations of the following key words were applied as search criteria in the PubMed database: embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, differentiation propensity (also: potential, efficiency, capacity, bias, variability), epigenetics, chromosomal abnormalities, genetic aberrations, X chromosome inactivation, mitochondrial function, mitochondrial metabolism, genetic diversity, reprogramming, predictive marker, residual stem cell, clinic. Only studies in English were included, ranging from 2000 to 2017, with a majority ranging from 2010 to 1017. Further manuscripts were added from cross-references. OUTCOMES: Differentiation propensity is affected by a wide variety of (epi)genetic factors. These factors clearly lead to a loss of differentiation capacity, preference towards certain cell types and oftentimes, phenotypes which begin to resemble cancer. Broad changes in (epi)genetics, such as aneuploidies or wide-ranging modifications to the epigenetic landscape tend to lead to extensive, less definite changes in differentiation capacity, whereas more specific abnormalities often have precise ramifications in which certain cell types become more preferential. Furthermore, there appears to be a greater, though often less considered, contribution to differentiation propensity by factors such as mitochondria and inherent genetic diversity. Varied differentiation capacity can also lead to potential consequences in the clinical translation of hPSC, including the occurrence of residual undifferentiated stem cells, and the transplantation of potentially transformed cells. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: As hPSC continue to advance towards the clinic, our understanding of them progresses as well. As a result, the challenges faced become more numerous, but also more clear. If the transition to the clinic is to be achieved with a minimum number of potential setbacks, thorough evaluation of the cells will be an absolute necessity. Altered differentiation propensity represents at least one such hurdle, for which researchers and eventually clinicians will need to find solutions. Already, steps are being taken to tackle the issue, though further research will be required to evaluate any long-term risks it poses.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical translation; differentiation propensity; epigenetic variance; genetic abnormalities; genetic diversity; human embryonic stem cells; human induced pluripotent stem cells; mitochondria; predictive markers

Year:  2018        PMID: 29377992     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  13 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability reducing effect of paclitaxel and lapatinib in mouse embryonic stem cells with chromosomal abnormality.

Authors:  Banafsheh Mirzaei-Seresht; Masood Bazrgar; Masoud Sheidai; Seyedeh-Nafiseh Hassani; Najmeh Sadat Masoudi; Sepideh Mollammohammadi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Gain of 20q11.21 in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Impairs TGF-β-Dependent Neuroectodermal Commitment.

Authors:  C Markouli; E Couvreu De Deckersberg; M Regin; H T Nguyen; F Zambelli; A Keller; D Dziedzicka; J De Kock; L Tilleman; F Van Nieuwerburgh; L Franceschini; K Sermon; M Geens; C Spits
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 7.765

3.  Uncovering low-level mosaicism in human embryonic stem cells using high throughput single cell shallow sequencing.

Authors:  Alexander Keller; Laurentijn Tilleman; Dominika Dziedzicka; Filippo Zambelli; Karen Sermon; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Claudia Spits; Mieke Geens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Development of genetic quality tests for good manufacturing practice-compliant induced pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives.

Authors:  Hye-Yeong Jo; Hyo-Won Han; Inuk Jung; Ji Hyeon Ju; Soon-Jung Park; Sunghwan Moon; Dongho Geum; Hyemin Kim; Han-Jin Park; Sun Kim; Glyn N Stacey; Soo Kyung Koo; Mi-Hyun Park; Jung-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Expression of miRNAs from the Imprinted DLK1/DIO3 Locus Signals the Osteogenic Potential of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Laetitia Barrault; Jacqueline Gide; Tingting Qing; Lea Lesueur; Jorg Tost; Jerome Alexandre Denis; Michel Cailleret; Laetitia Aubry; Marc Peschanski; Cécile Martinat; Sandrine Baghdoyan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Endogenous suppression of WNT signalling in human embryonic stem cells leads to low differentiation propensity towards definitive endoderm.

Authors:  Dominika Dziedzicka; Mukul Tewary; Alexander Keller; Laurentijn Tilleman; Laura Prochazka; Joel Östblom; Edouard Couvreu De Deckersberg; Christina Markouli; Silvie Franck; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Claudia Spits; Peter W Zandstra; Karen Sermon; Mieke Geens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sustained intrinsic WNT and BMP4 activation impairs hESC differentiation to definitive endoderm and drives the cells towards extra-embryonic mesoderm.

Authors:  C Markouli; E Couvreu De Deckersberg; D Dziedzicka; M Regin; S Franck; A Keller; A Gheldof; M Geens; K Sermon; C Spits
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  High-throughput micropatterning platform reveals Nodal-dependent bisection of peri-gastrulation-associated versus preneurulation-associated fate patterning.

Authors:  Mukul Tewary; Dominika Dziedzicka; Joel Ostblom; Laura Prochazka; Nika Shakiba; Tiam Heydari; Daniel Aguilar-Hidalgo; Curtis Woodford; Elia Piccinini; David Becerra-Alonso; Alice Vickers; Blaise Louis; Nafees Rahman; Davide Danovi; Mieke Geens; Fiona M Watt; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) Provide a Potentially Unlimited T Cell Source for CAR-T Cell Development and Off-the-Shelf Products.

Authors:  Muhammad Sadeqi Nezhad; Meghdad Abdollahpour-Alitappeh; Behzad Rezaei; Mahboubeh Yazdanifar; Alexander Marcus Seifalian
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Modeling Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young in Pluripotent Stem Cells: Challenges and Achievements.

Authors:  Carmel Braverman-Gross; Nissim Benvenisty
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.