Tae L Hart, Susan T Charles1, Mekhala Gunaratne2, Nancy N Baxter3, Michelle Cotterchio4, Zane Cohen5, Steven Gallinger6. 1. Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California. 2. Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Sinai Health System, Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgical Oncology Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data are lacking regarding physical functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors >10 years postdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine self-reported physical functioning, quality of life, and psychological well-being in long-term colorectal cancer survivors compared with age- and sex-matched unaffected control subjects. DESIGN: Participants completed a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: The colorectal cancer survivors and unaffected control subjects were recruited from the Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry. PATIENTS: A population-based sample of colorectal cancer survivors (N = 296) and their age- and sex-matched unaffected control subjects (N = 255) were included. Survivors were, on average, 15 years postdiagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale, bowel dysfunction with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center scale, urinary dysfunction with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, fatigue with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale, and depression with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale. RESULTS: In linear mixed-model analyses adjusting for income, education, race, and comorbid medical conditions, survivors reported good emotional, functional, physical, and overall quality of life, comparable to control subjects. Fatigue and urinary functioning did not differ significantly between survivors and control subjects. Survivors reported significantly higher social quality of life and lower depression compared with unaffected control subjects. The only area where survivors reported significantly worse deficits was in bowel dysfunction, but the magnitude of differences was relatively small. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by moderately low participation rates. Findings are likely biased toward healthy participants. No baseline assessment was available to examine change in outcomes over time. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term colorectal cancer survivors appear to have comparable quality of life and, in some areas, better well-being than their unaffected peers. Bowel dysfunction may continue to be an ongoing issue even 15 years after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Overall quality of life can be expected to be good in this group of older survivors. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A476.
BACKGROUND: Data are lacking regarding physical functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors >10 years postdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine self-reported physical functioning, quality of life, and psychological well-being in long-term colorectal cancer survivors compared with age- and sex-matched unaffected control subjects. DESIGN:Participants completed a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: The colorectal cancer survivors and unaffected control subjects were recruited from the Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry. PATIENTS: A population-based sample of colorectal cancer survivors (N = 296) and their age- and sex-matched unaffected control subjects (N = 255) were included. Survivors were, on average, 15 years postdiagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale, bowel dysfunction with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center scale, urinary dysfunction with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, fatigue with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale, and depression with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale. RESULTS: In linear mixed-model analyses adjusting for income, education, race, and comorbid medical conditions, survivors reported good emotional, functional, physical, and overall quality of life, comparable to control subjects. Fatigue and urinary functioning did not differ significantly between survivors and control subjects. Survivors reported significantly higher social quality of life and lower depression compared with unaffected control subjects. The only area where survivors reported significantly worse deficits was in bowel dysfunction, but the magnitude of differences was relatively small. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by moderately low participation rates. Findings are likely biased toward healthy participants. No baseline assessment was available to examine change in outcomes over time. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term colorectal cancer survivors appear to have comparable quality of life and, in some areas, better well-being than their unaffected peers. Bowel dysfunction may continue to be an ongoing issue even 15 years after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Overall quality of life can be expected to be good in this group of older survivors. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A476.
Authors: Alok Vij; Marc A Kowalkowski; Tae Hart; Heather Honoré Goltz; David J Hoffman; Sara J Knight; Peter R Caroll; David M Latini Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Suzanne K Chambers; Xingqiong Meng; Pip Youl; Joanne Aitken; Jeff Dunn; Peter Baade Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Polly A Newcomb; John Baron; Michelle Cotterchio; Steve Gallinger; John Grove; Robert Haile; David Hall; John L Hopper; Jeremy Jass; Loïc Le Marchand; Paul Limburg; Noralane Lindor; John D Potter; Allyson S Templeton; Steve Thibodeau; Daniela Seminara Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Dejana Braithwaite; Dan H Moore; William A Satariano; Marilyn L Kwan; Robert A Hiatt; Candyce Kroenke; Bette J Caan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Shane Lloyd; David Baraghoshi; Randa Tao; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Glynn W Gilcrease; Jonathan Whisenant; John R Weis; Courtney Scaife; Thomas B Pickron; Lyen C Huang; Marcus M Monroe; Sarah Abdelaziz; Alison M Fraser; Ken R Smith; Vikrant Deshmukh; Michael Newman; Kerry G Rowe; John Snyder; Niloy J Samadder; Mia Hashibe Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Maria Velia Giulietti; Anna Vespa; Marica Ottaviani; Rossana Berardi; Giancarlo Balercia; Giorgio Arnaldi; Pisana Gattafoni; Paolo Fabbietti; Mirko Di Rosa; Roberta Spatuzzi Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2019 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Miren Orive; Ane Anton-Ladislao; Santiago Lázaro; Nerea Gonzalez; Marisa Bare; Nerea Fernandez de Larrea; Maximino Redondo; Amaia Bilbao; Cristina Sarasqueta; Urko Aguirre; José M Quintana Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Victoria M White; Karolina Lisy; Andrew Ward; Eli Ristevski; Melanie Clode; Kate Webber; Jon Emery; Maarten J Ijzerman; Nina Afshar; Jeremy Millar; Peter Gibbs; Sue Evans; Michael Jefford Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-03-12 Impact factor: 3.359