Literature DB >> 29377643

Causes of Congenital Malformations.

M Hassan Toufaily1,2, Marie-Noel Westgate1,2, Angela E Lin1,2,3, Lewis B Holmes1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many different causes of malformations have been established. The surveillance of a consecutive population of births, including stillbirths and elective terminations of pregnancy because of fetal anomalies, can identify each infant with malformations and determine the frequency of the apparent etiologies. This report is a sequel to the first such analysis in the first 10 years of this Active Malformations Surveillance Program (Nelson and Holmes, ).
METHODS: The presence of malformations was determined among 289,365 births over 41 years (1972-2012) at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. The abnormalities were identified from the review of the examination findings of the pediatricians and consultants and diagnostic testing for the live-born infants and the autopsies of the fetuses in elective terminations and stillbirths.
RESULTS: A total of 7020 (2.4%) infants and fetuses with one or more malformations were identified with these apparent etiologies in 26.6%: Mendelian disorders, including infants with postaxial polydactyly, type B; chromosome abnormalities; vascular disruption; complications of monozygous twinning; and environmental factors. The malformations of unknown etiology were a much larger group.
CONCLUSION: While several causes of malformations have been identified, many remain unexplained. Combining the ascertainment in a future surveillance programs with genome sequencing and chromosome microarray analysis will increase significantly the number of malformations attributed to genetic mechanisms. Birth Defects Research 110:87-91, 2018.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mendelian inheritance; chromosome abnormalities; environmental factors; twinning; vascular disruption

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29377643     DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res            Impact factor:   2.344


  11 in total

1.  Status of population-based birth defects surveillance programs before and after the Zika public health response in the United States.

Authors:  Marlene Anderka; Cara T Mai; Emily M Judson; Peter H Langlois; Philip J Lupo; Kimberlea Hauser; Jason L Salemi; Jane Correia; Mark A Canfield; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Etiology of Microcephaly and Central Nervous System Defects during the Zika Epidemic in Colombia.

Authors:  Romeo R Galang; Greace Alejandra Avila; Diana Valencia; Marcela Daza; Van T Tong; Antonio José Bermúdez; Suzanne M Gilboa; Angélica Rico; Jordan Cates; Oscar Pacheco; Christina M Winfield; Franklyn Prieto; Margaret A Honein; Liliana J Cortés; Cynthia A Moore; Martha L Ospina
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Limited surface examination to evaluate potential teratogens in a resource-limited setting.

Authors:  Lewis B Holmes; Hanah Z Nasri; Anne-Therese Hunt; Rebecca Zash; Roger L Shapiro
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Congenital absence of the nasal septum in a Nigerian newborn with multiple congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Isa Abdulkadir; Sani Musa; Fatima Lami Abdullahi; Laila Hassan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-07

5.  New PCNT candidate missense variant in a patient with oral and maxillofacial osteodysplasia: a case report.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Aoyama; Minoru Kimura; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Masahiro Uchibori; Rena Kojima; Yuko Osawa; Kazuyoshi Hosomichi; Yoshihide Ota; Masayuki Tanaka; Shiro Yamada; Gen Nishimura
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.103

Review 6.  Deciphering congenital anomalies for the next generation.

Authors:  Monica H Wojcik; Pankaj B Agrawal
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2020-10-07

7.  Prevalence of clinically-evident congenital anomalies in the Western highlands of Guatemala.

Authors:  Lester Figueroa; Ana Garces; K Michael Hambidge; Elizabeth M McClure; Janet Moore; Robert Goldenberg; Nancy F Krebs
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Prevalence of common aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Akiko Konishi; Osamu Samura; Jin Muromoto; Yoko Okamoto; Hironori Takahashi; Yasuyo Kasai; Mayuko Ichikawa; Naoki Yamada; Noriko Kato; Hiroshi Sato; Hiromi Hamada; Naoyuki Nakanami; Maya Machi; Kiyotake Ichizuka; Rei Sunami; Toshitaka Tanaka; Naoto Yonetani; Yoshimasa Kamei; Takeshi Nagamatsu; Mariko Matsumoto; Shinya Tairaku; Arisa Fujiwara; Hiroaki Nakamura; Takashi Harada; Takafumi Watanabe; Shoko Sasaki; Satoshi Kawaguchi; Sawako Minami; Masaki Ogawa; Kiyonori Miura; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Junya Kojima; Tomomi Kotani; Rumi Sasaki; Tsukasa Baba; Aya Toyofuku; Masayuki Endo; Naoki Takeshita; Takeshi Taketani; Masakatsu Sase; Keiichi Matsubara; Kei Hayata; Yoshinobu Hamada; Makiko Egawa; Toshiyuki Kakinuma; Sachio Matsushima; Michihiro Kitagawa; Tomomi Shiga; Ryuhei Kurashina; Hironori Hamada; Hiroaki Takagi; Akane Kondo; Norio Miharu; Michiko Yamashita; Madoka Horiya; Keiji Morimoto; Ken Takahashi; Aikou Okamoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.755

9.  Factors associated with fetal karyotype in spontaneous abortion: a case-case study.

Authors:  Qinghua Xu; Ying Chan; Yun Feng; Baosheng Zhu; Bicheng Yang; Shu Zhu; Lingyun Su; Li Zou; Na Feng; Yan Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 10.  Applications of Genome Editing Technology in Research on Chromosome Aneuploidy Disorders.

Authors:  Silvia Natsuko Akutsu; Kazumasa Fujita; Keita Tomioka; Tatsuo Miyamoto; Shinya Matsuura
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.