Literature DB >> 29377469

Component-resolved diagnostics demonstrates that most peanut-allergic individuals could potentially introduce tree nuts to their diet.

R Uotila1,2, A K Kukkonen1,2, W M Blom3, B Remington3, J Westerhout3, A S Pelkonen1,2, M J Mäkelä1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nut allergy varies from pollen cross-allergy, to primary severe allergy with life-threatening symptoms. The screening of IgE antibodies to a wide spectrum of allergens, including species-specific and cross-reactive allergens, is made possible via microarray analysis.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the association of variable IgE sensitization profiles to clinical response in peanut-challenged children and adolescents in a birch-endemic region. In addition, we studied the avoidance of tree nuts and species-specific sensitizations.
METHODS: We studied 102 peanut-sensitized patients who underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled challenge to peanut. We analysed ISAC ImmunoCAP microarray to 112 allergens, singleplex ImmunoCAPs for hazelnut Cor a 14 and cashew Ana o 3, and performed skin prick tests to peanut, tree nuts and sesame seed. We surveyed avoidance diets with a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Sensitization to PR-10 proteins was frequent (Bet v 1 90%), but equally high in the challenge negatives and positives. IgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 discriminated peanut allergic (n = 69) and tolerant (n = 33) the best. Avoidance of tree nuts was common (52% to 96%), but only 6% to 44% presented species-specific sensitizations to tree nuts, so a great number could potentially introduce these species into their diet. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PR-10-sensitizations were frequent and strong regardless of peanut allergy status. Component-resolved diagnostics can be employed to demonstrate to patients that sensitization to seed storage proteins of tree nuts is uncommon. Several tree nuts could potentially be reintroduced to the diet.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  avoidance diet; cross-reactivity; immuno solid-phase allergen chip; peanut allergens; seed storage protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29377469     DOI: 10.1111/cea.13101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  8 in total

1.  Allergy diagnosis from symptoms to molecules, or from molecules to symptoms: a comparative clinical study.

Authors:  N Mothes-Luksch; G Jordakieva; L Hinterhölzl; A N Jensen; P K Hallmann; M Kundi; E Jensen-Jarolim
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 2.  Recent advances in understanding and preventing peanut and tree nut hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Ayan Kusari; Allison Han; Lawrence Eichenfield
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-10-30

Review 3.  Component-Resolved Diagnosis in Food Allergies.

Authors:  Elisabetta Calamelli; Lucia Liotti; Isadora Beghetti; Valentina Piccinno; Laura Serra; Paolo Bottau
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 4.  Recent advances in the management of nut allergy.

Authors:  Elise Midun; Suzana Radulovic; Helen Brough; Jean-Christoph Caubet
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.084

5.  Ranking of 10 legumes according to the prevalence of sensitization as a parameter to characterize allergenic proteins.

Authors:  Mark Smits; Kitty Verhoeckx; André Knulst; Paco Welsing; Aard de Jong; Geert Houben; Thuy-My Le
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  Legume Protein Consumption and the Prevalence of Legume Sensitization.

Authors:  Mark Smits; Thuy-My Le; Paco Welsing; Geert Houben; André Knulst; Kitty Verhoeckx
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Peanut components measured by ISAC: comparison with ImmunoCap and clinical relevance in peanut allergic children.

Authors:  H K Brand; M W J Schreurs; J A M Emons; R Gerth van Wijk; H de Groot; N J T Arends
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2021-08-09

8.  Identification of Pru du 6 as a potential marker allergen for almond allergy.

Authors:  Stefan Kabasser; Christine Hafner; Sharon Chinthrajah; Sayantani B Sindher; Divya Kumar; Laurie E Kost; Andrew J Long; Kari C Nadeau; Heimo Breiteneder; Merima Bublin
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 13.146

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.