Literature DB >> 29377141

Evaluation of HPV type-replacement in unvaccinated and vaccinated adolescent females-Post-hoc analysis of a community-randomized clinical trial (II).

Penelope Gray1, Johanna Palmroth1, Tapio Luostarinen2, Dan Apter3, Gary Dubin4, Geoff Garnett5, Tiina Eriksson1, Kari Natunen1, Marko Merikukka6, Ville Pimenoff1,7, Anna Söderlund-Strand8, Simopekka Vänskä2,6, Jorma Paavonen9, Eero Pukkala1, Joakim Dillner2, Matti Lehtinen1,2.   

Abstract

Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines promises to control HPV infections. However, HPV vaccination programs may lay bare an ecological niche for non-vaccine HPV types. We evaluated type-replacement by HPV type and vaccination strategy in a community-randomized trial executed in HPV vaccination naïve population. Thirty-three communities were randomized to gender-neutral vaccination with AS04-adjuvanted HPV16/18 vaccine (Arm A), HPV vaccination of girls and hepatitis B-virus (HBV) vaccination of boys (Arm B) and gender-neutral HBV vaccination (Arm C). Resident 1992-95 born boys (40,852) and girls (39,420) were invited. 11,662 boys and 20,513 girls were vaccinated with 20-30% and 45-48% coverage, respectively. HPV typing of 11,396 cervicovaginal samples was performed by high throughput PCR. Prevalence ratios (PR) between arms and ranked order of HPV types and odds ratio (OR) for having multiple HPV types in HPV16 or 18/45 positive individuals were calculated. The ranked order of HPV types did not significantly differ between arms or birth cohorts. For the non-HPV vaccinated 1992-1993 birth cohorts increased PR, between the gender-neutral intervention versus control arms for HPV39 (PRA 1.84, 95% CI 1.12-3.02) and HPV51 (PRA 1.56, 95% CI 1.11-2.19) were observed. In the gender-neutral arm, increased clustering between HPV39 and the vaccine-covered HPV types 16 or 18/45 (ORA16  = 5.1, ORA18/45  = 11.4) was observed in the non-HPV vaccinated 1994-1995 birth cohorts. Comparable clustering was seen between HPV51 and HPV16 or HPV18/45 (ORB16  = 4.7, ORB18/45  = 4.3), in the girls-only arm. In conclusion, definitively consistent postvaccination patterns of HPV type-replacement were not observed. Future occurrence of HPV39 and HPV51 warrant investigation.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; randomized trial; type replacement; vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29377141     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  10 in total

1.  Evidence for cross-protection but not type-replacement over the 11 years after human papillomavirus vaccine introduction.

Authors:  Courtney Covert; Lili Ding; Darron Brown; Eduardo L Franco; David I Bernstein; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Decline in vaccine-type human papillomavirus prevalence in young men from a Midwest metropolitan area of the United States over the six years after vaccine introduction.

Authors:  Lea E Widdice; David I Bernstein; Eduardo L Franco; Lili Ding; Darron R Brown; Aaron C Ermel; Lisa Higgins; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  The Immune Microenvironment in Human Papilloma Virus-Induced Cervical Lesions-Evidence for Estrogen as an Immunomodulator.

Authors:  Jayshree R S
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  Bivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Effectiveness Correlates With Phylogenetic Distance From HPV Vaccine Types 16 and 18.

Authors:  Johannes A Bogaards; Pascal van der Weele; Petra J Woestenberg; Birgit H B van Benthem; Audrey J King
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Evidence for Missing Positive Results for Human Papilloma Virus 45 (HPV-45) and HPV-59 with the SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25 (Version 1) Platform Compared to Type-Specific Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assays and Impact on Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates.

Authors:  Kahren van Eer; Suzan Leussink; Tim T Severs; Naomi van Marm-Wattimena; Petra J Woestenberg; Johannes A Bogaards; Audrey J King
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  NanoString Technology for Human Papillomavirus Typing.

Authors:  Mangalathu S Rajeevan; Sonya Patel; Tengguo Li; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  Concurrent Infection With Multiple Human Papillomavirus Types Among Unvaccinated and Vaccinated 17-Year-Old Norwegian Girls.

Authors:  Ida Laake; Berit Feiring; Christine Monceyron Jonassen; John H O Pettersson; Torstein Gjølgali Frengen; Ingerid Ørjansen Kirkeleite; Lill Trogstad
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 7.759

8.  Frequency-dependent selection can forecast evolution in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Taj Azarian; Pamela P Martinez; Brian J Arnold; Xueting Qiu; Lindsay R Grant; Jukka Corander; Christophe Fraser; Nicholas J Croucher; Laura L Hammitt; Raymond Reid; Mathuram Santosham; Robert C Weatherholtz; Stephen D Bentley; Katherine L O'Brien; Marc Lipsitch; William P Hanage
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Population Impact of Girls-Only Human Papillomavirus 16/18 Vaccination in The Netherlands: Cross-Protective and Second-Order Herd Effects.

Authors:  Joske Hoes; Petra J Woestenberg; Johannes A Bogaards; Audrey J King; Hester E de Melker; Johannes Berkhof; Christian J P A Hoebe; Marianne A B van der Sande; Birgit H B van Benthem
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Human Papillomavirus Genotype Replacement: Still Too Early to Tell?

Authors:  Irene Man; Simopekka Vänskä; Matti Lehtinen; Johannes A Bogaards
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 5.226

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.