| Literature DB >> 29376914 |
Sunny Mak1, Nórida Vélez2, Elizabeth Castañeda3, Patricia Escandón4.
Abstract
The environmental isolation of Cryptococcus spp. is typically a difficult undertaking. Collecting samples in the field is costly in terms of travel, personnel time and materials. Furthermore, the recovery rate of Cryptococcus spp. may be very low, thereby requiring a large number of samples to be taken without any guarantee of success. Ecological niche modeling is a tool that has traditionally been used to forecast the distribution of plant and animal of species for biodiversity and conservation purposes. Here, we use it in a public health application to produce risk area maps for cryptococcal disease in Colombia. The Genetic Algorithm for Ruleset Production (GARP) was used to create models for Cryptococcus neoformans (C. neoformans) and Cryptococcus gattii (C. gattii), based on environmental sampling and clinical records data recorded since 1987. These maps could be used to focus public health messaging related to cryptococcal disease, and it enables us to characterize the ecological niche for Cryptococcus in Colombia. We found that the OPEN ACCESS J. Fungi 2015, 1 333 ecological niche for C. gattii in Colombia is quite diverse, establishing itself in sub-tropical and temperate ecoregions within the country. This suggests that C. gattii is highly adaptive to different ecological conditions in Colombia and different regions of the world.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptococcus; cryptococcal disease; ecological niche modeling; risk mapping
Year: 2015 PMID: 29376914 PMCID: PMC5753128 DOI: 10.3390/jof1030332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1(A) Environmental isolation of C. neoformans; (B) Environmental isolation and clinical cases of C. gattii infection. The departments of Colombia are labeled on the map.
List of environmental data layers used in the ecological niche models. Data layers with ≥80% training and testing accuracy for C. neoformans and C. gattii from the jack-knifing procedure are indicated (“yes”).
| Layer | Source | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual mean temperature | WorldClim | - | - |
| Mean diurnal range | - | - | |
| Isothermality | - | - | |
| Temperature seasonality | - | - | |
| Maximum temperature of warmest month | - | - | |
| Minimum temperature of coldest month | - | - | |
| Temperature annual range | - | - | |
| Mean temperature of wettest quarter | - | - | |
| Mean temperature of driest quarter | - | - | |
| Mean temperature of warmest quarter | - | - | |
| Mean temperature of coldest quarter | - | - | |
| Annual precipitation | - | yes | |
| Precipitation of wettest month | - | yes | |
| Precipitation of driest month | - | - | |
| Precipitation seasonality | - | - | |
| Precipitation of wettest quarter | - | yes | |
| Precipitation of driest quarter | - | - | |
| Precipitation of warmest quarter | - | - | |
| Precipitation of coldest quarter | - | yes | |
| January precipitation | - | - | |
| April precipitation | yes | yes | |
| July precipitation | yes | yes | |
| October precipitation | - | - | |
| Mean January maximum temperature | - | - | |
| Mean April maximum temperature | - | - | |
| Mean July maximum temperature | - | - | |
| Mean October maximum temperature | - | - | |
| Mean January minimum temperature | - | - | |
| Mean April minimum temperature | - | - | |
| Mean July minimum temperature | yes | - | |
| Mean October minimum temperature | yes | - | |
| Elevation | yes | - | |
| Aspect | derived from WorldClim | - | - |
| Slope | - | - | |
| Global land cover—2000 | Europa | - | - |
| Global land cover—SHARE 2014 | FAO | - | yes |
| Dominant soil type | - | - | |
| Maximum green vegetation fraction | USGS | - | yes |
Figure 2(A) Ecological niche model for C. neoformans; (B) Ecological niche model for C. gattii. The major ecoregions of Colombia are labeled on the map.
Environmental characterization of C. neoformans based on field observations and C. gattii based on field observations and clinical reports, and environmental characterization of C. neoformans and C. gattii based on ecological niche modeling (top quartile of models).
| Based on Field Observations | Based on Ecological Niche Modeling | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layer | Minimum | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | Mean | Maximum |
| Elevation (m) | 9 | 1425 | 2618 | 291 | 1673 | 3542 |
| April precipitation (mm) | 68 | 141 | 360 | 25 | 156 | 455 |
| July precipitation (mm) | 24 | 75 | 471 | 4 | 64 | 151 |
| Mean July minimum temperature (°C) | 8.0 | 15.4 | 22.9 | 3.3 | 13.6 | 22.9 |
| Mean October minimum temperature (°C) | 8.3 | 15.3 | 22.8 | 3.5 | 13.9 | 22.5 |
| Layer | Minimum | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | Mean | Maximum |
| April precipitation (mm) | 17 | 117 | 224 | 4 | 117 | 338 |
| July precipitation (mm) | 24 | 57 | 154 | 1 | 75 | 223 |
| Annual precipitation (mm) | 529 | 1016 | 1951 | 437 | 1095 | 1868 |
| Precipitation of wettest month (mm) | 101 | 147 | 267 | 59 | 159 | 357 |
| Precipitation of wettest quarter (mm) | 246 | 365 | 706 | 166 | 411 | 813 |
| Precipitation of coldest quarter (mm) | 31 | 234 | 634 | 1 | 226 | 702 |
| Maximum green vegetation fraction (%) | 23 | 58 | 99 | 1 | 90 | 100 |
| Land cover | 82% grassland, 12% tree cover, 3% cropland, 3% sparse vegetation | 48% tree cover, 34% grassland, 14% cropland, 2% shrubs, 1% waterbodies, 1% other | ||||