Nasreen Roberts1, Robert Nesdole2, Tina Hu3. 1. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Urgent Consult Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 2. Department of Psychiatry Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: a) to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of repeat-presentations to an adolescent urgent psychiatric clinic, and b) to compare them with single-time presentation. METHOD: This 18-month retrospective study compared repeat-presenters to age and gender matched single-time presenters. Demographic variables included age gender and ethnicity. Clinical variables included reason for referral, family history, diagnosis, recommendations and compliance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, McNemar's Chi-square tests for matched pairs, and conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 624 assessments 24% (N=151) were repeat-presentations. Compared with single-presentation, repeat-presentation group had a higher proportion of Aboriginal youth (X2 (1) = 108.28 p < 0.01), a higher proportion in special educational placement (X2 (1) = 6.82, p < 0.01), a higher proportion with a family history of anxiety disorders (X2 (1) = 10.62, p = 0.01) and substance use disorder (X2 (1) = 18.99, p < 0.01). Conditional logistic regression results suggested that repeat-presentation group had higher odds of past hospital admission (OR: 3.50, p < 0.01) higher odds of family history of mood disorders (OR: 4.86, p < 0.01) and of antisocial disorders (OR: 4.97, p = 0.02), and lower odds of recommendation compliance (OR: 0.10, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Repeat-presentations for urgent psychiatric consultation constitute a quarter of referrals to the urgent psychiatric clinic. Identifying and addressing factors that contribute to repeat-presentations may, assist in improving treatment compliance by ensuring focused interventions and service delivery for these youth. In turn, this will improve access to the limited urgent services for other youth.
OBJECTIVE: a) to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of repeat-presentations to an adolescent urgent psychiatric clinic, and b) to compare them with single-time presentation. METHOD: This 18-month retrospective study compared repeat-presenters to age and gender matched single-time presenters. Demographic variables included age gender and ethnicity. Clinical variables included reason for referral, family history, diagnosis, recommendations and compliance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, McNemar's Chi-square tests for matched pairs, and conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 624 assessments 24% (N=151) were repeat-presentations. Compared with single-presentation, repeat-presentation group had a higher proportion of Aboriginal youth (X2 (1) = 108.28 p < 0.01), a higher proportion in special educational placement (X2 (1) = 6.82, p < 0.01), a higher proportion with a family history of anxiety disorders (X2 (1) = 10.62, p = 0.01) and substance use disorder (X2 (1) = 18.99, p < 0.01). Conditional logistic regression results suggested that repeat-presentation group had higher odds of past hospital admission (OR: 3.50, p < 0.01) higher odds of family history of mood disorders (OR: 4.86, p < 0.01) and of antisocial disorders (OR: 4.97, p = 0.02), and lower odds of recommendation compliance (OR: 0.10, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Repeat-presentations for urgent psychiatric consultation constitute a quarter of referrals to the urgent psychiatric clinic. Identifying and addressing factors that contribute to repeat-presentations may, assist in improving treatment compliance by ensuring focused interventions and service delivery for these youth. In turn, this will improve access to the limited urgent services for other youth.
Entities:
Keywords:
adolescent; adolescents; mental health crisis; psychiatry; repeat-presentation; urgent consult
Authors: David C Sheridan; David M Spiro; Rongwei Fu; Kyle P Johnson; John S Sheridan; Alyssa A Oue; Wensi Wang; Rachel Van Nes; Matthew L Hansen Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Amanda S Newton; Samina Ali; David W Johnson; Christina Haines; Rhonda J Rosychuk; Rachel A Keaschuk; Philip Jacobs; Mario Cappelli; Terry P Klassen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Michele P Hamm; Martin Osmond; Janet Curran; Shannon Scott; Samina Ali; Lisa Hartling; Rebecca Gokiert; Mario Cappelli; Gary Hnatko; Amanda S Newton Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Sima Gandhi; Maria Chiu; Kelvin Lam; John C Cairney; Astrid Guttmann; Paul Kurdyak Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.356