| Literature DB >> 29375378 |
Xin-Yuan Lu1,2,3, Di Chen4, Xiao-Yuan Gu5, Jie Ding4, Ying-Jun Zhao4, Qian Zhao1,2,3, Ming Yao6, Zhiao Chen4, Xiang-Huo He4, Wen-Ming Cong1,2,3.
Abstract
The long-term survival rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poor. One of the reasons for the poor rate of survival is the high rate of recurrence caused by intrahepatic metastas is that adversely affects long-term outcome. Many studies have indicated that microRNAs play an important role in HCC, but there has been no research of clonal origins on recurrent HCC (RHCC) by analzing microRNAs. In the present study, we found that miR-483-5p was significantly upregulated in RHCC tissues of short-term recurrence (≤ 2 years) by miRNA microarray screening, and can significantly promote migration and invasion of HCC cells in vitro and increase intrahepatic metastasis in nude mice in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrated that activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM), which significantly suppressed migration and invasion of HCC cells, was a direct target of miR-483-5p, and the re-introduction of ALCAM expression could antagonize the promoting effects of miR-483-5p on the capacity of HCC cells for migration and invasion. In addition, expression level of ALCAM was negatively correlated with microvascular invasion and tumor size recognized as prognostic factors. The cases which were negative for ALCAM expression had shorter time to recurrence than positive cases, and univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that ALCAM was an independent risk factor of HCC recurrence. qRT-PCR and Western blotting showed that the expression of EMT related genes (MMP-2, MMP-9, E-caherin and vimentin) significantly changed as a result of interfering or overexpression of ALCAM, and ALCAM was significantly associated with EMT in HCC. These results suggest that the miR-483-5p/ALCAM axis is an important regulator in invasion and metastasis and biomarker for recurrence risk assessment of HCC.Entities:
Keywords: ALCAM; EMT; early recurrence; hepatocellular carcinoma; invasion and metastasis; miR-483-5p
Year: 2018 PMID: 29375378 PMCID: PMC5770356 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Expression of miR-483-5p in RHCC tissues and cells. (A) miRNAs array screened miRNA expression profiles. (B) Differential expression of miR-483-5p between two groups. (C,D) Transfection efficiency of miR-483-5p mimics in SK-Hep1/SMMC-7721 cells. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 2miR-483-5p promoted HCC cells migration and invasion. (A) miR-483-5p mimics promoted HCC cells migration. (B) miR-483-5p mimics promoted HCC cells invasion. (C) miR-483-5p inhibitor suppressed HCC cells migration. (D) miR-483-5p inhibitor suppressed HCC cells invasion. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 ×40.
Figure 3miR-483-5p promotes HCC cell invasion and metastasis in vivo, (A–F) showed intrahepatic metastasis and distant metastasis (lung) in Lenti-miR-483-5p mice. (A) Orthotopic primary liver tumor (white arrows) and intrahepatic metastatic nodules close beside tumor (black arrow). (B) Distant microvascular invasion in another liver lobe (black arrow). (C) Intrahepatic metastatic nodules close beside larger vein branch (black arrow). (D) Metastatic nodules invasion smooth muscular tissue near liver (black arrow). (E) Distant metastasis in the lung. (F) The numbers of metastatic nodules in the livers of each mouse are counted; the statistical significance is labeled using the 2 test. *p < 0.05, HE stained ×40.
Figure 4miR-483-5p post-transcriptionally downregulates ALCAM expression by directly targeting its 3′-UTR. (A) ALCAM mRNA levels were repressed by miR-483-5p in HCC cells. (B) ALCAM protein levels were repressed by miR-483-5p mimics in HCC cells. (C) ALCAM protein levels were up-regulated in HCC cells with miR-483-5p inhibitor. (D) Diagram of putative miR-483-5p binding sites in the 3′-UTR of ALCAM. The mutant sequences ALCAM 3′-UTR used in the luciferase reporter constructs are indicated in red. (E) Relative activities of luciferase reporters containing ALCAM 3′-UTR variants co-transfected with miR-483-5p or negative control mimics in HEK 293T cells. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5Knockdown of ALCAM can promote HCC cell migration and invasion. Restoration of ALCAM reverses miR-483-5p-mediated HCC cell migration and invasion. (A) Transwell migration assay of SK-Hep1 and SMMC-7721 showed transfection of ALCAM siRNAs promoted cell migration. (B) Transwell invasion assay showed transfection of ALCAM siRNAs promoted cell invasion. (C) The migration of HCC cells induced by miR-483-5p was restored via ALCAM re-introduction. (D) The invasion of HCC cells induced by miR-483-5p was restored via ALCAM re-introduction. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 ×40.
Figure 6Immunohistochemistry staining and microarray analysis of ALCAM in HCC patients and relationship of ALCAM and EMT related genes. (A) The positive staining of ALCAM was mainly located at the cellular membrane, compared with negative staining in HCC (B); (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation between ALCAM expression and the recurrence-free of patients with HCC. Log-rank tests were used to determine statistical significance. The expression of ALCAM was associated with the recurrence-free survival of patients with HCC, ALCAM negative cases had worse TTR than positive cases (log-rank test, p < 0.05). (D–G) Relative mRNA levels as measured by qPCR of the EMT related genes in SMMC-7721 cells transfected with si-NC or si-ALCAM (D,F) and infected with control and LV-ALCAM (E,G). (H) Western blot showed that the expression of ALCAM and the EMT markers in SMMC-7721 cells with ALCAM siRNAs or stably transfected with Lenti-ALCAM. *p < 0.05.
Relationship of ALCAM expression level with the clinicopathological features in HCC.
| ≤50 | 36 | 21 | 0.726 |
| >50 | 36 | 24 | |
| Male | 64 | 36 | 0.246 |
| Female | 4 | 5 | |
| – | 1 | 0 | 0.427 |
| + | 71 | 45 | |
| – | 15 | 7 | 0.541 |
| + | 47 | 30 | |
| – | 27 | 11 | 0.129 |
| + | 44 | 34 | |
| – | 51 | 40 | 0.029 |
| + | 20 | 5 | |
| ≤3 | 13 | 17 | 0.042 |
| >3 | 58 | 32 | |
| – | 60 | 28 | 0.016 |
| + | 12 | 16 | |
| – | 31 | 23 | 0.321 |
| + | 36 | 18 | |
| I–II | 12 | 6 | 0.627 |
| III–IV | 60 | 39 | |
Statistical analyses were done by the Chi-square (χ2) test. (
p < 0.05).
AFP, Alpha fetoprotein.
Multivariate analysis of factors influencing overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR).
| HBeAb (Pos vs. Neg) | 0.007 | 0.430 | 0.201 | 0.625 |
| AFP (Pos vs. Neg) | 0.102 | 1.866 | 1.083 | 2.915 |
| Serum albumin (low vs. nor) | 0.001 | 0.345 | 0.143 | 0.813 |
| Vascular invasion (yes vs. no) | 0.033 | 2.009 | 1.259 | 3.321 |
| ALCAM (Neg vs. Pos) | 0.022 | 1.876 | 1.096 | 3.211 |
| HBeAg (Pos vs. Neg) | 0.955 | 0.971 | 0.353 | 2.674 |
| HBeAb (Pos vs. Neg) | 0.084 | 0.406 | 0.146 | 1.130 |
OS, Overall survival; TTR, Time to recurrence.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.