Ying-Hwa Chen1,2, Shao-Sung Huang1,2, Shing-Jong Lin3,4. 1. Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine. 3. Department of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital. 4. Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term prognostic values of both thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events (GRACE) risk scores (RSs) to the Asian ethnicity. The purpose of this study is to compare the usefulness of these two scores in risk stratification and prediction of long-term (up to 3 years) outcomes for Chinese patients with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: We calculated the TIMI and GRACE RSs for 726 consecutive patients with MI [55.6% with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and 44.4% with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI)]. RESULTS: Although the risk profile of our population (median TIMI score = 5 for STEMI, 4 for NSTEMI, and median GRACE score = 164) was higher, the in-hospital mortality (7.1% for NSTEMI and 6.7% for STEMI) was comparable to that predicted by GRACE RS. The GRACE RS worked well in predicting short-term and long-term death (C-statistics range 0.710 to 0.789) and triple (death, MI, and stroke) endpoints (C-statistics range 0.695 to 0.764) in both subsets of MI. GRACE RS performed significantly better than the TIMIRS in predicting 3-year mortality in NSTEMI (p = 0.035) and 1-year and 3-year mortality in STEMI (p = 0.028 and 0.009, respectively). Stratification by tertiles of GRACERS furnished greater prognostic information versus risk assessment by the TIMI RS. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RSs revealed a fair to good discriminatory accuracy in predicting both short-term and long-term major adverse cardiac events in Asian patients with MI. Compared with the simpler TIMI RS, the GRACERS was more accurate in predicting long-term mortality.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term prognostic values of both thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events (GRACE) risk scores (RSs) to the Asian ethnicity. The purpose of this study is to compare the usefulness of these two scores in risk stratification and prediction of long-term (up to 3 years) outcomes for Chinese patients with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: We calculated the TIMI and GRACE RSs for 726 consecutive patients with MI [55.6% with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and 44.4% with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI)]. RESULTS: Although the risk profile of our population (median TIMI score = 5 for STEMI, 4 for NSTEMI, and median GRACE score = 164) was higher, the in-hospital mortality (7.1% for NSTEMI and 6.7% for STEMI) was comparable to that predicted by GRACE RS. The GRACE RS worked well in predicting short-term and long-term death (C-statistics range 0.710 to 0.789) and triple (death, MI, and stroke) endpoints (C-statistics range 0.695 to 0.764) in both subsets of MI. GRACE RS performed significantly better than the TIMIRS in predicting 3-year mortality in NSTEMI (p = 0.035) and 1-year and 3-year mortality in STEMI (p = 0.028 and 0.009, respectively). Stratification by tertiles of GRACERS furnished greater prognostic information versus risk assessment by the TIMI RS. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RSs revealed a fair to good discriminatory accuracy in predicting both short-term and long-term major adverse cardiac events in Asian patients with MI. Compared with the simpler TIMI RS, the GRACERS was more accurate in predicting long-term mortality.
Authors: E M Antman; M Cohen; P J Bernink; C H McCabe; T Horacek; G Papuchis; B Mautner; R Corbalan; D Radley; E Braunwald Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-08-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Frederick G Kushner; Mary Hand; Sidney C Smith; Spencer B King; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Steven R Bailey; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Donald E Casey; Lee A Green; Judith S Hochman; Alice K Jacobs; Harlan M Krumholz; Douglass A Morrison; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Eric D Peterson; Michael A Sloan; Patrick L Whitlow; David O Williams Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jean-Pierre Bassand; Christian W Hamm; Diego Ardissino; Eric Boersma; Andrzej Budaj; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Keith A A Fox; David Hasdai; E Magnus Ohman; Lars Wallentin; William Wijns Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-06-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Mandeep Singh; Guy S Reeder; Steven J Jacobsen; Susan Weston; Jill Killian; Véronique L Roger Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Keith A A Fox; Omar H Dabbous; Robert J Goldberg; Karen S Pieper; Kim A Eagle; Frans Van de Werf; Alvaro Avezum; Shaun G Goodman; Marcus D Flather; Frederick A Anderson; Christopher B Granger Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-10-10
Authors: Nagesh S Anavekar; John J V McMurray; Eric J Velazquez; Scott D Solomon; Lars Kober; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Harvey D White; Rolf Nordlander; Aldo Maggioni; Kenneth Dickstein; Steven Zelenkofske; Jeffrey D Leimberger; Robert M Califf; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jassim Al Suwaidi; Donal N Reddan; Kathryn Williams; Karen S Pieper; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Christopher B Granger; E Magnus Ohman; David R Holmes Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690