Gregory Charak1, Benjamin A Kuritzkes1,2, Ahmed Al-Mazrou2, Kunal Suradkar2, Neda Valizadeh2, Steven A Lee-Kong2, Daniel L Feingold2, Emmanouil P Pappou3. 1. NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Division of Colorectal Surgery, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1233 York Avenue, Room SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA. pappoue@mskcc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diverting ileostomies help prevent major complications related to anastomoses after colorectal resection but can cause metabolic derangement and hypovolemia, leading to readmission. This paper aims to determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use increased the risk of readmission, or readmission specifically for dehydration after new ileostomy creation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing diverting ileostomy at a tertiary-care hospital, 2009-2015. Primary outcome was 60-day readmission for dehydration; secondary outcomes included 60-day readmission for any cause, or for infection obstruction. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent diverting ileostomy creation, 59% with a primary diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The 60-day readmission rate was 36% (n = 36). Of readmitted patients, 39% (n = 14) were admitted for dehydration. Other readmission reasons were infection (33%) and obstruction (3%). The majority (64%, n = 9) of patients readmitted for dehydration were taking either an ACEi or an ARB. Compared to patients not readmitted for dehydration, those who were readmitted for dehydration were more likely to be on an ACEi or an ARB (11/85, 13% vs. 9/14, 64%). After controlling for covariates, ACEi or ARB use was significantly associated with risk of readmission (p < 0.0001, odds ratio = 13.56, 95% confidence interval 3.54-51.92,). No other diuretic agent was statistically associated with readmission for dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: ACEi and ARB use is a significant risk factor for readmission for dehydration following diverting ileostomy creation. Consideration should be given to withholding these medications after ileostomy creation to reduce this risk.
PURPOSE: Diverting ileostomies help prevent major complications related to anastomoses after colorectal resection but can cause metabolic derangement and hypovolemia, leading to readmission. This paper aims to determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use increased the risk of readmission, or readmission specifically for dehydration after new ileostomy creation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing diverting ileostomy at a tertiary-care hospital, 2009-2015. Primary outcome was 60-day readmission for dehydration; secondary outcomes included 60-day readmission for any cause, or for infection obstruction. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent diverting ileostomy creation, 59% with a primary diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The 60-day readmission rate was 36% (n = 36). Of readmitted patients, 39% (n = 14) were admitted for dehydration. Other readmission reasons were infection (33%) and obstruction (3%). The majority (64%, n = 9) of patients readmitted for dehydration were taking either an ACEi or an ARB. Compared to patients not readmitted for dehydration, those who were readmitted for dehydration were more likely to be on an ACEi or an ARB (11/85, 13% vs. 9/14, 64%). After controlling for covariates, ACEi or ARB use was significantly associated with risk of readmission (p < 0.0001, odds ratio = 13.56, 95% confidence interval 3.54-51.92,). No other diuretic agent was statistically associated with readmission for dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: ACEi and ARB use is a significant risk factor for readmission for dehydration following diverting ileostomy creation. Consideration should be given to withholding these medications after ileostomy creation to reduce this risk.
Authors: Charles N Kahn; Thomas Ault; Lisa Potetz; Thomas Walke; Jayne Hart Chambers; Samantha Burch Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Bradley J Hensley; Robert N Cooney; Nicholas J Hellenthal; Christopher T Aquina; Katia Noyes; John R Monson; Kristin N Kelly; Fergal J Fleming Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Ian M Paquette; Patrick Solan; Janice F Rafferty; Martha A Ferguson; Bradley R Davis Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Rachelle N Damle; Nicole B Cherng; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; Justin A Maykel; Paul R Sturrock; W Brian Sweeney; Karim Alavi Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Evangelos Messaris; Rishabh Sehgal; Susan Deiling; Walter A Koltun; David Stewart; Kevin McKenna; Lisa S Poritz Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Virginia O Shaffer; Tari Owi; Mathu A Kumarusamy; Patrick S Sullivan; Jahnavi K Srinivasan; Shishir K Maithel; Charles A Staley; John F Sweeney; Greg Esper Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: I Vogel; M Shinkwin; S L van der Storm; J Torkington; J A Cornish; P J Tanis; R Hompes; W A Bemelman Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 3.699