| Literature DB >> 29373484 |
Miguel Aguilar1, Alejandro González-Candia2, Jorge Rodríguez3,4, Catalina Carrasco-Pozo5,6, Daniel Cañas7, Claudio García-Herrera8, Emilio A Herrera9,10, Rodrigo L Castillo11.
Abstract
More than 140 million people live and works (in a chronic or intermittent form) above 2500 m worldwide and 35 million live in the Andean Mountains. Furthermore, in Chile, it is estimated that 55,000 persons work in high altitude shifts, where stays at lowlands and interspersed with working stays at highlands. Acute exposure to high altitude has been shown to induce oxidative stress in healthy human lowlanders, due to an increase in free radical formation and a decrease in antioxidant capacity. However, in animal models, intermittent hypoxia (IH) induce preconditioning, like responses and cardioprotection. Here, we aimed to describe in a rat model the responses on cardiac and vascular function to 4 cycles of intermittent hypobaric hypoxia (IHH). Twelve adult Wistar rats were randomly divided into two equal groups, a four-cycle of IHH, and a normobaric hypoxic control. Intermittent hypoxia was induced in a hypobaric chamber in four continuous cycles (1 cycle = 4 days hypoxia + 4 days normoxia), reaching a barometric pressure equivalent to 4600 m of altitude (428 Torr). At the end of the first and fourth cycle, cardiac structural, and functional variables were determined by echocardiography. Thereafter, ex vivo vascular function and biomechanical properties were determined in femoral arteries by wire myography. We further measured cardiac oxidative stress biomarkers (4-Hydroxy-nonenal, HNE; nytrotirosine, NT), reactive oxygen species (ROS) sources (NADPH and mitochondrial), and antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase, CAT; glutathione peroxidase, GPx, and superoxide dismutase, SOD). Our results show a higher ejection and shortening fraction of the left ventricle function by the end of the 4th cycle. Further, femoral vessels showed an improvement of vasodilator capacity and diminished stiffening. Cardiac tissue presented a higher expression of antioxidant enzymes and mitochondrial ROS formation in IHH, as compared with normobaric hypoxic controls. IHH exposure determines a preconditioning effect on the heart and femoral artery, both at structural and functional levels, associated with the induction of antioxidant defence mechanisms. However, mitochondrial ROS generation was increased in cardiac tissue. These findings suggest that initial states of IHH are beneficial for cardiovascular function and protection.Entities:
Keywords: heart; intermittent hypobaric hypoxia; oxidative stress; vascular response
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29373484 PMCID: PMC5855588 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Body and organs weight.
| Organs Weight | NN | % NN | IHH | % IHH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 445 ± 15 | - | 422 ± 13 | - |
| Heart (g) | 1.582 ± 0.071 | 0.355 ± 0.016 | 1.521 ± 0.049 | 0.359 ± 0.011 |
| Lung (g) | 2.631 ± 0.215 | 0.590 ± 0.048 | 2.021 ± 0.294 | 0.477 ± 0.069 |
| Spleen (g) | 1.115 ± 0.062 | 0.250 ± 0.013 | 1.347 ± 0.082 * | 0.318 ± 0.019 |
| Liver (g) | 12.483 ± 0.886 | 2.803 ± 0.199 | 10.968 ± 0.883 | 2.593 ± 0.209 |
| Left kidney (g) | 1.317 ± 0.051 | 0.295 ± 0.011 | 1.402 ± 0.152 | 0.314 ± 0.036 |
| Right kidney (g) | 1.369 ± 0.047 | 0.307 ± 0.010 | 1.329 ± 0.074 | 0.331 ± 0.017 |
Measurements of wet weights of organs in grams (g) at the end of the fourth cycle (post-mortem), and percentage (%) measurement according to final body weight. Groups are NN: Normobaric Normoxia, IHH: Intermittent Hypobaric Hypoxia. Data are expressed in mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences (* p ≤ 0.05) vs. Normobaric normoxia.
Echocardiographic variables in first and fourth cycle.
| Cardiac Parameters | NN1 | IHH1 | NN4 | IHH4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVDD (mm) | 7.139 ± 0.426 | 6.498 ± 0.374 * | 7.525 ± 0.166 | 5.957 ± 0.398 * |
| LVSD (mm) | 4.131 ± 0.334 | 2.965 ± 0.305 * | 3.987 ± 0.110 | 2.642 ± 0.396 * |
| IVSD (mm) | 1.571 ± 0.106 | 1.600 ± 0.108 | 1.762 ± 0.147 | 2.000 ± 0.121 |
| LVWD (mm) | 2.501 ± 0.291 | 3.151 ± 0.245 | 2.887 ± 0.161 | 3.014 ± 0.192 |
| LADD (mm) | 3.922 ± 0.135 | 3.527 ± 0.310 | 4.482 ± 0.110 | 3.857 ± 0.03 |
| ADD (mm) | 3.382 ± 0.247 | 3.015 ± 0.154 | 2.907 ± 0.165 | 2.437 ± 0.247 |
| Vmax (cm/s) | 83.41 ± 4.21 | 128.40 ± 4.71 * | 69.58 ± 2.66 | 139.05 ± 4.67 * |
| Vmed (cm/s) | 47.05 ± 3.46 | 72.84 ± 4.84 * | 50.97 ± 2.14 | 77.07 ± 4.54 * |
| GPmax (mmHg) | 2.832 ± 0.273 | 6.615 ± 0.511 * | 1.966 ± 0.144 | 6.941 ± 1.059 * |
| GPmed (mmHg) | 0.918 ± 0.131 | 2.227 ± 0.303 * | 1.467 ± 0.236 | 2.437 ± 0.247 * |
| E-Wave (cm/s) | 80.72 ± 7.76 | 56.93 ± 5.42 | 83.47 ± 6.62 | 86.47 ± 3.77 |
| HR (bpm) | 242 ± 19 | 243 ± 8 | 220 ± 11 | 261 ± 15 * |
Measurement of left ventricle diastolic diameter (LVDD), left ventricle systolic diameter (LVSD), interventricular septum during diastole (IVSD), left ventricular free wall in diastole (LVWD), left atrium diameter (LADD), and aortic diameter (ADD), all expressed in millimeters (mm); peak velocity (Vmax), mean velocity (Vmed), and E wave (E-Wave) measured in cm/s; peak systolic ejection gradient (GPmax), and mean systolic ejection gradient (GPmean) measured in mmHg; and heart rate measured in beats per minute (bpm), at the end of the first cycle and at the end of the fourth cycle. Groups are NN1: Normoxia after first cycle, IHH1: Hypoxia after fourth cycle; NN4: Normoxia after fourth cycle, IHH4: Hypoxia after fourth cycle. Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. Significant differences (* p ≤ 0.05) vs. Normobaric normoxia.
Figure 1Echochardiographic heart function. The left heart function was evaluated through the ejection fraction (EF%, (A,C)) and shortening fraction (SF%, (B,D)). The first measurement was performed following the first cycle of intermittent hypobaric hypoxia (A,B) and the second one was performed following the fourth intermittent hypobaric hypoxia (IHH) cycle (C,D). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. Significant differences (* p ≤ 0.05) vs. Normobaric normoxia.
Figure 2Femoral vascular function. Vasoconstriction was induced by KCl (A) and phenylephrine (PE, (B)). Maximum response is expressed in Emax and Kmax, sensibility is expressed by EC50 and pD2, respectively (inserted histograms). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. Significant differences (* p ≤ 0.05) vs. Normobaric normoxia.
Figure 3Stress-stretch curve for femoral arteries. Data are expressed in mean ± SEM for the curve progression.
Figure 4Antioxidant enzymes expression. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A); Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (B); Catalase (CAT) (C) protein expression; and densitometric assay (D). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. Significant differences (* p ≤ 0.05) vs. Normobaric normoxia.
Figure 5Reactive oxygen species generation. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was measured through DHE oxidation (mitochondrial source, (A)) and nicotinadine adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NADPH oxidase, (B)) in heart of rats. Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. Significant differences (* p ≤ 0.05) vs. Normobaric normoxia.
Figure 6Oxidative stress markers. Levels of nitrotyrosine-1 (NT1, (A)); nitrotyrosine-2 (NT2, (B)); and 4 Hydroxynonenal (4 HNE, (C)); and densitometric assay (D). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. Significant differences (* p ≤ 0.05) vs. Normobaric normoxia.