Literature DB >> 29373290

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Are Maintained at Mid-term Follow-up.

Gregory S DiFelice1, Jelle P van der List2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the mid-term clinical outcomes in patients with proximal avulsion anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears undergoing arthroscopic primary repair with suture anchors.
METHODS: The first 11 consecutive patients with proximal avulsion tears treated with arthroscopic primary repair were evaluated at mid-term (minimum 5-year) follow-up. Physical examination was performed; laxity examination consisting of the Lachman, pivot-shift, and anterior drawer tests was performed; and patients were asked to complete the Lysholm, modified Cincinnati, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires.
RESULTS: Of the 11 patients, 10 were seen at a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 1.5 years (range, 4.8-9.2 years). One patient was lost to follow-up, in whom failure had already occurred at short-term follow-up. One additional patient underwent reoperation for a medial meniscus tear and also had a partial ACL tear; this patient was clinically stable at last follow-up. All patients had full range of motion. Nine patients had negative Lachman and negative pivot-shift examination findings (IKDC score of A), and 1 patient had a 1A Lachman result and 1+ pivot-shift result (IKDC score of B). The mean Lysholm score was 96.0 ± 4.5 (range, 88-100); modified Cincinnati score, 95.6 ± 7.4 (range, 80-100); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, 95.4 ± 5.4 (range, 85-100); preinjury Tegner score, 7.2 ± 1.2 (range, 5-9); postoperative Tegner score, 6.6 ± 1.8 (range, 3-9); and IKDC subjective score, 92.3 ± 11.3 (range, 64-100).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears with suture anchors are excellent and are maintained at mid-term follow-up in a carefully selected subset of patients with proximal tears and excellent tissue quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29373290     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  20 in total

1.  ACL rupture in the immediate build-up to the Olympic Games: return to elite alpine ski competition 5 months after injury and ACL repair.

Authors:  Cesar Praz; Vikram Kishor Kandhari; Adnan Saithna; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-03-15

2.  Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: real innovation or reinvention of the wheel?

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Gregory S Difelice; Jelle P van der List; Atesch Ateschrang; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reply to the letter to the editor regarding our article "Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts eligibility for arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair".

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament primary repair rehabilitation.

Authors:  George Jm Hourston; Hadyn Kn Kankam; Stephen M McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-20

5.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting anterior cruciate ligament tear location and tear degree.

Authors:  Henry T Shu; Nicholas R Wegener; Katherine M Connors; Daniel S Yang; Stephen D Lockey; Jennifer M Thomas; Evan H Argintar
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-06

6.  Is Primary Arthroscopic Repair Using the Pulley Technique an Effective Treatment for Partial Proximal ACL Tears?

Authors:  Weixiong Liao; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 7.  Rehabilitation Principles to Consider for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Authors:  Jocelyn Wu; Jamie L Kator; Michael Zarro; Natalie L Leong
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  A Hybrid Repair Technique Combining Single-Bundle Reconstruction and Primary Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Kuangda Li; Liqiong Zhan; Qiong Han; Maohou Wu; Nanxin Zhang
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-06-09

9.  Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Douglas N Mintz; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-03-26

10.  Incidence and Risk Factors for a Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Progressing to a Complete Tear After Nonoperative Treatment in Patients Younger Than 30 Years.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Fayard; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Goran Vrgoc; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Geoffroy Dubois de Mont Marin; Benjamin Freychet; Thais D Vieira; Mathieu Thaunat
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.