Connor Kasik1, Michael G Saper2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McLaren Greater Lansing, Lansing, Michigan, U.S.A. 2. Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Seattle Children's, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.. Electronic address: Michael.Saper@seattlechildrens.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess the variability of the reporting of outcome measures after arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability in the adolescent population. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted investigating all studies reporting outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair in the adolescent population. Four databases (Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, and Google Scholar) were screened for clinical studies involving the arthroscopic management of anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. A full-text review of eligible studies was conducted. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the searched studies. A quality assessment was completed for each included study using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies instrument and the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine's Levels of Evidence Scale. RESULTS: We identified 8 eligible studies involving 274 patients (282 shoulders). There was considerable variation with regard to reported outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability in the adolescent population. The most common patient-reported outcomes included the Rowe Score (50%), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (37.5%), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Outcome Score (25%), and the Constant Score (25%). Clinical outcomes reported included recurrence (100%), return to sport (62.5%), patient satisfaction (37.5%), stability (37.5%), pain scores (37.5%), and range of motion (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in reported clinical outcome measurements after arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic shoulder instability in the adolescent population. This study supports the need for standardized outcome reporting after arthroscopic anterior shoulder instability surgery in adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.
PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess the variability of the reporting of outcome measures after arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability in the adolescent population. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted investigating all studies reporting outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair in the adolescent population. Four databases (Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, and Google Scholar) were screened for clinical studies involving the arthroscopic management of anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. A full-text review of eligible studies was conducted. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the searched studies. A quality assessment was completed for each included study using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies instrument and the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine's Levels of Evidence Scale. RESULTS: We identified 8 eligible studies involving 274 patients (282 shoulders). There was considerable variation with regard to reported outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability in the adolescent population. The most common patient-reported outcomes included the Rowe Score (50%), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (37.5%), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Outcome Score (25%), and the Constant Score (25%). Clinical outcomes reported included recurrence (100%), return to sport (62.5%), patient satisfaction (37.5%), stability (37.5%), pain scores (37.5%), and range of motion (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in reported clinical outcome measurements after arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic shoulder instability in the adolescent population. This study supports the need for standardized outcome reporting after arthroscopic anterior shoulder instability surgery in adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.
Authors: Mitchell I Kennedy; Colin Murphy; Grant J Dornan; Gilbert Moatshe; Jorge Chahla; Robert F LaPrade; Matthew T Provencher Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-05-30
Authors: Ahmad F Bayomy; Mark S Schickendantz; Isaac N Briskin; Lutul D Farrow; Lauren E Grobaty; Morgan H Jones; Brett W McCoy; Anthony Miniaci; Eric T Ricchetti; James T Rosneck; Elizabeth Sosic; Kurt P Spindler; Kim L Stearns; Greg J Strnad; James Williams; Paul M Saluan Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-12-29
Authors: Hassanin Alkaduhimi; James W Connelly; Derek F P van Deurzen; Denise Eygendaal; Michel P J van den Bekerom Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-04-06