Literature DB >> 29373232

An adaptive, real-time cadence algorithm for unconstrained sensor placement.

B T van Oeveren1, C J de Ruiter2, P J Beek3, S M Rispens3, J H van Dieën3.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates a new and adaptive real-time cadence detection algorithm (CDA) for unconstrained sensor placement during walking and running. Conventional correlation procedures, dependent on sensor position and orientation, may alternately detect either steps or strides and consequently suffer from false negatives or positives. To overcome this limitation, the CDA validates correlation peaks as strides using the Sylvester's criterion (SC). This paper compares the CDA with conventional correlation methods. 22 volunteers completed 7 different circuits (approx. 140 m) at three gaits-speeds: walking (1.5 m s-1), running (3.4 m s-1), and sprinting (5.2 and 5.7 m s-1), disturbed by various gait-related activities. The algorithm was simultaneously evaluated for 10 different sensor positions. Reference strides were obtained from a foot sensor using a dedicated offline algorithm. The described algorithm resulted in consistent numbers of true positives (85.6-100.0%) and false positives (0.0-2.9%) and showed to be consistently accurate for cadence feedback across all circuits, subjects and sensors (mean ± SD: 98.9 ± 0.2%), compared to conventional cross-correlation (87.3 ± 13.5%), biased (73.0 ± 16.2) and unbiased (82.2 ± 20.6) autocorrelation procedures. This study shows that the SC significantly improves cadence detection, resulting in robust results for various gaits, subjects and sensor positions.
Copyright © 2018 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Autocorrelation; Cadence; Cross-correlation; Gait cycle detection; Running; Stride frequency; Sylvester's criterion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29373232     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  2 in total

1.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Reliability and Validity of Running Cadence and Stance Time Derived from Instrumented Wireless Earbuds.

Authors:  Anouk Nijs; Peter J Beek; Melvyn Roerdink
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.