Literature DB >> 29372857

Early experience of placing image-guided minimally invasive pedicle screws without K-wires or bone-anchored trackers.

Gregory M Malham1, Rhiannon M Parker2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Image guidance for spine surgery has been reported to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and reduce revision rates and radiation exposure. Current navigation and robot-assisted techniques for percutaneous screws rely on bone-anchored trackers and Kirchner wires (K-wires). There is a paucity of published data regarding the placement of image-guided percutaneous screws without K-wires. A new skin-adhesive stereotactic patient tracker (SpineMask) eliminates both an invasive bone-anchored tracker and K-wires for pedicle screw placement. This study reports the authors' early experience with the use of SpineMask for "K-wireless" placement of minimally invasive pedicle screws and makes recommendations for its potential applications in lumbar fusion. METHODS Forty-five consecutive patients (involving 204 screws inserted) underwent K-wireless lumbar pedicle screw fixation with SpineMask and intraoperative neuromonitoring. Screws were inserted by percutaneous stab or Wiltse incisions. If required, decompression with or without interbody fusion was performed using mini-open midline incisions. Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring assessing motor and sensory responses with triggered electromyography (tEMG) was performed. Computed tomography scans were obtained 2 days postoperatively to assess screw placement and any cortical breaches. A breach was defined as any violation of a pedicle screw involving the cortical bone of the pedicle. RESULTS Fourteen screws (7%) required intraoperative revision. Screws were removed and repositioned due to a tEMG response < 13 mA, tactile feedback, and 3D fluoroscopic assessment. All screws were revised using the SpineMask with the same screw placement technique. The highest proportion of revisions occurred with Wiltse incisions (4/12, 33%) as this caused the greatest degree of SpineMask deformation, followed by a mini midline incision (3/26, 12%). Percutaneous screws via a single stab incision resulted in the fewest revisions (7/166, 4%). Postoperative CT demonstrated 7 pedicle screw breaches (3%; 5 lateral, 1 medial, 1 superior), all with percutaneous stab incisions (7/166, 4%). The radiological accuracy of the SpineMask tracker was 97% (197/204 screws). No patients suffered neural injury or required postoperative screw revision. CONCLUSIONS The noninvasive cutaneous SpineMask tracker with 3D image guidance and tEMG monitoring provided high accuracy (97%) for percutaneous pedicle screw placement via stab incisions without K-wires.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; K-wireless; LED = light-emitting diode; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; MISS = minimally invasive spine surgery; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; image guidance; navigation; neuromonitoring; pedicle screw; percutaneous; surgical technique; tEMG = triggered electromyography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372857     DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Yahya A Othman; Sohrab S Virk; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  Negotiating for new technologies: guidelines for the procurement of assistive technologies in spinal surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Vincent J Rossi; Thomas A Wells-Quinn; Gregory M Malham
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06

3.  Preclinical evaluation of a prototype freehand drill video guidance system for orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Niral Sheth; Prasad Vagdargi; Alejandro Sisniega; Ali Uneri; Gregory Osgood; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-08-26

4.  A minimally invasive, 3D-fluoroscopy-navigation-guided, 3D-controlled pedicle approach in spine surgery: first reliable results and impact on patient safety.

Authors:  André El Saman; Simon Lars Meier; Ingo Marzi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Multi-view 3D skin feature recognition and localization for patient tracking in spinal surgery applications.

Authors:  Francesca Manni; Marco Mamprin; Ronald Holthuizen; Caifeng Shan; Gustav Burström; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Erik Edström; Svitlana Zinger; Peter H N de With
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 6.  Narrative review of intraoperative imaging guidance for decompression-only surgery.

Authors:  Sohrab Virk; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

7.  Surface Navigation and the Influence of Navigation on MIS Surgery.

Authors:  Ram K Alluri; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Avani S Vaishnav; Marcel Dupont; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04

8.  Use of intraoperative navigation for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery is safe to consider.

Authors:  Harold G Moore; Andre M Samuel; Patrick J Burroughs; Neil Pathak; Dominick A Tuason; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-06

9.  Surgical Navigation, Augmented Reality, and 3D Printing for Hard Palate Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma En-Bloc Resection: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Mónica García-Sevilla; Rafael Moreta-Martinez; David García-Mato; Gema Arenas de Frutos; Santiago Ochandiano; Carlos Navarro-Cuéllar; Guillermo Sanjuán de Moreta; Javier Pascau
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.