Literature DB >> 29372344

"We get them up, moving, and out the door. How do we get them to do what is recommended?" Using behaviour change theory to put exercise evidence into action for rehabilitation professionals.

Caitlin McArthur1,2,3, Christina Ziebart4, Alexandra Papaioannou5,6, Angela M Cheung7, Judi Laprade7,8, Linda Lee9, Ravi Jain8, Lora M Giangregorio4,5,10,11.   

Abstract

Recommendations suggest a multicomponent exercise for people with osteoporosis. We identified rehabilitation professionals' barriers and facilitators to implementing exercise recommendations with people with osteoporosis, and used those to make suggestions for targeted knowledge translation interventions. Future work will report on development and evaluation of the interventions informed by our study.
PURPOSE: Rehabilitation professionals can help people with osteoporosis to engage in a multicomponent exercise program and perform activities of daily living safely. However, rehabilitation professional face barriers to implementing exercise evidence, especially for specific disease conditions like osteoporosis. We performed a behavioural analysis and identified rehabilitation professionals' barriers to and facilitators of implementing disease-specific physical activity and exercise recommendations (Too Fit to Fracture recommendations), and used the Behaviour Change Wheel to select interventions.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with rehabilitation professionals, including physical therapists, kinesiologists, and occupational therapists, and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers coded data and identified emerging themes. Using the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, themes were categorized into capability, opportunity, and motivation, and relevant interventions were identified.
RESULTS: Ninety-four rehabilitation professionals (mean age 40.5 years, 88.3% female) participated. Identified barriers were as follows: capability-lack of training in behaviour change, how to modify recommendations for physical and cognitive impairments; opportunity-lack of resources, time, and team work; motivation-lack of trust between providers, fear in providing interventions that may cause harm. Interventions selected were as follows: education, training, enablement, modelling and persuasion. Policy categories are communication/marketing, guidelines, service provision and environmental/social planning.
CONCLUSIONS: Key barriers to implementing the recommendations are rehabilitation professionals' ability to use behaviour change techniques, to modify the recommendations for physical and cognitive limitations and to feel comfortable with delivering challenging but safe interventions for people with osteoporosis, and lacking trust and team work across sectors. Future work will report on development and evaluation of knowledge translation interventions informed by our study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidelines; Health care provider; Implementation science; Knowledge translation; Osteoporosis; Physical activity; Physical therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372344     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0419-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  1 in total

1.  An Interpretive Descriptive Approach to Understanding Osteoporosis Management from the Perspective of People at Risk of Fracturing.

Authors:  Christina Ziebart; Joy MacDermid; Rochelle Furtado; Mike Szekeres; Nina Suh; Aliya Khan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.314

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.