Literature DB >> 29372260

Comparison of outcome measures from different pathways following total knee arthroplasty.

Hiok Yang Chan1, Rehena Sultana2, Seng Jin Yeo1, Shi-Lu Chia1, Hee Nee Pang1, Ngai Nung Lo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The benefits of extended inpatient rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in local community hospitals (CHs) are unproven. Our study compared functional outcomes between patients discharged home and to CHs following TKA.
METHODS: A case-control study was conducted of patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA. Consecutive patients (n = 1,065) were retrospectively reviewed using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSCRS), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) preoperatively, and at the six-month and two-year follow-ups.
RESULTS: Overall, 967 (90.8%) patients were discharged home and 98 (9.2%) to CHs. CH patients were older (mean age 70.7 vs. 67.2 years; p < 0.0001), female (86.7% vs. 77.5%; p = 0.0388) and less educated (primary education and above: 61.7% vs. 73.8%; p = 0.0081). Median CH length of stay was 23.0 (range 17.0-32.0) days. Significant predictors of discharge destination were older age, female gender, lower education, and poorer ambulatory status and physical health. Preoperatively, CH patients had worse KSCRS Function (49.2 ± 19.5 vs. 54.4 ± 16.8; p = 0.0201), SF-36 Physical Functioning (34.3 ± 22.6 vs. 40.4 ± 22.2; p = 0.0017) and Social Functioning (48.2 ± 35.1 vs. 56.0 ± 35.6; p = 0.0447) scores. CH patients had less improvement for all scores at all follow-ups. Regardless of preoperative confounders, with repeated analysis of variance, discharge destination was significantly associated with KSCRS, SF-36 and OKS scores.
CONCLUSION: Older, female and less educated patients with poorer preoperative functional scores were more likely to be discharged to CHs after TKA. At the two-year follow-up, patients in CHs had less improvement in functional outcomes than those discharged home. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community hospital; discharge location; functional outcomes; rehabilitation; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372260      PMCID: PMC6158141          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2018011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  28 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness and practice variation of rehabilitation after joint replacement.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Comparison of day rehabilitation to skilled nursing facility for the rehabilitation for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bess Kathrins; Richard Kathrins; Robert Marsico; Michael Frank; Brenda Stevenson-Marshall; Fabio Orozco; Alvin Ong
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Total joint arthroplasty: a comparison of postacute settings on patient functional outcomes.

Authors:  M H Kelly; R M Ackerman
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.913

4.  Predicting discharge outcomes after total knee replacement using the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool.

Authors:  C Tan; G Loo; Y H Pua; H C Chong; W Yeo; P H Ong; N N Lo; G Allison
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Benefits of starting rehabilitation within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroplasty: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nuria Sánchez Labraca; Adelaida Maria Castro-Sánchez; Guillermo A Matarán-Peñarrocha; Manuel Arroyo-Morales; María Del Mar Sánchez-Joya; Carmen Moreno-Lorenzo
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  Selection of patients for inpatient rehabilitation or direct home discharge following total joint replacement surgery: a comparison of health status and out-of-pocket expenditure of patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kate L Tribe; Helen M Lapsley; Marita J Cross; Brett G Courtenay; Peter M Brooks; Lyn M March
Journal:  Chronic Illn       Date:  2005-12

7.  Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Harwood; C Jenkinson; A Gray; M Vessey; P Morgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

8.  Trends in length of stay, functional outcomes, and discharge destination stratified by disease type for inpatient rehabilitation in Singapore community hospitals from 1996 to 2005.

Authors:  Cynthia Chen; Gerald Choon-Huat Koh; Nasheen Naidoo; Angela Cheong; Ngan Phoon Fong; Yaoyuan Vincent Tan; Kin Ming Chan; Boon Yeow Tan; Edward Menon; Chye Hua Ee; Kok Keng Lee; Yee Sien Ng; David Koh; Kee Seng Chia; Yik Ying Teo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Comparison of home health care physical therapy outcomes following total knee replacement with and without subacute rehabilitation.

Authors:  Christopher E Chimenti; Gail Ingersoll
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.381

10.  Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in patients undergoing total knee replacement.

Authors:  Yu Ko; Ngai-Nung Lo; Seng-Jin Yeo; Kuang-Ying Yang; William Yeo; Hwei-Chi Chong; Julian Thumboo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Nonresilient Outcomes in Older Adults After Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Thomas Laskow; Jiafeng Zhu; Brian Buta; Julius Oni; Frederick Sieber; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Jeremy Walston; Patricia D Franklin; Ravi Varadhan
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.591

2.  Rehabilitation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kristin J Konnyu; Louise M Thoma; Wangnan Cao; Roy K Aaron; Orestis A Panagiotou; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Gaelen P Adam; Ethan M Balk; Dan Pinto
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.412

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.