Thomas S Lee1, Parul Goyal2, Chengyu Li3, Kai Zhao3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. 2. Syracuse Otolaryngology, PLLC, Syracuse, New York. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of nasal obstruction. Which portion of the inferior turbinates should be surgically addressed to improve nasal airflow has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to evaluate the airflow changes after reduction along different portions of the inferior turbinate. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Computed tomographic scans of 5 patients were selected. Seven CFD models were created for each patient: 1 unaltered and 6 various ITRs, including 3 one-third ITRs (anterior, middle, and posterior one-third); 2 two-thirds ITRs (anterior and posterior two-thirds); and 1 full-length ITR model. Total airflow rate and nasal resistance was obtained through CFD analysis, and regression analysis was performed on the increased nasal volume, locations, and nasal resistance for all 5 patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total airflow rate and nasal resistance was obtained through CFD analysis, and regression analysis was performed on the increased nasal volume, locations, and nasal resistance for all 5 patients. RESULTS: Full ITR over the whole length was consistently most effective to improve nasal airflow and resistance for all 5 patients (2 men and 3 women), adjusted for the volume. Regression analysis showed a strong linear (R2≥0.79) relationship between nasal volume changes and nasal airflow. However, the most effective location of partial turbinate reduction was not consistent among patients. Surprisingly, for some patients, posterior ITRs were more effective than anterior ITRs. The site of most effective partial ITR differed from 1 side to the other even in the same individual. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The effectiveness of partial ITR and target location likely depends on individual patient anatomy. The fact that full ITRs were consistently most effective and the linear regression between flow and nasal volume changes may indicate that the entire length of the IT has a functional impact on nasal airflow and resistance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
IMPORTANCE: Inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of nasal obstruction. Which portion of the inferior turbinates should be surgically addressed to improve nasal airflow has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to evaluate the airflow changes after reduction along different portions of the inferior turbinate. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Computed tomographic scans of 5 patients were selected. Seven CFD models were created for each patient: 1 unaltered and 6 various ITRs, including 3 one-third ITRs (anterior, middle, and posterior one-third); 2 two-thirds ITRs (anterior and posterior two-thirds); and 1 full-length ITR model. Total airflow rate and nasal resistance was obtained through CFD analysis, and regression analysis was performed on the increased nasal volume, locations, and nasal resistance for all 5 patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total airflow rate and nasal resistance was obtained through CFD analysis, and regression analysis was performed on the increased nasal volume, locations, and nasal resistance for all 5 patients. RESULTS: Full ITR over the whole length was consistently most effective to improve nasal airflow and resistance for all 5 patients (2 men and 3 women), adjusted for the volume. Regression analysis showed a strong linear (R2≥0.79) relationship between nasal volume changes and nasal airflow. However, the most effective location of partial turbinate reduction was not consistent among patients. Surprisingly, for some patients, posterior ITRs were more effective than anterior ITRs. The site of most effective partial ITR differed from 1 side to the other even in the same individual. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The effectiveness of partial ITR and target location likely depends on individual patient anatomy. The fact that full ITRs were consistently most effective and the linear regression between flow and nasal volume changes may indicate that the entire length of the IT has a functional impact on nasal airflow and resistance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Authors: D E Hornung; D A Leopold; S L Youngentob; P R Sheehe; G M Gagne; F D Thomas; M M Mozell Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 1987-02
Authors: Guillermo Maza; Chengyu Li; Jillian P Krebs; Bradley A Otto; Alexander A Farag; Ricardo L Carrau; Kai Zhao Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Zhenxing Wu; John R Craig; Guillermo Maza; Chengyu Li; Bradley A Otto; Alexander A Farag; Ricardo L Carrau; Kai Zhao Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Jennifer Malik; Andrew Thamboo; Sachi Dholakia; Nicole A Borchard; Sam McGhee; Chengyu Li; Kai Zhao; Jayakar V Nayak Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 3.858