Literature DB >> 29372201

High-precision modular microfluidics by micromilling of interlocking injection-molded blocks.

Crystal E Owens1, A John Hart.   

Abstract

Wider use and adaptation of microfluidics is hindered by the infrastructure, knowledge, and time required to build prototype systems, especially when multiple fluid operations and measurements are required. As a result, 3D printing of microfluidics is attracting interest, yet cannot readily achieve the feature size, smoothness, and optical transparency needed for many standard microfluidic systems. Herein we present a new approach to the design and construction of high-precision modular microfluidics, using standard injection-molded blocks that are modified using micromilling and assembled via elastically averaged contacts. Desktop micromilling achieves channel dimensions as small as 50 μm depth and 150 μm width and adhesive films seal channels to allow internal fluid pressure of >400 kPa. Elastically averaged connections between bricks result in a mechanical locating repeatability of ∼1 μm, enabling fluid to pass between bricks via an O-ring seal with >99.9% reliability. We demonstrated and tested block-based systems for generating droplets at rates above 9000 min-1 and COV <3%, and integrated optical sensors. We also show how blocks can be used to build easily reconfigurable interfaces with glass microfluidic devices and imaging hardware. Microfluidic bricks fabricated by FDM and SLA 3D printing cannot achieve the dimensional quality of molded bricks, yet 3D printing allows customized bricks to be integrated with standard LEGOs. Our approach enables a wide variety of modular microfluidic units to be built using a widely available, cost-effective platform, encouraging use in both research and education.

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372201     DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00951h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  23 in total

Review 1.  "Learning on a chip:" Microfluidics for formal and informal science education.

Authors:  Darius G Rackus; Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse; Nicole Pamme
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Pushbutton-activated microfluidic cartridge as a user-friendly sample preparation tool for diagnostics.

Authors:  Juhwan Park; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Microfluidics for the study of mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Christian M Griffith; Stephanie A Huang; Crescentia Cho; Tanmay M Khare; Matthew Rich; Gi-Hun Lee; Frances S Ligler; Brian O Diekman; William J Polacheck
Journal:  J Phys D Appl Phys       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.207

4.  On-the-fly exchangeable microfluidic nozzles for facile production of various monodisperse micromaterials.

Authors:  Tom Kamperman; Bas van Loo; Melvin Gurian; Sieger Henke; Marcel Karperien; Jeroen Leijten
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Microscale impeller pump for recirculating flow in organs-on-chip and microreactors.

Authors:  Sophie R Cook; Hannah B Musgrove; Amy L Throckmorton; Rebecca R Pompano
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Emerging Microfluidic and Biosensor Technologies for Improved Cancer Theranostics.

Authors:  David Caballero; Catarina M Abreu; Rui L Reis; Subhas C Kundu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Toward a modular, integrated, miniaturized, and portable microfluidic flow control architecture for organs-on-chips applications.

Authors:  Gürhan Özkayar; Joost C Lötters; Marcel Tichem; Murali K Ghatkesar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.258

8.  Modular and Self-Contained Microfluidic Analytical Platforms Enabled by Magnetorheological Elastomer Microactuators.

Authors:  Yuxin Zhang; Tim Cole; Guolin Yun; Yuxing Li; Qianbin Zhao; Hongda Lu; Jiahao Zheng; Weihua Li; Shi-Yang Tang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Making quantitative biomicrofluidics from microbore tubing and 3D-printed adapters.

Authors:  Giraso Keza Monia Kabandana; Adam Michael Ratajczak; Chengpeng Chen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 10.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.