| Literature DB >> 29371897 |
Patricia Barbarini Takaki1, Marilena Manno Vieira1, Angelica Veiga Said1, Silvana Bommarito1.
Abstract
Introduction Studies in the fields of voice and speech have increasingly focused on the vocal tract and the importance of its structural integrity, and changes in the anatomy and configuration of the vocal tract determine the variations in phonatory and acoustic measurements, especially in the formation of the formants (Fs). Recent studies have revealed the functional consequences arising from being overweight and having an accumulation of fat in the pharyngeal region, including obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and impacts on the voice. Objectives To assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and analysis of the speech. Methods This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (no. 288,430). The cohort consisted of 124 individuals aged between 18 and 45 with full permanent dentition and selected randomly. The participants underwent a brief medical history taking, BMI assessments and recording emissions of the sustained vowels /a/, /ε/, /i/, and /u/ by acoustic program PRAAT (v. 5.3.85, Boersma and Weenink, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Recordings were taken using a unidirectional microphone headset (model Karsect HT-9, Guangdong, China), with a condenser connected to an external sound card (USB-SA 2.0, model Andrea, PureAudio™, Pleasant Grove, UT, USA), to reduce noise. Results There was a significant correlation between BMI and formant 3 (F3) vowel /a/; however, there was a low degree of correlation intensity. Conclusions We did not observe a correlation between the BMI and the speech formants, but we believe there is a trend in this correlation that leads to changes in speech patterns with increases in BMI.Entities:
Keywords: adipose tissue; body mass index; pharynx; speech
Year: 2017 PMID: 29371897 PMCID: PMC5783680 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1809-4864
Body Mass Index Classification 12
| Degree of obesity | BMI value (kg/m 2 ) |
|---|---|
| Normality | 20.0–25.0 |
| Obesity class I | 25.1–29.9 |
| Obesity class II | 30.0–34.9 |
| Obesity class III | 35.0–39.9 |
| Obesity class IV | ≥40.0 |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Fig. 1Degree of correlation intensity.
Sample distribution by sex and BMI class
| Sex | Male | Female | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | Mean | N | % | Mean | |||
|
| 34 | 27% | 22.16 | 38 | 31% | 21.47 | 72 | |
|
|
| 26 | 21% | 27.29 | 14 | 11% | 27.10 | 40 |
|
| 7 | 6% | 32.18 | 4 | 3% | 31.91 | 11 | |
|
| 1 | 1% | 37.72 | 0 | 0% | 0.00 | 1 | |
|
| 0 | 0% | 0.00 | 0 | 0% | 0.00 | 0 | |
|
| 68 | 55% | 23.87 | 56 | 45% | 16.10 | 124 | |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Correlation of BMI with speech formants 1, 2, and 3, and vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/, according to sex
| Formants | BMI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | |||
| Correlation (r) |
| Correlation (r) |
| |
| F1 /a/ | −22.50% | 0.065 | 8.10% | 0.551 |
| F2 /a/ | 17.30% | 0.158 | 16.50% | 0.224 |
| F3 /a/ | 24.40% | 0.045 | −15.60% | 0.252 |
| F1 /i/ | −12.10% | 0.325 | 15.20% | 0.264 |
| F2 /i/ | −3.60% | 0.771 | −2.10% | 0.877 |
| F3 /i/ | 12.00% | 0.657 | 8.10% | 0.648 |
| F1 /u/ | −14.70% | 0.233 | 23.70% | 0.079 |
| F2 /u/ | −0.30% | 0.979 | −2.30% | 0.865 |
| F3 /u/ | 8.50% | 0.494 | −2.10% | 0.878 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; F, formant.