| Literature DB >> 29371753 |
Aki Hirayama1, Shigeru Oowada2, Hiromu Ito3, Hirofumi Matsui3, Atsushi Ueda4, Kazumasa Aoyagi1.
Abstract
To clarify the clinical significance of the redox-controlling effects of Kampo, a traditional Japanese herbal medicine, we determined the scavenging activities of various reactive oxygen species in clinically used Kampo formulae using an electron spin resonance-based technique. Formulae containing Rhei Rhizoma (i.e., mashiningan and daiobotanpito) showed high scavenging activity against the alkoxyl radical, and crude extract quantity was significantly correlated with scavenging activity. Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was positively correlated with the quantity of Zingiberis Rhizoma. Strong hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was also found in formulae containing both Bupleuri Radix and Scutellariae Radix, a widely used anti-inflammatory combination. Formulae containing a clinically common combination of Scutellariae Radix, Coptidis Rhizoma, and Phellodendri Cortex induced high superoxide scavenging activity. Singlet oxygen scavenging activity was high in formulae containing Bupleuri Radix and Glycyrrhizae Radix. In contrast, formulae containing Rehmanniae Radix showed generally low reactive oxygen species scavenging activities, and the quantity of Rehmanniae Radix was negatively correlated with hydroxyl radical and singlet oxygen scavenging activities. These results indicate that the antioxidative effects of Kampo formulae are not uniform but complexly varied against multiple reactive oxygen species. Some formulae have almost no antioxidant effects but may act as pro-oxidants.Entities:
Keywords: Bupleuri Radix; Kampo, traditional Japanese herbal medicine; Rehmanniae Radix; hydroxyl radical; multiple radical scavenging activity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29371753 PMCID: PMC5773833 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.17-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
List of Kampo formulae and their abbreviations
| Name | Abbr. | Name | Abbr. | Name | Abbr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bakumondoto | BAK | kakkontokasenkyushin'i | KTSS | saikokeishito | SAKT |
| bofutsushosan | BTS | kamikihito | KKT | saikoseikanto | SSET |
| boiohito | BOT | kamishoyosan | KSS | saireito | SRT |
| daikenchuto | DKT | keigairengyoto | KRT | shimbuto | SIT |
| daiobotanpito | DBT | keishibukuryogan | KBG | shimotsuto | SMT |
| daiokanzoto | DKZT | keishikajutsubuto | KSTJB | shokenchuto | SHKT |
| daisaikoto | DST | keishikaryukotsuboreito | KSTRB | shosaikoto | SSK |
| goreisan | GRS | keishito | KST | shoseiryuto | SST |
| goshajinkigan | GJG | maoto | MT | tokiinshi | TKI |
| goshuyuto | GSY | mashiningan | MNG | tokishakuyakusan | TSS |
| hachimijiogan | HJG | ninjinto | NT | tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto | TSGST |
| hangekobokuto | HKT | orengedokuto | OGT | tsudosan | TDS |
| hangeshoshinto | HST | rikkunshito | RKT | unseiin | USI |
| hochuekkito | HET | rokumigan | RJG | yokuininto | YT |
| jumihaidokuto | JHT | saibokuto | SBT | yokukansan | YKS |
| juzentaihoto | JTT | saikokaryukotsuboreito | SRB | ||
| kakkonto | KT | saikokeishikankyoto | SAKK |
Abbr.: abbreviation
List of Kampo formulae and their composition of crude extracts. The crude amounts are indicated as daily dose
| Name | Major components (gram per daily dose) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abbreviation | Scutellariae Radix | Phellodendri Cortex | Coptidis Rhizoma | Zingiberis Processum Rhizoma | Glycyrrhizae Radix | Bupleuri Radix | Rehmanniae Radix | Paeoniae Radix | Zingiberis Rhizoma | Rhei Rhizoma | Atractylodes Lancea Rhizome | Processi Aconiti Radix | Ephedrae Herba | |
| bakumondoto | BAK | 2 | ||||||||||||
| bofutsushosan | BTS | 2 | 2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | |||||||
| boiohito | BOT | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||
| daikenchuto | DKT | 5 | ||||||||||||
| daiobotanpito | DBT | 2 | ||||||||||||
| daiokanzoto | DKZT | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| daisaikoto | DST | 3 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| goreisan | GRS | 3 | ||||||||||||
| goshajinkigan | GJG | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| goshuyuto | GSY | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
| hachimijiogan | HJG | 6 | 0.5 | |||||||||||
| hangekobokuto | HKT | 1 | ||||||||||||
| hangeshoshinto | HST | 2.5 | 1 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |||||||||
| hochuekkito | HET | 1.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | |||||||||
| jumihaidokuto | JHT | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||
| juzentaihoto | JTT | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
| kakkonto | KT | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
| kakkontokasenkyushin'i | KTSS | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
| kamikihito | KKT | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
| kamishoyosan | KSS | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
| keigairengyoto | KRT | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | ||||||
| keishibukuryogan | KBG | 3 | ||||||||||||
| keishikajutsubuto | KSTJB | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.5 | ||||||||
| keishikaryukotsuboreito | KSTRB | 2 | 4 | 1.5 | ||||||||||
| keishito | KST | 2 | 4 | 1.5 | ||||||||||
| maoto | MT | 1.5 | 5 | |||||||||||
| mashiningan | MNG | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| ninjinto | NT | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||
| orengedokuto | OGT | 3 | 1.5 | 2 | ||||||||||
| rikkunshito | RKT | 1 | 0.5 | 4 | ||||||||||
| rokumigan | RJG | 5 | ||||||||||||
| saibokuto | SBT | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | |||||||||
| saikokaryukotsuboreito | SRB | 2.5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| saikokeishikankyoto | SAKK | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||
| saikokeishito | SAKT | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||
| saikoseikanto | SSET | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | ||||||
| saireito | SRT | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
| shimbuto | SIT | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 0.5 | |||||||||
| shimotsuto | SMT | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| shokenchuto | SHKT | 2 | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||
| shosaikoto | SSK | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | |||||||||
| shoseiryuto | SST | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
| tokiinshi | TKI | 1 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||
| tokishakuyakusan | TSS | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto | TSGST | 2 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||
| tsudosan | TDS | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||
| unseiin | USI | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| yokuininto | YT | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
| yokukansan | YKS | 1.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||
Photolytic production methods of multiple reactive oxygen species
| Free radical | Spin trap | Precursor/Sensitizer | UV/VL | Irradiation period | Antioxiidant equivalent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| •OH | CYPMPO | H2O2 10 mM | UV | 5 s | GSH |
| O2•− | CYPMPO | Riboflavin 20 µM | VL | 60 s | SOD |
| RO• | CYPMPO | AAPH 10 mM | UV | 5 s | Trolox |
| ROO• | CYPMPO | UV | 5 s | α-lipoic acid | |
| 1O2 | TMPO | Rosebengal 200 µM | VL | 30 s | GSH |
UV, ultraviolet (300–400 nm); VL, visual light (500–600 nm); CYPMPO, 5-(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propoxy cyclophosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide; AAPH, 2,2'-azobis (2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride; tert-BHP, tert-butyl hydroperoxide; GSH, glutathione; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TMPO, 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine.
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of Kampo formulae
| Kampo formula | •OH scavenging activity (mM-GSH | |
|---|---|---|
| per daily dose | per gram | |
| shosaikoto | 703.1 | 93.7 |
| saikokaryukotsuboreito | 690.3 | 92.0 |
| unseiin | 663.0 | 88.4 |
| daisaikoto | 521.8 | 69.6 |
| kakkonto | 397.3 | 53.0 |
| daiokanzoto | 393.7 | 52.5 |
| bakumondoto | 382.2 | 42.5 |
| ninjinto | 376.0 | 50.1 |
| kakkontokasenkyushin'i | 375.0 | 50.0 |
| saikokeishito | 372.3 | 49.6 |
| orengedokuto | 349.6 | 46.6 |
| keishito | 348.9 | 46.5 |
| keishikaryukotsuboreito | 347.0 | 46.3 |
| keishikajutsubuto | 339.8 | 45.3 |
| goreisan | 339.8 | 45.3 |
| boiohito | 336.8 | 44.9 |
| shimbuto | 335.6 | 44.7 |
| hangekobokuto | 335.1 | 44.7 |
| mashiningan | 325.1 | 43.3 |
| jyuzendaihoto | 323.9 | 43.2 |
| bofutsushosan | 321.3 | 42.8 |
| saikoseikanto | 310.4 | 41.4 |
| tsudosan | 308.5 | 41.1 |
| daiobotanbito | 301.2 | 40.2 |
| jumihaidokuto | 301.2 | 40.2 |
| yokkansan | 296.8 | 39.6 |
| keigairengyoto | 294.3 | 39.2 |
| shokenchuto | 294.2 | 19.6 |
| goshuyuto | 294.0 | 39.2 |
| shimotsuto | 292.3 | 39.0 |
| saikokeishikankyoto | 292.2 | 39.0 |
| hangeshashinto | 292.1 | 38.9 |
| rikkunshito | 282.5 | 37.7 |
| tokiinshi | 280.4 | 37.4 |
| kamishoyosan | 265.7 | 35.4 |
| hachimijiogan | 264.1 | 35.2 |
| kamikihito | 261.2 | 34.8 |
| goshajinkigan | 259.6 | 34.6 |
| tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto | 255.7 | 34.1 |
| tokishakuyakusan | 251.2 | 33.5 |
| keishibukuryogan | 250.2 | 33.4 |
| saibokuto | 244.4 | 32.6 |
| daikenchuto | 242.1 | 16.1 |
| saireito | 232.3 | 25.8 |
| yokuininto | 231.8 | 30.9 |
| maoto | 231.6 | 30.9 |
| rokumigan | 225.7 | 30.1 |
| shoseiryuto | 98.4 | 13.1 |
| hochuekkito | 92.2 | 12.3 |
Fig. 1Correlation between hydroxyl radical scavenging activity and the amount of Zingiberis Rhizoma (a) and Rehmanniae Radix (b). r = 0.54, p<0.05 for Zingiberis Rhizoma and r = −0.75, p<0.05 for Rehmanniae Radix.
Alkoxyl radical scavenging activity of Kampo formulae
| Kampo formula | RO• scavenging activity (mM-TROLOX | |
|---|---|---|
| per daily dose | per gram | |
| daiokanzoto | 200.7 | 26.8 |
| mashiningan | 47.3 | 6.3 |
| orengedokuto | 32.3 | 4.3 |
| daiobotanbito | 32.2 | 4.3 |
| maoto | 25.7 | 3.4 |
| saikokeishikankyoto | 17.0 | 2.3 |
| unseiin | 14.9 | 2.0 |
| yokuininto | 12.5 | 1.7 |
| saikoseikanto | 11.9 | 1.6 |
| bofutsushosan | 9.2 | 1.2 |
| kakkontokasenkyushin'i | 9.2 | 1.2 |
| tsudosan | 8.7 | 1.2 |
| keigairengyoto | 8.4 | 1.1 |
| hangeshashinto | 6.8 | 0.9 |
| keishibukuryogan | 6.5 | 0.9 |
| saibokuto | 5.9 | 0.8 |
| daisaikoto | 5.3 | 0.7 |
| hochuekkito | 4.8 | 0.6 |
| hangekobokuto | 4.8 | 0.6 |
| saikokaryukotsuboreito | 4.8 | 0.6 |
| ninjinto | 4.5 | 0.6 |
| kakkonto | 4.2 | 0.6 |
| daikenchuto | 4.2 | 0.3 |
| shosaikoto | 4.2 | 0.6 |
| shokenchuto | 4.1 | 0.3 |
| yokkansan | 4.1 | 0.5 |
| saikokeishito | 3.9 | 0.5 |
| keishito | 3.8 | 0.5 |
| saireito | 3.7 | 0.4 |
| keishikaryukotsuboreito | 3.5 | 0.5 |
| keishikajutsubuto | 3.1 | 0.4 |
| boiohito | 3.1 | 0.4 |
| goshuyuto | 3.1 | 0.4 |
| rokumigan | 3.0 | 0.4 |
| tokiinshi | 2.8 | 0.4 |
| jyuzendaihoto | 2.7 | 0.4 |
| rikkunshito | 2.6 | 0.3 |
| kamishoyosan | 2.5 | 0.3 |
| kamikihito | 2.4 | 0.3 |
| shimbuto | 2.4 | 0.3 |
| goshajinkigan | 2.3 | 0.3 |
| shimotsuto | 2.3 | 0.3 |
| shoseiryuto | 2.2 | 0.3 |
| jumihaidokuto | 1.8 | 0.2 |
| bakumondoto | 1.8 | 0.2 |
| tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto | 1.7 | 0.2 |
| tokishakuyakusan | 1.7 | 0.2 |
| goreisan | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| hachimijiogan | 0.9 | 0.1 |
Fig. 2Correlation between alkoxyl radical scavenging activity and the amount of Rhei Rhizoma (r = 0.87, p<0.05).
Alkylperoxyl radical scavenging activity of Kampo formulae
| Kampo formula | ROO• scavenging activity (mM-aLA | |
|---|---|---|
| per daily dose | per gram | |
| kakkontokasenkyushin'i | 148.4 | 19.8 |
| maoto | 117.4 | 15.7 |
| keishikaryukotsuboreito | 90.8 | 12.1 |
| saibokuto | 89.6 | 12.0 |
| hangekobokuto | 86.3 | 11.5 |
| mashiningan | 86.0 | 11.5 |
| hochuekkito | 85.6 | 11.4 |
| goreisan | 81.1 | 10.8 |
| keishikajutsubuto | 79.0 | 10.5 |
| saikokeishito | 76.9 | 10.2 |
| yokkansan | 74.1 | 9.9 |
| jyuzendaihoto | 72.5 | 9.7 |
| unseiin | 71.8 | 9.6 |
| ninjinto | 71.7 | 9.6 |
| yokuininto | 70.6 | 9.4 |
| keigairengyoto | 69.8 | 9.3 |
| saikokeishikankyoto | 68.8 | 9.2 |
| daiokanzoto | 63.5 | 8.5 |
| keishito | 62.8 | 8.4 |
| orengedokuto | 59.1 | 7.9 |
| daiobotanbito | 58.2 | 7.8 |
| saikoseikanto | 54.7 | 7.3 |
| rokumigan | 53.5 | 7.1 |
| tsudosan | 53.4 | 7.1 |
| kamikihito | 53.4 | 7.1 |
| shosaikoto | 52.8 | 7.0 |
| saireito | 52.8 | 5.9 |
| saikokaryukotsuboreito | 52.4 | 7.0 |
| jumihaidokuto | 51.3 | 6.8 |
| goshuyuto | 50.3 | 6.7 |
| daisaikoto | 49.7 | 6.6 |
| shimbuto | 49.7 | 6.6 |
| kamishoyosan | 49.3 | 6.6 |
| keishibukuryogan | 49.0 | 6.5 |
| goshajinkigan | 48.7 | 6.5 |
| hachimijiogan | 48.0 | 6.4 |
| tokishakuyakusan | 47.9 | 6.4 |
| tokiinshi | 47.5 | 6.3 |
| bofutsushosan | 47.1 | 6.3 |
| boiohito | 46.6 | 6.2 |
| rikkunshito | 44.1 | 5.9 |
| tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto | 42.9 | 5.7 |
| daikenchuto | 42.6 | 2.8 |
| shimotsuto | 42.4 | 5.7 |
| shokenchuto | 41.8 | 2.8 |
| hangeshashinto | 41.0 | 5.5 |
| kakkonto | 41.0 | 5.5 |
| bakumondoto | 36.5 | 4.1 |
| shoseiryuto | 34.6 | 4.6 |
Fig. 3Correlation between alkylperoxyl radical scavenging activity and the amount of Rhei Rhizoma (r = 0.84, p<0.05).
Superoxide scavenging activity of Kampo formulae
| Kampo formula | O2•− scavenging activity (U/ml-SOD | |
|---|---|---|
| per daily dose | per gram | |
| orengedokuto | 3,522.3 | 469.6 |
| saikokaryukotsuboreito | 2,499.8 | 333.3 |
| unseiin | 2,321.0 | 309.5 |
| keigairengyoto | 1,482.9 | 197.7 |
| yokkansan | 1,400.1 | 186.7 |
| kakkontokasenkyushin'i | 1,107.3 | 147.6 |
| saireito | 1,036.4 | 115.2 |
| daiokanzoto | 1,023.3 | 136.4 |
| maoto | 991.3 | 132.2 |
| tokiinshi | 834.1 | 111.2 |
| tsudosan | 833.5 | 111.1 |
| saibokuto | 751.0 | 100.1 |
| goshajinkigan | 704.1 | 93.9 |
| shokenchuto | 698.5 | 46.6 |
| daisaikoto | 661.6 | 88.2 |
| kamikihito | 614.7 | 82.0 |
| rokumigan | 604.1 | 80.5 |
| hangeshashinto | 580.5 | 77.4 |
| hochuekkito | 540.2 | 72.0 |
| kakkonto | 538.9 | 71.9 |
| yokuininto | 525.4 | 70.1 |
| daikenchuto | 469.0 | 31.3 |
| mashiningan | 468.5 | 62.5 |
| keishibukuryogan | 454.4 | 60.6 |
| daiobotanbito | 444.4 | 59.3 |
| shoseiryuto | 423.4 | 56.5 |
| saikokeishikankyoto | 406.6 | 54.2 |
| goshuyuto | 394.8 | 52.6 |
| keishito | 382.9 | 51.0 |
| hangekobokuto | 359.8 | 48.0 |
| shosaikoto | 343.1 | 45.7 |
| ninjinto | 333.2 | 44.4 |
| bofutsushosan | 331.8 | 44.2 |
| shimotsuto | 313.5 | 41.8 |
| boiohito | 304.5 | 40.6 |
| keishikaryukotsuboreito | 299.5 | 39.9 |
| tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto | 287.8 | 38.4 |
| hachimijiogan | 277.0 | 36.9 |
| saikoseikanto | 269.0 | 35.9 |
| jumihaidokuto | 260.0 | 34.7 |
| keishikajutsubuto | 258.1 | 34.4 |
| goreisan | 251.1 | 33.5 |
| kamishoyosan | 240.0 | 32.0 |
| saikokeishito | 230.9 | 30.8 |
| rikkunshito | 198.4 | 26.5 |
| jyuzendaihoto | 187.4 | 25.0 |
| shimbuto | 179.7 | 24.0 |
| bakumondoto | 161.6 | 18.0 |
| tokishakuyakusan | 143.7 | 19.2 |
Singlet oxygen scavenging activity of Kampo formulae
| Kampo formula | 1O2 scavenging activity (µM-GSH | |
|---|---|---|
| per daily dose | per gram | |
| saikokeishikankyoto | 2,265.4 | 302.1 |
| daisaikoto | 1,410.9 | 188.1 |
| kakkonto | 1,356.2 | 180.8 |
| shosaikoto | 1,071.4 | 142.9 |
| goshuyuto | 977.9 | 130.4 |
| maoto | 742.3 | 99.0 |
| hangeshashinto | 732.4 | 97.6 |
| saibokuto | 705.7 | 94.1 |
| unseiin | 654.6 | 87.3 |
| saikoseikanto | 584.5 | 77.9 |
| daiobotanbito | 515.0 | 68.7 |
| bofutsushosan | 485.7 | 64.8 |
| keishibukuryogan | 475.1 | 63.4 |
| orengedokuto | 467.3 | 62.3 |
| kakkontokasenkyushin'i | 454.0 | 60.5 |
| hangekobokuto | 451.6 | 60.2 |
| shokenchuto | 408.1 | 27.2 |
| daiokanzoto | 386.4 | 51.5 |
| tsudosan | 350.5 | 46.7 |
| tokishigyakukagoshuyushokyoto | 338.5 | 45.1 |
| saikokaryukotsuboreito | 332.5 | 44.3 |
| keigairengyoto | 319.9 | 42.6 |
| yokuininto | 307.9 | 41.0 |
| saireito | 295.9 | 32.9 |
| keishito | 288.1 | 38.4 |
| ninjinto | 269.0 | 35.9 |
| daikenchuto | 243.8 | 16.3 |
| boiohito | 228.9 | 30.5 |
| rikkunshito | 205.7 | 27.4 |
| shoseiryuto | 172.2 | 23.0 |
| saikokeishito | 171.3 | 22.8 |
| jumihaidokuto | 163.1 | 21.7 |
| rokumigan | 131.6 | 17.5 |
| keishikaryukotsuboreito | 125.6 | 16.8 |
| kamishoyosan | 124.4 | 16.6 |
| keishikajutsubuto | 115.0 | 15.3 |
| jyuzendaihoto | 95.9 | 12.8 |
| hochuekkito | 91.1 | 12.1 |
| shimbuto | 82.6 | 11.0 |
| yokkansan | 68.6 | 9.1 |
| goreisan | 66.8 | 8.9 |
| shimotsuto | 66.0 | 8.8 |
| tokishakuyakusan | 65.4 | 8.7 |
| hachimijiogan | 58.7 | 7.8 |
| mashiningan | 40.8 | 5.4 |
| bakumondoto | 10.5 | 1.2 |
| tokiinshi | 8.0 | 1.1 |
| kamikihito | 6.6 | 0.9 |
| goshajinkigan | 6.0 | 0.8 |
Fig. 4Correlation between singlet oxygen scavenging activity and the amount of Bupleuri Radix (a) r = 0.57, p<0.05; Glycyrrhizae Radix (b) r = 0.40, p<0.05; and Rehmanniae Radix (c) r = −0.67, p<0.05).
Fig. 5Total ROS scavenging profile of representative Kampo formulae, namely daiokanzoto (DKZT) (a), orengedokuto (OGT) (b), saikokeishikankyoto (SAKK) (c), mashiningan (MNG) (d), maoto (MT) (e), and tsudosan (TDS) (f). The scavenging activities against each ROS are expressed as relative values in comparison with tsudosan.