| Literature DB >> 29371567 |
Marco J Hernández-Chávez1, Luis A Pérez-García2, Gustavo A Niño-Vega3, Héctor M Mora-Montes4.
Abstract
The recognition of fungal cells by the host immune system is key during the establishment of a protective anti-fungal response. Even though the immune system has evolved a vast number of processes to control these organisms, they have developed strategies to fight back, avoiding the proper recognition by immune components and thus interfering with the host protective mechanisms. Therefore, the strategies to evade the immune system are as important as the virulence factors and attributes that damage the host tissues and cells. Here, we performed a thorough revision of the main fungal tactics to escape from the host immunosurveillance processes. These include the composition and organization of the cell wall, the fungal capsule, the formation of titan cells, biofilms, and asteroid bodies; the ability to undergo dimorphism; and the escape from nutritional immunity, extracellular traps, phagocytosis, and the action of humoral immune effectors.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; Candida; Cryptococcus; Paracoccidioides; Sporothrix; cell wall; dimorphism; fungal pathogen; immune system; phagocytosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29371567 PMCID: PMC5753153 DOI: 10.3390/jof3040051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Components of the cell wall that help fungi to evade the immune system. The outer layer of mannans of many fungal cells shields the highly immunogenic β-1,3-glucan from Dectin-1 receptor, precluding the activation of effector mechanisms in immune cells. In the case of Histoplasma cells, endo- β-1,3-glucanase is released to trim β-1,3-glucans from the cell and prevents its recognition via Dectin-1 receptor. Melanin is distributed into the cell wall of some fungal pathogens and contributes to resistance to phagocytosis and enzymatic degradation by macrophages. Finally, the reversible, dimorphic switch between yeast and hyphae confers special traits to each form that helps the pathogen to disseminate and invade the host.
Molecules involved in host immune evasion. The table summarizes the different molecules associated to host immune evasion. Their function and effect on the immune system are briefly described.
| Molecules Involved in Host Immune Evasion | Function | Effect on the Human Immune System | Fungi Where They Have Been Described |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proper cell wall architecture | Shielding of β-1,3-glucans from Dectin-1 receptor [ | ||
| Mechanical strength of the cell wall, enzymatic degradation resistance and UV protection [ | Resistance to phagocytosis [ | ||
| Proper cell wall structure and architecture [ | Shielding of β-1,3-glucans from Dectin-1 receptor [ | ||
| Trimming of β-1,3-glucan segments exposed on the fungal cell surface [ | Reduced recognition of the yeast via Dectin-1 and as a consequence, a reduction in stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines [ | ||
| Utilizing host iron-binding proteins as a source of iron [ | Overcoming the host nutritional immunity of iron by the host [ | ||
| Scavenger of host zinc [ | Overcoming the nutritional immunity of zinc by the host [ | ||
| Cell wall hydrophobin | Diminished host NETs formation [ |
Fungal structures involved in the host immune evasion.
| Structures and Architectural Changes Associated in Host Immune Evasion | Function | Effect on the Human Immune System | Fungi Where They Have Been Described |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protection form environment and source of virulence factors [ | Anti-phagocytic properties [ | ||
| Protection from hostile environments [ | Evasion of phagocytosis and resistance to oxidative and nitrosative stresses [ | ||
| Resistance structure that protects the central yeast from the environment | Trapping of IgGs and IgMs, interfering with the proper immune system action [ | ||
| Adhesion on biotic or abiotic surfaces, survival on hostile environments [ | Resistance to neutrophil attack, avoids ROS triggering, and increases resistance to the antifungal activity of PBMNCs |
Figure 2Mechanisms whereby the Cryptococcus neoformans capsule subverts the immune system. Capsule components are released into the extracellular space and directly induce T-cell apoptosis or cell death mediated by antigen presenting cells. Capsule components also decrease human lymphocyte proliferation and induce shedding of l-selectin and TNFα receptor on the surface of neutrophils, blocking their attachment to the endothelial surface and, therefore, migration to infected tissue is reduced. Once C. neoformans is phagocytosed, capsule enlargement occurs and protects the fungal cell from ROS-mediated killing.
Figure 3Different cell populations found in lungs of infected mice with C. neofromans. Yeasts with different capsule sizes, microforms, regular size cells, and titan cells, which are larger than phagocytes, are present during lung infection in mice.
Figure 4Representation of a Sporothrix schenckii asteroid body. Asteroid bodies can measure up to 100 µm, a bigger size when compared to the yeast form, which measures from 2 to 6 µm.