OBJECTIVE: To test whether duplicate imaging relates to a lack of information sharing among providers, we measured the association between emergency department (ED) switching during a kidney stone episode and receipt of a repeat computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: Using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, we identified adults between the ages 18 and 64 with an ED visit for a diagnosis of kidney stones. Among patients who had an abdominal or pelvic CT scan at their initial encounter, we then determined the subset that made an ED revisit within 30 days of their first, distinguishing between those to the same vs a different ED. Finally, we fit multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the risk of receiving a repeat CT scan associated with ED switching. RESULTS: Twelve percent of patients who received a CT scan at their initial ED encounter had a revisit within 30 days of discharge. One-third of their revisits were made to a different ED than the index one. Duplicate CT scans were obtained at nearly 40% of all revisits. On multivariable analysis, the risk of receiving a repeat CT was 12% higher if this revisit was made to a different ED (risk ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21; P = .010). CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that ED switching during an acute kidney stone episode is associated with higher levels of repeat CT imaging. These findings support the role of better health information exchange among providers to help reduce waste in the health-care system.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether duplicate imaging relates to a lack of information sharing among providers, we measured the association between emergency department (ED) switching during a kidney stone episode and receipt of a repeat computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: Using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, we identified adults between the ages 18 and 64 with an ED visit for a diagnosis of kidney stones. Among patients who had an abdominal or pelvic CT scan at their initial encounter, we then determined the subset that made an ED revisit within 30 days of their first, distinguishing between those to the same vs a different ED. Finally, we fit multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the risk of receiving a repeat CT scan associated with ED switching. RESULTS: Twelve percent of patients who received a CT scan at their initial ED encounter had a revisit within 30 days of discharge. One-third of their revisits were made to a different ED than the index one. Duplicate CT scans were obtained at nearly 40% of all revisits. On multivariable analysis, the risk of receiving a repeat CT was 12% higher if this revisit was made to a different ED (risk ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21; P = .010). CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that ED switching during an acute kidney stone episode is associated with higher levels of repeat CT imaging. These findings support the role of better health information exchange among providers to help reduce waste in the health-care system.
Authors: Richard Hillestad; James Bigelow; Anthony Bower; Federico Girosi; Robin Meili; Richard Scoville; Roger Taylor Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Sean P Keehan; Andrea M Sisko; Christopher J Truffer; John A Poisal; Gigi A Cuckler; Andrew J Madison; Joseph M Lizonitz; Sheila D Smith Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: James E Bailey; Rebecca A Pope; Elizabeth C Elliott; Jim Y Wan; Teresa M Waters; Mark E Frisse Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: David B Larson; Lara W Johnson; Beverly M Schnell; Shelia R Salisbury; Howard P Forman Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Choonsik Lee; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael Flynn; Robert T Greenlee; Randell L Kruger; Mark C Hornbrook; Douglas Roblin; Leif I Solberg; Nicholas Vanneman; Sheila Weinmann; Andrew E Williams Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Darin Neven; Leonard Paulozzi; Donelle Howell; Sterling McPherson; Sean M Murphy; Becky Grohs; Linda Marsh; Crystal Lederhos; John Roll Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2016-09-10 Impact factor: 1.484