Literature DB >> 29370451

Predator identity more than predator richness structures aquatic microbial assemblages in Sarracenia purpurea leaves.

Erin J Canter1, Catalina Cuellar-Gempeler2, Abigail I Pastore2, Thomas E Miller2, Olivia U Mason1.   

Abstract

The importance of predators in influencing community structure is a well-studied area of ecology. However, few studies test ecological hypotheses of predation in multi-predator microbial communities. The phytotelmic community found within the water-filled leaves of the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea, exhibits a simple trophic structure that includes multiple protozoan predators and microbial prey. Using this system, we sought to determine whether different predators target distinct microorganisms, how interactions among protozoans affect resource (microorganism) use, and how predator diversity affects prey community diversity. In particular, we endeavored to determine if protozoa followed known ecological patterns such as keystone predation or generalist predation. For these experiments, replicate inquiline microbial communities were maintained for seven days with five protozoan species. Microbial community structure was determined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (iTag) and analysis. Compared to the control (no protozoa), two ciliates followed patterns of keystone predation by increasing microbial evenness. In pairwise competition treatments with a generalist flagellate, prey communities resembled the microbial communities of the respective keystone predator in monoculture. The relative abundance of the most common bacterial Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) in our system decreased compared to the control in the presence of these ciliates. This OTU was 98% similar to a known chitin degrader and nitrate reducer, important functions for the microbial community and the plant host. Collectively, the data demonstrated that predator identity had a greater effect on prey diversity and composition than overall predator diversity.
© 2018 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Sarracenia purpureazzm321990; bacteria; community diversity; iTag sequencing; keystone predation; natural microcosms; pitcher plant; protozoa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29370451     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in the analysis of morphological disparity.

Authors:  Thomas Guillerme; Natalie Cooper; Stephen L Brusatte; Katie E Davis; Andrew L Jackson; Sylvain Gerber; Anjali Goswami; Kevin Healy; Melanie J Hopkins; Marc E H Jones; Graeme T Lloyd; Joseph E O'Reilly; Abi Pate; Mark N Puttick; Emily J Rayfield; Erin E Saupe; Emma Sherratt; Graham J Slater; Vera Weisbecker; Gavin H Thomas; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Selective Bacterial Community Enrichment between the Pitcher Plants Sarracenia minor and Sarracenia flava.

Authors:  Scott M Yourstone; Nikolas M Stasulli; Ilon Weinstein; Elizabeth Ademski; Elizabeth A Shank
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-11-24

3.  Bacterial Recruitment to Carnivorous Pitcher Plant Communities: Identifying Sources Influencing Plant Microbiome Composition and Function.

Authors:  Jacob J Grothjan; Erica B Young
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Protozoa populations are ecosystem engineers that shape prokaryotic community structure and function of the rumen microbial ecosystem.

Authors:  Ronnie Solomon; Tanita Wein; Bar Levy; Shahar Eshed; Rotem Dror; Veronica Reiss; Tamar Zehavi; Ori Furman; Itzhak Mizrahi; Elie Jami
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Diverse microbial communities hosted by the model carnivorous pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea: analysis of both bacterial and eukaryotic composition across distinct host plant populations.

Authors:  Jacob J Grothjan; Erica B Young
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.