Literature DB >> 29369893

Effects of Ambient Temperature and Forced-air Warming on Intraoperative Core Temperature: A Factorial Randomized Trial.

Lijian Pei1, Yuguang Huang, Yiyao Xu, Yongchang Zheng, Xinting Sang, Xiaoyun Zhou, Shanqing Li, Guangmei Mao, Edward J Mascha, Daniel I Sessler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of ambient temperature, with and without active warming, on intraoperative core temperature remains poorly characterized. The authors determined the effect of ambient temperature on core temperature changes with and without forced-air warming.
METHODS: In this unblinded three-by-two factorial trial, 292 adults were randomized to ambient temperatures 19°, 21°, or 23°C, and to passive insulation or forced-air warming. The primary outcome was core temperature change between 1 and 3 h after induction. Linear mixed-effects models assessed the effects of ambient temperature, warming method, and their interaction.
RESULTS: A 1°C increase in ambient temperature attenuated the negative slope of core temperature change 1 to 3 h after anesthesia induction by 0.03 (98.3% CI, 0.01 to 0.06) °Ccore/(h°Cambient) (P < 0.001), for patients who received passive insulation, but not for those warmed with forced-air (-0.01 [98.3% CI, -0.03 to 0.01] °Ccore/[h°Cambient]; P = 0.40). Final core temperature at the end of surgery increased 0.13°C (98.3% CI, 0.07 to 0.20; P < 0.01) per degree increase in ambient temperature with passive insulation, but was unaffected by ambient temperature during forced-air warming (0.02 [98.3% CI, -0.04 to 0.09] °Ccore/°Cambient; P = 0.40). After an average of 3.4 h of surgery, core temperature was 36.3° ± 0.5°C in each of the forced-air groups, and ranged from 35.6° to 36.1°C in passively insulated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Ambient intraoperative temperature has a negligible effect on core temperature when patients are warmed with forced air. The effect is larger when patients are passively insulated, but the magnitude remains small. Ambient temperature can thus be set to comfortable levels for staff in patients who are actively warmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29369893     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence and multivariable factors associated with inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Yinan Li; Hansheng Liang; Yi Feng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Effects of a preoperative forced-air warming system for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yan Xiao; Rui Zhang; Na Lv; Chunmiao Hou; Chunguang Ren; Huiying Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Development and internal validation of an algorithm to predict intraoperative risk of inadvertent hypothermia based on preoperative data.

Authors:  C Wallisch; S Zeiner; P Scholten; C Dibiasi; O Kimberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Risk Stratification for Organ/Space Surgical Site Infection in Advanced Digestive System Cancer.

Authors:  Chen Sun; Hui Gao; Yuelun Zhang; Lijian Pei; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Effect of active forced air warming during the first hour after anesthesia induction and intraoperation avoids hypothermia in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jingyu Wang; Ping Fang; Gangqiang Sun; Ming Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Hypothermia in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Gynecological Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sung-Ae Cho; Seok-Jin Lee; Sieun Yoon; Tae-Yun Sung
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.642

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.