Literature DB >> 29369681

The importance of awareness for understanding language.

Hugh Rabagliati1, Alexander Robertson1, David Carmel1.   

Abstract

Is consciousness required for high level cognitive processes, or can the unconscious mind perform tasks that are as complex and difficult as, for example, understanding a sentence? Recent work has argued that, yes, the unconscious mind can: Sklar et al. (2012) found that sentences, masked from consciousness using the technique of continuous flash suppression (CFS), broke into awareness more rapidly when their meanings were more unusual or more emotionally negative, even though processing the sentences' meaning required unconsciously combining each word's meaning. This has motivated the important claim that consciousness plays little-to-no functional role in high-level cognitive operations. Here, we aimed to replicate and extend these findings, but instead, across 10 high-powered studies, we found no evidence that the meaning of a phrase or word could be understood without awareness. We did, however, consistently find evidence that low-level perceptual features, such as sentence length and familiarity of alphabet, could be processed unconsciously. Our null findings for sentence processing are corroborated by a meta-analysis that aggregates our studies with the prior literature. We offer a potential explanation for prior positive results through a set of computational simulations, which show how the distributional characteristics of this type of CFS data, in particular its skew and heavy tail, can cause an elevated level of false positive results when common data exclusion criteria are applied. Our findings thus have practical implication for analyzing such data. More importantly, they suggest that consciousness may well be required for high-level cognitive tasks such as understanding language. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29369681     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  11 in total

1.  Interaction Between Conscious and Unconscious Information-Processing of Faces and Words.

Authors:  Shiwen Ren; Hanyu Shao; Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  The Influence of Auditory Attention on Rhythmic Speech Tracking: Implications for Studies of Unresponsive Patients.

Authors:  Rodika Sokoliuk; Giulio Degano; Lucia Melloni; Uta Noppeney; Damian Cruse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Gaze direction and face orientation modulate perceptual sensitivity to faces under interocular suppression.

Authors:  Renzo C Lanfranco; Timo Stein; Hugh Rabagliati; David Carmel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Subliminal temporal integration of linguistic information under discontinuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Shao-Min Hung; Po-Jang Hsieh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.

Authors:  Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

6.  Informative neural representations of unseen contents during higher-order processing in human brains and deep artificial networks.

Authors:  Ning Mei; Roberto Santana; David Soto
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-02-03

7.  B or 13? Unconscious Top-Down Contextual Effects at the Categorical but Not the Lexical Level.

Authors:  Dan Biderman; Yarden Shir; Liad Mudrik
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-05-08

8.  Emotion in Chinese Words Could Not Be Extracted in Continuous Flash Suppression.

Authors:  Kaiwen Cheng; Aolin Ding; Lianfang Jiang; Han Tian; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Novel procedure for generating continuous flash suppression: Seurat meets Mondrian.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Gaeun Son; Sang Chul Chong; David A Tovar; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Predictions from masked motion with and without obstacles.

Authors:  Ariel Goldstein; Ido Rivlin; Alon Goldstein; Yoni Pertzov; Ran R Hassin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.