Literature DB >> 29368532

Image-enhanced endoscopy is specific for the diagnosis of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Neil D Parikh1,2, Artur V Viana1,2, Saloni Shah3, Loren Laine1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the performance characteristics of image-enhanced endoscopy with i-Scan or narrow band imaging (NBI) in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) compared to controls without heartburn.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Image-enhanced endoscopic findings of vascularity at the squamocolumnar junction, distal esophageal micro-erosions, and non-round pit pattern at the squamocolumnar junction were assessed in cases (heartburn not responsive to PPIs, positive results on validated GERD questionnaire, no esophageal erosions, esophageal biopsies with histologic evidence of GERD (basal cell hyperplasia, elongation of papillae and dilation of intercellular spaces all required)) and in controls (no GERD symptoms or esophageal erosions).
RESULTS: Twenty cases and 60 controls were compared. The pre-defined features were more common in cases vs. CONTROLS: vascularity RR = 4.9 (95% CI: 2.4-10.0), specificity = 86.7%; micro-erosions RR = 9.7 (3.6-26.5), specificity = 93.3%; non-round pit pattern RR = 2.4 (1.7-3.3), specificity = 60.0%; combination of vascularity and micro-erosions RR = 30.0 (4.1-220), specificity = 98.3%. These differences were consistent with both i-Scan and NBI.
CONCLUSIONS: Image-enhanced endoscopic findings of vascularity and micro-erosions were very specific for non-erosive GERD. Image-enhanced endoscopy may be useful in real-time diagnosis of non-erosive GERD when patients undergo upper endoscopy for heartburn. The relative utility of image-enhanced endoscopy vs. pH-impedance monitoring, based on efficacy, cost and patient acceptance, requires additional study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastroesophageal reflux; endoscopy; gastrointestinal; heartburn; image enhancement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368532      PMCID: PMC6080852          DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1430847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  18 in total

1.  Effect of acid-suppressive therapy on narrow band imaging findings in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study.

Authors:  C R Lynch; S Wani; A Rastogi; J Keighley; S Mathur; A Higbee; A Bansal; S Gaddam; P Sharma
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  Symptom response and healing of erosive esophagitis with proton-pump inhibitors in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Nimish B Vakil; Barry M Traxler; Douglas Levine
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Advanced endoscopic imaging: a review of commercially available technologies.

Authors:  Venkataraman Subramanian; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  High-definition endoscopy with i-Scan and Lugol's solution for more precise detection of mucosal breaks in patients with reflux symptoms.

Authors:  A Hoffman; N Basting; M Goetz; A Tresch; J Mudter; S Biesterfeld; P R Galle; M F Neurath; R Kiesslich
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Investigation of relationships among gastroesophageal reflux disease subtypes using narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy.

Authors:  Jing Lv; Dong Liu; Shi-Yang Ma; Jun Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care.

Authors:  R Jones; O Junghard; J Dent; N Vakil; K Halling; B Wernersson; T Lind
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: esophageal impedance to progress?

Authors:  Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  A feasibility trial of narrow band imaging endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma; Sachin Wani; Ajay Bansal; Sandra Hall; Srinivas Puli; Sharad Mathur; Amit Rastogi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Efficacy of I-scan endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease with minimal change.

Authors:  Min Sik Kim; Seok Reyol Choi; Myung Hwan Roh; Jong Hun Lee; Jin Seok Jang; Byung Geun Kim; Sang Ock Kim; Ji Sun Han; Chien Ter Hsing
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2011-09-30

10.  i-Scan detection of minimal change esophagitis in dyspeptic patients with or without Gastroesophageal Reflux disease.

Authors:  Nisa Netinatsunton; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Siriboon Attasaranya; Teepawit Witeerungrot; Naichaya Chamroonkul; Theeratus Jongboonyanuparp; Alan Geater; Bancha Ovartlarnporn
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Is Noncardiac Chest Pain Truly Noncardiac?

Authors:  Hiroki Teragawa; Chikage Oshita; Yuichi Orita
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-15

2.  A Deep Learning Model for Classification of Endoscopic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Chi-Chih Wang; Yu-Ching Chiu; Wei-Liang Chen; Tzu-Wei Yang; Ming-Chang Tsai; Ming-Hseng Tseng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.