Literature DB >> 29368440

Sexualized drug use ('chemsex') and high-risk sexual behaviours in HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

E L Pufall1, M Kall2, M Shahmanesh3, A Nardone2, R Gilson3, V Delpech2, H Ward1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV infection remains high in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in the UK, and sexualized drug use ("chemsex") and injecting drug use ("slamsex") may play a part in this. We aimed to characterize HIV-positive MSM engaging in chemsex/slamsex and to assess the associations with self-reported STI diagnoses and sexual behaviours.
METHODS: Data from a 2014 survey of people attending HIV clinics in England and Wales were linked to clinical data from national HIV surveillance records and weighted to be nationally representative. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the associations of chemsex and slamsex with self-reported unprotected anal intercourse (UAI), serodiscordant UAI (sdUAI) (i.e. UAI with an HIV-negative or unknown HIV status partner), sdUAI with a detectable viral load (>50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL), hepatitis C, and bacterial STIs.
RESULTS: In the previous year, 29.5% of 392 sexually active participants engaged in chemsex, and 10.1% in slamsex. Chemsex was significantly associated with increased odds of UAI [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 5.73; P < 0.001], sdUAI (AOR 2.34; P < 0.05), sdUAI with a detectable viral load (AOR 3.86; P < 0.01), hepatitis C (AOR 6.58; P < 0.01), and bacterial STI diagnosis (AOR 2.65; P < 0.01). Slamsex was associated with increased odds of UAI (AOR 6.11; P < 0.05), hepatitis C (AOR 9.39; P < 0.001), and bacterial STI diagnosis (AOR 6.11; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Three in ten sexually active HIV-positive MSM engaged in chemsex in the past year, which was positively associated with self-reported depression/anxiety, smoking, nonsexual drug use, risky sexual behaviours, STIs, and hepatitis C. Chemsex may therefore play a role in the ongoing HIV and STI epidemics in the UK.
© 2018 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV transmission; hepatitis C; men who have sex with men; recreational drugs; sexually transmitted infections

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368440      PMCID: PMC5900961          DOI: 10.1111/hiv.12574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HIV Med        ISSN: 1464-2662            Impact factor:   3.180


Introduction

In 2015, there were over 435 000 new diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in England, and gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) were one of the most heavily impacted groups 1. From 2012 to 2015, STI diagnoses in MSM rose sharply, with gonorrhoea increasing by 105%, syphilis by 95%, and chlamydia by 52% 1. Sexually transmitted enteric infections in MSM have also increased, with diagnoses of non‐travel‐associated Shigella flexneri 2a among men increasing by 30% from 2014 to 2015, while diagnoses in women remained stable 2. Furthermore, new HIV diagnoses in MSM rose to 3360 in 2014 3, and modelling studies suggest that HIV incidence among MSM is increasing in the UK 4. Sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is also ongoing in HIV‐positive MSM 5. Several factors are likely to have contributed to the rise in infections in MSM, one of which may be sexualized drug use. Sexualised drug use, often called ‘chemsex’ or ‘party and play’, is the practice of intentionally using drugs before or during sex to increase both sexual pleasure and arousal, and is practised mainly by gay, bisexual and other MSM 6, 7, 8. In the UK, the most common chemsex drugs are crystal methamphetamine, gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid/gamma‐butyrolactone (GHB/GBL), and mephedrone (MCAT), with ketamine also used to facilitate sex 7. As a consequence of the prolonged nature of chemsex sessions, which often involve mucosally traumatic and condomless sex, there is an increased risk of transmission of HIV, HCV and other STIs 9, 10, 11, 12. Chemsex drugs can also be injected, in a behaviour called ‘slamming’, or ‘slamsex’, although this practice is rare with GHB/GBL. Slamsex brings with it additional risks of HIV and HCV infection if needles or other injecting equipment is shared. Previous work in the UK has shown that, among HIV‐positive MSM, recreational drug use, regardless of the sexual context, is associated with condomless sex, including with partners of unknown or HIV‐negative status, creating the possibility for HIV transmission 13, 14. Drug use has also been linked to outbreaks of Shigella flexneri 3a among MSM in London 15 and an increased incidence of bacterial STIs and hepatitis C 12, 16, 17, 18. Reports from urban centres such as London and Bristol suggest that chemsex is increasing in popularity 6, 8, 19, 20, is more common among HIV‐positive than HIV‐negative MSM 7, 8, 13, 16, and may be linked to HIV transmission 9, 13, 21, 22, 23. Despite these concerns, quantitative data on chemsex and its associated risks are sparse 8, 13. Indeed, a recent editorial in the British Medical Journal called for chemsex to become a national public health priority in view of the risk of HIV and STI transmission, while highlighting the fact that a lack of quantitative data on chemsex and slamsex is limiting the efforts of clinicians and policy makers 24. To address this gap, we aimed to quantify the national prevalence of chemsex and slamsex among HIV‐positive MSM in the UK, characterize the populations involved, and explore associations with sexual risk behaviours, hepatitis C, and bacterial STI diagnoses.

Methods

Study design and data collection

Positive Voices is a cross‐sectional survey of people living with HIV in the UK. Full details of the study and recruitment methods have been presented previously 25. Briefly, adults (aged ≥18 years) attending one of 30 National Health Service (NHS) HIV clinics in England and Wales were selected to participate, using the national cohort of persons diagnosed with HIV infection receiving care held at Public Health England (PHE) as a national sampling frame. Data were collected anonymously using a web‐based computer‐assisted self‐interview from May to November 2014.

Data processing

Using an anonymous individual identifier, survey responses were linked to clinical and demographic records in the national cohort of persons in HIV care 26. Linking the two databases allowed us to incorporate clinical data on participant viral loads at clinic visits in the last year into our study. Of the 392 sexually active MSM, clinical data on viral loads were available for 361 (92.1%). Survey data were weighted by standardization based on the age and risk group distributions in the 2014 clinical data set of the national cohort of persons in HIV care 26. In this way, the data presented here were made to be representative of the entire population of people with HIV infection accessing care in the UK. Sampling weights were subsequently applied to account for the unequal sampling probability at different participating clinics.

Assessment of drug use for sexual pleasure

Participants were asked to report on the use of crystal methamphetamine, GHB/GBL, ketamine, and mephedrone before or during sexual encounters in the past year. The slang/street names for all drugs were included in the questionnaire. Chemsex was defined as the use of one or more of these drugs in a sexual context using any route. Participants who specifically reported injecting any of the chemsex drugs for sexual purposes were classified as having engaged in slamsex and were considered as a subset of chemsex users. Comparators were sexually active MSM who did not engage in the behaviour.

Sexual behaviours and STIs

Self‐reported data were collected on condom use, number of sexual partners, partner type (regular or casual), and HIV status of sexual partners over the previous year. Unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) was defined as anal sex without a condom with any partner in the previous year. Serodiscordant UAI (sdUAI) was defined as having UAI with a partner of unknown or HIV‐negative status. Participants were deemed to have engaged in sdUAI with a detectable viral load if in the previous year they had had sdUAI and had at least one viral load recorded >50 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL. The categories of sexual behaviour were not mutually exclusive and comparators were sexually active MSM who did not engage in the behaviour. We defined participants as having been diagnosed with an STI in the previous year if they reported a new diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhoea or syphilis in the previous year. If a person was diagnosed with two or more STIs in the previous year then he was classed as having had multiple STIs. Participants also reported whether they had ever been diagnosed with hepatitis C.

Assessment of other variables

Information on age, country of birth, educational attainment, employment status, housing status, religion, relationship status, diagnosed depression/anxiety, smoking status, frequency of binge drinking (consuming six or more units of alcohol if female and eight or more if male in one session), illicit drug use, antiretroviral therapy (ART) status, and year of HIV diagnosis was self‐reported in the survey. Categorical variables were created: age was categorized as 18–34, 35–44, 45–54, and ≥55 years; region of birth (UK, rest of Europe, Africa and other) was created based on country of birth; nonsexual recreational drug use was assessed by asking participants to indicate from a list which recreational drugs they had taken in the last year, coding participants who indicated having taken one or more of the drugs as drug users, but excluding participants who reported only taking drugs before or during sex; time since HIV diagnosis was calculated as the difference between self‐reported year of diagnosis and the year of survey completion (2014 for all participants), and categorized as <2 years since diagnosis, 2–5 years since diagnosis, 6–10 years since diagnosis, and ≥11 years since diagnosis.

Statistical analyses

All analyses and data cleaning were conducted in stata/mp 14.1 (StataCorp MP College Station, Texas, USA) and missing data were assumed to be missing at random. The weighted prevalence of chemsex and slamsex in sexually active MSM was calculated overall, and for each chemsex drug, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We tested if chemsex and slamsex use differed by various socio‐demographic factors and health indicators using a two‐tailed χ 2 statistic, and considered differences to be statistically significant at P < 0.05. We assessed the associations of chemsex and slamsex with UAI, sdUAI, sdUAI with a detectable viral load, and diagnosis with bacterial STIs and hepatitis C using multivariable logistic regression. The associations between chemsex/slamsex and number of casual sexual partners were assessed using multivariable linear regression. All multivariable models were constructed using directed acyclic graphs (Figure S1) to determine which variables to control for 27, 28, 29, 30, 31. All regressions were assessed for statistical significance with an alpha level of 5%.

Study population

A total of 4350 invitations were issued to participating clinics, representing approximately 20% of the adult HIV‐infected population of each clinic. Of these, 3045 (70%) were handed out and 777 responses were received (response rate of 25.6% from all those invited to participate and 39.0% among MSM). Of the 777 respondents, 532 were classed as MSM based on self‐identifying their gender as male and reporting either having had sex with a man in the last year or that their sexual orientation was gay or bisexual. After exclusion of participants who were not sexually active in the last year (i.e. those who did not report having had sex with a man in the last year), the study population consisted of 392 sexually active MSM. The total weighted population of sexually active HIV‐positive MSM in the study was 24 956.

Ethics

Positive Voices was funded by the National Institute for Health Research and was reviewed by the London Harrow NHS Research Ethics Committee (Project ID 13/LO/0279). The funder had no role in the design, analysis or interpretation of the study.

Results

Of the 392 MSM who were sexually active in the past year, 102 (29.5%) reported engaging in chemsex and 34 (10.1%) in slamsex (Figure 1). Among chemsex users, the most commonly used drugs were GHB/GBL (71.6%; 68 of 102) and mephedrone (71.4%; 76 of 102). The most commonly used drugs for slamsex were crystal methamphetamine (69.2%; 24 of 34) and mephedrone (64.2%; 22 of 34). Among all MSM, 54.2% (275 of 532) had used drugs in the last year and 42.5% (201 of 532) had used drugs in the last 4 weeks. Detailed drug use for all MSM is presented in Figure S2.
Figure 1

Proportion of sexually active MSM who reported engaging in chemsex and slamsex over the past three months by drug type. GHB/GBL, gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid/gamma‐butyrolactone.

Proportion of sexually active MSM who reported engaging in chemsex and slamsex over the past three months by drug type. GHB/GBL, gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid/gamma‐butyrolactone. Chemsex was more common among participants aged 18–44 years, those living in London, those diagnosed with depression or anxiety at some point in their lives, current cigarette smokers, and those who reported nonsexual recreational drug use (Table 1). There were no differences by region of birth, education level, employment status, relationship status, binge drinking frequency, ART status, or time since HIV diagnosis. Slamsex was more common among participants who lived in London and were on ART, but no other differences were found (Table 2).
Table 1

Profile of sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection who engaged in chemsex in the UK, showing if chemsex use varied by socio‐demographic characteristics

DenominatorAny chemsexCrystal methMephedroneGHBKetamine
UnweightedWeighted n (%) P n (%) P n (%) P n (%) P n (%) P
Age group
18–34 years63630214 (22.1)0.027 (10.9)0.05514 (22.1)0.1312 (18.4)0.147 (9.4)0.44
35–44 years97688328 (34.3)12 (15.6)20 (26.0)17 (23.0)9 (10.6)
45–54 years146865445 (35.1)25 (21.0)31 (25.8)30 (24.1)20 (14.9)
≥55 years86311715 (18.6)10 (11.9)10 (12.8)8 (9.0)5 (7.1)
Region of birth
UK2941687571 (28.4)0.1142 (17.7)0.2750 (21.2)0.1346 (19.6)0.3332 (13.0)0.43
Europe54414318 (37.1)4 (8.9)13 (27.8)12 (24.4)6 (10.6)
Africa* 88501 (NA)0 (NA)1 (NA)1 (NA) 0 (NA)
Other36308912 (32.7)8 (18.9)11 (31.4)8 (24.3)3 (6.4)
Education
Up to qualification at 16 years86459317 (26.7)0.839 (13.4)0.4110 (17.1)0.097 (10.7)0.068 (12.7)0.49
Qualification at 18 years74494720 (32.2)11 (18.8)17 (28.8)15 (25.4)8 (10.6)
Undergraduate118804833 (29.7)18 (16.6)27 (26.6)25 (23.6)15 (13.3)
Postgraduate95647726 (28.3)12 (12.8)16 (17.6)16 (19.0)7 (7.8)
Other* 126014 (NA)2 (NA)4 (NA) 2 (NA) 2 (NA)
Employment
Employed2721806075 (30.0)0.1541 (15.9)0.3054 (23.1)0.0750 (21.0)0.1432 (12.6)0.47
Unemployed2317508 (39.1)5 (23.3)7 (37.4)7 (33.7)1 (4.5)
Othera 95490918 (23.8)7 (11.7)14 (18.5)9 (12.9)8 (9.6)
Living in London
No2161174226 (17.7)<0.00116 (7.4)<0.00124 (12.8)<0.00122 (11.4)0.00318 (9.0)0.21
Yes1761321566 (40.0)38 (23.3)51 (32.0)45 (28.6)23 (13.4)
Main partner
No138905036 (29.8)0.8422 (18.6)0.0927 (23.9)0.8128 (23.2)0.299 (7.5)0.15
Yes2461580462 (29.0)28 (13.3)47 (22.9)47 (19.0)31 (13.7)
Diagnosed anxiety or depression
No2561632160 (24.6)0.0230 (11.5)0.00542 (18.1)0.0139 (16.2)0.0324 (9.8)0.06
Yes136863542 (38.8)24 (24.0)33 (32.2)28 (28.6)17 (14.2)
Current smoker
No2661639958 (24.2)<0.00129 (12.3)0.00340 (17.7)<0.00137 (16.5)0.00520 (8.1)0.07
Yes123852142 (38.8)24 (22.1)33 (31.8)29 (28.8)20 (17.0)
Binge drinking
Less than weekly3192089283 (29.4)0.8144 (16.0)0.9259 (22.1)0.4054 (20.4)0.5438 (13.0)0.047
Weekly or more58386217 (31.5)9 (16.7)15 (29.1)13 (25.6)3 (4.9)
Nonsexual drug use
No1861173320 (13.0)<0.0018 (5.5)<0.00113 (8.8)<0.00112 (7.3)<0.0016 (3.7)<0.001
Yes2061322382 (44.2)46 (24.9)62 (35.5)55 (32.2)35 (18.1)
ART status
Not on ART36288511 (35.6)0.427 (20.1)0.6311 (35.6)0.079 (26.5)0.455 (13.4)0.76
On ART3552206191 (28.8)47 (15.3)64 (21.3)58 (19.7)36 (11.1)
Time since diagnosis
<2 years28199210 (45.3)0.135 (22.8)0.378 (41.1)0.068 (32.3)0.232 (9.2)0.81
2–5 years103699024 (24.1)13 (11.9)20 (21.6)20 (21.0)11 (11.5)
6–10 years114805837 (33.8)19 (18.9)25 (23.4)21 (21.6)16 (13.2)
≥11 years147791731 (26.1)17 (14.3)22 (19.2)18 (15.8)12 (9.8)

ART, antiretroviral therapy; GHB, gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid; NA, not applicable.

Percentages represent percentages of participants in that group who engaged in chemsex and are weighted values.

Percentages omitted because of a small denominator.

Student, carer, retired or disabled.

Table 2

Profile of sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection who engaged in slamsex in the UKa, showing if slamsex use varied by socio‐demographic characteristics

DenominatorAny slamsex Crystal methMephedrone
UnweightedWeighted n (%) P n (%) P n (%) P
Age group
18–34 years6363026 (9.6)0.192 (2.5)0.095 (8.3)0.08
35–44 years9768837 (8.9)5 (7.0)5 (3.6)
45–54 years146865417 (13.6)12 (10.3)12 (9.5)
≥55 years8631174 (4.5)4 (4.5)4 (19.1)
Region of birth
UK2941687525 (10.8)0.6519 (8.5)0.3016 (6.6)0.77
Europe5441436 (11.4)2 (3.2)3 (7.3)
Africab 88500 (NA)0 (NA)0 (NA)
Other3630893 (7.7)2 (3.4)2 (7.7)
Education
Up to qualification at 16 years864593 4 (6.1)0.452 (3.2)0.423 (4.4)0.60
Qualification at 18 years7449476 (11.3)3 (5.3)4 (8.7)
Undergraduate118804813 (12.2)10 (8.8)8 (7.6)
Postgraduate9564778 (8.7)6 (6.7)5 (4.7)
Otherb 126012 (NA)1 (NA)1 (NA)
Employment
Employed2721806025 (10.3)0.3817 (6.8)0.2916 (6.5)0.95
Unemployed2317504 (17.2)3 (12.7)2 (7.8)
Otherc 9549095 (7.4)3 (4.0)4 (6.8)
Living in London
No2161174212 (6.0)0.047 (3.3)0.019 (4.5)0.12
Yes1761321522 (13.8)16 (9.7)13 (8.5)
Main partner
No138905011 (9.2)0.539 (7.1)0.449 (7.5)0.61
Yes2461580422 (10.3)13 (6.1)13 (6.3)
Diagnosed anxiety or depression
No2561632119 (8.4)0.3111 (4.6)0.0413 (5.5)0.48
Yes136863515 (13.4)12 (10.5)9 (8.6)
Current smoker
No2661639919 (8.4)0.1513 (5.4)0.3210 (4.5)0.03
Yes123852114 (12.8)9 (8.4)11 (10.0)
Binge drinking
Less than weekly3192089228 (9.9)0.9418 (6.4)0.5319 (6.7)0.22
Weekly or more5838625 (9.5)5 (9.5)2 (3.5)
Nonsexual drug use
No1861173310 (6.9)0.245 (3.3)0.026 (4.5)0.21
Yes2061322324 (13.3)18 (9.7)16 (8.4)
ART status
Not on ART3628856 (20.2)0.023 (7.5)0.805 (17.4)0.002
On ART3552206128 (8.8)20 (6.6)17 (5.2)
Time since diagnosis
<2 years2819923 (15.9)0.591 (1.5)0.413 (15.9)0.10
2–5 years103699010 (10.2)6 (6.4)6 (6.0)
6–10 years114805811 (10.2)9 (8.6)5 (4.5)
≥11 years147791710 (8.6)7 (6.3)8 (6.9)

ART, antiretroviral therapy; NA, not applicable.

Percentages represent percentages of participants in that group who engaged in slamsex and are weighted values.

Data on gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and ketamine are not presented as only two and four people, respectively, reported slamsex with them.

Percentages omitted because of a small denominator.

Student, carer, retired or disabled.

Profile of sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection who engaged in chemsex in the UK, showing if chemsex use varied by socio‐demographic characteristics ART, antiretroviral therapy; GHB, gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid; NA, not applicable. Percentages represent percentages of participants in that group who engaged in chemsex and are weighted values. Percentages omitted because of a small denominator. Student, carer, retired or disabled. Profile of sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection who engaged in slamsex in the UKa, showing if slamsex use varied by socio‐demographic characteristics ART, antiretroviral therapy; NA, not applicable. Percentages represent percentages of participants in that group who engaged in slamsex and are weighted values. Data on gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and ketamine are not presented as only two and four people, respectively, reported slamsex with them. Percentages omitted because of a small denominator. Student, carer, retired or disabled. Three‐quarters of participants reported UAI (72.3%; 278 of 386), with two‐thirds reporting sdUAI (35.0%; 132 of 371), and one in ten reporting sdUAI with a detectable viral load (9.8%; 30 of 330). The odds of engaging in each of these behaviours was significantly higher among participants engaging in chemsex. However, for slamsex, only UAI was statistically significant (Table 3). Although a low proportion of participants engaged in sex with the highest risk of HIV transmission (i.e. sdUAI with a detectable viral load), the odds of having had this type of sex in the last year were more than three times greater if a participant engaged in chemsex than if they did not. Participants who engaged in chemsex also reported a significantly higher average number of casual partners than those who did not [31.4 versus 8.1, respectively; adjusted (mean) difference +16.4; 95% CI 12.4–20.5]; this was also the case for those who engaged in slamsex [26.4 versus 13.6, respectively; adjusted (mean) difference +12.2; 95% CI 0.73–23.7].
Table 3

Relationship between chemsex and slamsex and sexual behaviours with a risk of onward HIV transmission

UAIsdUAIsdUAI with detectable viral load
DenominatorPer cent reporting UAI (95% CI)OR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)DenominatorPer cent reporting (95% CI)OR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI) DenominatorPer cent reporting (95% CI) OR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)
UnweightedWeightedUnweightedWeightedUnweightedWeighted
Chemsex
No2841745664 (59–69)112771752529 (25–34)11248172965.9 (3.2–11)11
Yes102682792 (85–96)6.44 (3.2–13)*** 5.73 (3.2–10.4)*** 94711648 (35–62)2.24 (1.3–3.8)** 2.34 (1.1–4.8)* 82684120 (14–26)3.91 (1.9–8.1)**3.86 (1.8–8.1)**
Slamsex
No3522233670 (65–75)113392219734 (29–40)11305220218.5 (5.5–13)11
Yes34254596 (86–99)6.90 (2.5–41)**6.11 (1.2–30.6)* 32244442 (27–59)1.43 (0.75–2.7)1.49 (0.58–3.9)25211523 (10–45)3.28 (1.02–11)* 1.91 (0.46–8.0)

AOR, adjusted odds ratio; OR, odds ratio; UAI, unprotected anal intercourse; sdUAI, serodiscordant UAI.

All percentages are weighted values. Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Relationship between chemsex and slamsex and sexual behaviours with a risk of onward HIV transmission AOR, adjusted odds ratio; OR, odds ratio; UAI, unprotected anal intercourse; sdUAI, serodiscordant UAI. All percentages are weighted values. Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals (CIs). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Over 40% (40.5%; 111 of 293) reported being diagnosed with a bacterial STI in the last year, the odds of which were significantly higher for participants who engaged in chemsex and slamsex than for those who did not (Table 4). Slamsex users were also more likely to have been diagnosed with multiple STIs in the previous year, although this association was not seen among participants who engaged in chemsex only (Table 4). In addition to bacterial STIs, participants who engaged in chemsex and slamsex also had significantly greater odds, compared with those who did not, of ever having been diagnosed with hepatitis C [chemsex: 21.9% versus 3.57%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 6.58; 95% CI 2.24–19.3; slamsex: 36.0% versus 5.96%, respectively; AOR 9.39; 95% CI 3.01–29.3], which was reported by 9.0% (38 of 392) of participants overall.
Table 4

Relationship between chemsex and slamsex and self‐reported bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnoses in the previous year

DenominatorAny STIMultiple STIsChlamydiaGonorrhoeaSyphilis
UnweightedWeightedPer cent reporting any STIOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)Per cent reporting >1 STIOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)Per cent reporting chlamydiaOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)Per cent reporting gonorrhoeaOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)Per cent reporting syphilisOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)
Chemsex
No2041565431% (25–38)1114% (10–21)1119% (14–26)1115% (11–21)1118% (13–24)11
Yes89768060% (50–69)3.38 (2.0–5.8)*** 2.65 (1.5–4.6)** 34% (27–41)3.03 (1.8–5.2)*** 2.01 (1.0–4.1)37% (30–44)2.44 (1.5–4.0)** 1.98 (1.1–3.8)* 45% (38–53)4.48 (2.9–6.8)*** 3.11 (1.8–5.4)*** 16% (10–25)0.87 (0.49–1.6)0.64 (0.36–1.1)
Slamsex 
No2622061235% (28–43)1117% (12–23)1122% (17–28)1122% (15–30)1115% (12–20)11
Yes31272279% (68–87)6.82 (3.3–14)*** 6.11 (2.7–13.6)*** 51% (40–61)5.08 (3.1–8.4)*** 4.00 (1.9–8.4)** 49% (35–63)3.48 (1.7–7.0)** 3.09 (1.4–6.4)** 54% (40–68)4.42 (1.8–11)** 3.40 (1.2–9.6)* 31% (15–54)2.54 (1.1–6.2)* 2.85 (1.5–5.4)*

AOR, adjusted odds ratio; OR, odds ratio.

All percentages are weighted values. Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Relationship between chemsex and slamsex and self‐reported bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnoses in the previous year AOR, adjusted odds ratio; OR, odds ratio. All percentages are weighted values. Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals (CIs). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

Approximately one in three sexually active MSM reported sexualized drug use (chemsex) in the past year and this was strongly associated with self‐reported STIs (including gonorrhoea and chlamydia) and hepatitis C. It was also associated with sexual behaviours that pose a risk of onward HIV transmission, including high numbers of sexual partners, and condomless sex with partners of unknown or HIV‐negative status while having a detectable viral load. Furthermore, this study showed a clustering of risk factors for poor health in MSM living in London, with chemsex being more common in MSM who were diagnosed with depression/anxiety, who smoked, and who took other recreational drugs. This clustering of risk around chemsex, affecting a young and vulnerable group, suggests a syndemic of sexual ill health, drug use harms, and mental illness among HIV‐positive MSM. This was the first study of chemsex among HIV‐positive MSM to use a national probability sample and, through weighting, has produced national estimates that reflect the whole population of HIV‐positive MSM accessing care in the UK. Although the overall sample size was small and response rates relatively low, respondents were broadly representative of MSM in the target population 25, and thus we felt it appropriate to weight the data and generalize the findings to the wider population of HIV‐positive MSM accessing care. Data were collected from people linked to NHS HIV care and therefore we cannot extrapolate our findings beyond this group, meaning that they may not be representative of the entire UK MSM population living with HIV. People not linked to HIV care, or who are unaware of their HIV status, may be more likely to engage in risky sexual practices and be more likely to transmit HIV, possibly making the estimates herein conservative for the overall population 32, 33. There was also the possibility that our estimates of chemsex and STIs were conservative as a consequence of social desirability bias leading to underreporting of such behaviours. To minimize this problem, data were collected using a web‐based self‐interview, which has been found to increase disclosure of sensitive and stigmatized behaviour 34, 35. Importantly, the data on viral load were not self‐reported, avoiding reporting bias for this parameter. As with all cross‐sectional studies, our findings represent associations only and we cannot be certain that chemsex occurred at the same time as sex with a high risk of HIV transmission, or make causal inferences, such as stating that chemsex causes people to engage in riskier sex. Indeed, the 1‐year reference period for the measures is a limitation of the study, with relationships between chemsex and specific sexual practices better analysed using sexual encounter‐level data. Despite this, previous reports from the UK have indicated that chemsex is often associated with more sexual partners, higher HIV risk sex, and not taking antiretroviral drugs, meaning that there is an increased likelihood that participants would have had a detectable viral load during their chemsex sessions 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 36, 37. Irrespective of causality or the sequence of events, our findings show that taking drugs before or during sex is linked to a higher number of sexual partners, higher levels of high‐risk sexual behaviours, and increased STI diagnoses, which is in line with previous findings in the UK 13, 16. Additionally, we have highlighted that HIV‐positive MSM engaged in chemsex are more likely to have mental health issues and other addictive behaviours, and that these risks and morbidities are occurring in the same individuals. Attention must therefore be paid not only to the association between chemsex, STIs, the hepatitis C epidemic, and behaviours that are driving the HIV epidemic, but also to its impact on the overall health of HIV‐positive MSM. Given this potentially devastating syndemic, the fact that chemsex appears to be on the increase 6, 8, 19, 20, chemsex being linked to increases in HIV incidence in MSM 9, 13, 21, 22 and increases in STI diagnoses in MSM 15, 16, and that it can cause severe side effects and even death 36, 38, 39, it is becoming ever more important to address chemsex as a public health priority. To address chemsex and the syndemic surrounding it, there is a need for a joined‐up response between HIV treatment, mental health, addiction, and sexual health services. Traditional drug dependence services, which focus on opiate use, have had poor uptake by MSM 40, probably because their current configuration is not suited to addressing the needs of MSM and the sexual nature of their drug use 9. There is evidence that MSM who engage in chemsex prefer to receive drug counselling services based in sexual health clinics, which traditionally have high attendance levels from MSM in the UK 7. Indeed, some sexual health clinics in London are offering focussed chemsex programmes with trained staff and chemsex care plans for patients 7, 41, 42. Although these programmes have found high levels of acceptability and uptake among MSM engaging in chemsex 19, 36, they remain in their infancy and their effectiveness has not yet been fully evaluated 7, 43. Future research should therefore focus on ways of addressing the syndemic of ill health, drug use harms, and mental illness among HIV‐positive MSM. Such research should take a broad public health approach that includes examining the possible social and cultural determinants. The need for holistic approaches to health among MSM has been emphasized in Public Health England's MSM strategic action plan and its commissioner's toolkit for chemsex, which highlight the interactions between health, substance use, and sexual risk behaviours 44, 45. Therefore, service evaluations and the development and testing of a set of best‐practice guidelines for helping health care staff, including general practitioners 38, to manage patients should be prioritized. Developing a robust evidence base around the wider issues surrounding chemsex and how to best help men who are engaged in chemsex to remain safe must be priorities going forward.

Author contributions

EP wrote the statistical analysis plan, cleaned and analysed the data, and drafted and revised the paper; MK designed data collection tools, monitored data collection for the whole trial, and drafted and revised the paper; MS, AN and RG designed data collection tools, monitored data collection for the whole trial, and revised the draft paper; VD designed data collection tools, monitored data collection for the whole trial, and drafted and revised the draft paper; HW wrote the statistical analysis plan and drafted and revised the paper. Fig. S1. Causal diagram used to inform multivariable regression models. Click here for additional data file. Fig. S2. Recreational drug use among all MSM. Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

1.  Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference.

Authors:  J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  "Chemsex" and harm reduction need among gay men in South London.

Authors:  Adam Bourne; David Reid; Ford Hickson; Sergio Torres-Rueda; Paul Steinberg; Peter Weatherburn
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2015-07-26

3.  Sexualised drug use in people attending sexual health clinics in England.

Authors:  Hamish Mohammed; John Were; Carina King; Martina Furegato; Anthony Nardone; Gwenda Hughes
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Motivations and values associated with combining sex and illicit drugs ('chemsex') among gay men in South London: findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  P Weatherburn; F Hickson; D Reid; S Torres-Rueda; A Bourne
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Recreational drug use, polydrug use, and sexual behaviour in HIV-diagnosed men who have sex with men in the UK: results from the cross-sectional ASTRA study.

Authors:  Marina Daskalopoulou; Alison Rodger; Andrew N Phillips; Lorraine Sherr; Andrew Speakman; Simon Collins; Jonathan Elford; Margaret A Johnson; Richard Gilson; Martin Fisher; Ed Wilkins; Jane Anderson; Jeffrey McDonnell; Simon Edwards; Nicky Perry; Rebecca O'Connell; Monica Lascar; Martin Jones; Anne M Johnson; Graham Hart; Alec Miners; Anna-Maria Geretti; William J Burman; Fiona C Lampe
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 12.767

6.  Chemsex and the city: sexualised substance use in gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics.

Authors:  A Hegazi; M J Lee; W Whittaker; S Green; R Simms; R Cutts; M Nagington; B Nathan; M R Pakianathan
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 1.359

7.  Illicit drug use in sexual settings ('chemsex') and HIV/STI transmission risk behaviour among gay men in South London: findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Bourne; D Reid; F Hickson; S Torres-Rueda; P Weatherburn
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 8.  Incidence of sexually transmitted hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Holly Hagan; Ashly E Jordan; Joshua Neurer; Charles M Cleland
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 9.  Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration.

Authors:  Phil Edwards
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Increased HIV incidence in men who have sex with men despite high levels of ART-induced viral suppression: analysis of an extensively documented epidemic.

Authors:  Andrew N Phillips; Valentina Cambiano; Fumiyo Nakagawa; Alison E Brown; Fiona Lampe; Alison Rodger; Alec Miners; Jonathan Elford; Graham Hart; Anne M Johnson; Jens Lundgren; Valerie C Delpech
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Understanding and addressing hepatitis C reinfection in the oral direct-acting antiviral era.

Authors:  O Falade-Nwulia; M S Sulkowski; A Merkow; C Latkin; S H Mehta
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.728

Review 2.  Self-Control as Conceptual Framework to Understand and Support People Who Use Drugs During Sex.

Authors:  Tom Platteau; Eric Florence; John B F de Wit
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Increase in recreational drug use between 2008 and 2018: results from a prospective cohort study among HIV-negative men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Liza Coyer; Anders Boyd; Udi Davidovich; Ward P H van Bilsen; Maria Prins; Amy Matser
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 7.256

4.  Association of Sexualized Drug Use Patterns with HIV/STI Transmission Risk in an Internet Sample of Men Who Have Sex with Men from Seven European Countries.

Authors:  Juan-Miguel Guerras; Juan Hoyos Miller; Cristina Agustí; Sophocles Chanos; François Pichon; Matthias Kuske; Bojan Cigan; Ricardo Fuertes; Roxana Stefanescu; Lieselot Ooms; Jordi Casabona; Luis de la Fuente; María-José Belza
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-09-02

5.  Sexually transmitted infections in persons living with HIV infection and estimated HIV transmission risk: trends over time from the DC Cohort.

Authors:  Alessandra Anna Secco; Hana Akselrod; Jonathan Czeresnia; Matthew Levy; Morgan Byrne; Anne Monroe; Jose Lucar; Michael Horberg; Amanda Derryck Castel; Rupali Doshi; Heather Rivasplata; Leah Squires; David Parenti; Debra Benator
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Psychological and Interpersonal Factors Associated with Sexualized Drug Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Lafortune; Martin Blais; Geneviève Miller; Laurence Dion; Frédérick Lalonde; Luc Dargis
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-27

7.  HIV Prevention Trials Network 078: High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Antibodies Among Urban US Men Who Have Sex With Men, Independent of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Status.

Authors:  Risha Irvin; Theresa Gamble; Jowanna Malone; Zhe Wang; Ethan Wilson; James P Hughes; Jason Farley; Kenneth H Mayer; Carlos Del Rio; D Scott Batey; Vanessa Cummings; Robert H Remien; Chris Beyrer; Chloe L Thio
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 20.999

8.  The Moderating Role of Social Support on the Relationship Between Anxiety, Stigma, and Intention to Use Illicit Drugs Among HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Phoenix K H Mo; Xi Chen; Eliz H K Lam; Jinghua Li; Christopher W Kahler; Joseph T F Lau
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-01

Review 9.  Identifying and managing infectious disease syndemics in patients with HIV.

Authors:  Daniel J Bromberg; Kenneth H Mayer; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.061

10.  A qualitative study exploring the social and environmental context of recently acquired HIV infection among men who have sex with men in South-East England.

Authors:  Annabelle Gourlay; Julie Fox; Mitzy Gafos; Sarah Fidler; Nneka Nwokolo; Amanda Clarke; Richard Gilson; Chloe Orkin; Simon Collins; Kholoud Porter; Graham Hart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.