Literature DB >> 29368316

Comparison of Sinonasal Complications of Microscopic and Endoscopic Approaches for Transsphenoidal Hypophyseal Surgery: Prospective Study.

Murat Kiraz1, Omur Gunaldi, Osman Tanriverdi, Ibrahim Erdim, Lutfi Sinasi Postalci, Bekir Tugcu, Mine Zahide Yazici.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare sinonasal complications after microscopic and endoscopic approaches for pituitary adenomas.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: At our clinic, sinonasal complications occurred in 31 patients who underwent microscopic transsphenoidal surgery between 2007 and 2014 and in 32 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery between 2014 and 2016. We statistically compared the complications observed during endoscopic sinonasal examination performed by an otorhinolaryngologist.
RESULTS: Sinonasal pathology occurred in 22 of the 31 patients (70.9%) in the microscopy group (Group 1) and 19 of the 32 (59.3%) in the endoscopy group (Group 2). Of the 31 patients in Group 1, 13 had nasal septal perforation, 13 had nasal synechiae, three had anosmia, two had hyposmia and one had saddle nose deformity. In Group 2, no patient had nasal septal perforation, whereas eight had nasal synechiae, one had anosmia, 11 had hyposmia, and 4 had infection.
CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences in sinonasal complications (e.g. synechiae, anosmia, deformity, and sinusitis) between the two groups. Although the perforation rate (especially for perforations in the middle portion of the septum) was statistically greater in Group 1 than in Group 2, the hyposmia rate was statistically greater in Group 2 than in Group 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368316     DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.21588-17.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Neurosurg        ISSN: 1019-5149            Impact factor:   1.003


  5 in total

1.  Systematic review and network meta-analysis assess the comparative efficacy and safety of transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumor.

Authors:  Wei Dai; Zong Zhuang; Haiping Ling; Yongbo Yang; Chunhua Hang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Olfactory outcomes after endonasal skull base surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Junhao Zhu; Kaiyang Feng; Chao Tang; Jin Yang; Xiangming Cai; Chunyu Zhong; Chiyuan Ma
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Equivalent outcomes in nasal symptoms following microscopic or endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: results from multi-centre, prospective study.

Authors:  Charlie Osborne; Daniel Lewis; Ben Dixon; Carmela Caputo; Alison Magee; Kanna Gnanalingham; Yi Yuen Wang
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Incidence and Management of Delayed Epistaxis Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Zahide Mine Yazıcı; Ömür Günaldı; Osman Tanrıverdi; Selçuk Güneş; Filiz Gülüstan; Recep Haydar Koç; İbrahim Sayın
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-26

5.  Risk Factors for Patient-Reported Olfactory Dysfunction After Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy.

Authors:  Jake J Lee; Zindzi S Thompson; Jay F Piccirillo; Cristine N Klatt-Cromwell; Hilary L P Orlowski; Dorina Kallogjeri; Patrik Pipkorn; John S Schneider
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.