Literature DB >> 29368106

Field Testing of IAP2015 Charts.

Nikhil Lohiya1, Vaman Khadilkar2, Shubhadarshini Pawar1, Anuradha Khadilkar3, Shashi Chiplonkar2, Rahul Jahagirdar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To field test the IAP2015 (Indian Academy of Pediatrics) charts in different socioeconomic classes; to compare standard deviation scores (Z-scores) of children's height, weight and body mass index (BMI) for age as computed based on IAP2007 or WHO charts against the IAP2015 references.
METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the district of Pune on apparently healthy 5-18 y old children from urban affluent, urban underprivileged and rural areas. Anthropometric measurements were performed and parameters were converted into Z-scores.
RESULTS: Urban affluent children were tallest and heaviest whereas urban underprivileged children were shortest. Z-score comparison showed that all children were shortest on WHO references and taller as per IAP2007 references. BMI Z-score was higher on IAP2007 charts and lower on WHO references. Highest number of children were within the reference range on IAP2015 charts among urban affluent. More children were classified stunted on WHO references and least on IAP2007 references. WHO references overestimated wasting and as per IAP2007 charts, less number were wasted. Less number of children were classified as being obese/overweight by WHO and IAP2007 references.
CONCLUSIONS: IAP2015 charts are better representative of healthy children of current generation and may be used to prevent inappropriate classification in present scenario.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Growth charts; IAP2015 charts; India; Reference growth curve

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368106     DOI: 10.1007/s12098-018-2621-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


  14 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional status of the Indian population.

Authors:  S Rao
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Revised IAP growth charts for height, weight and body mass index for 5- to 18-year-old Indian children.

Authors:  Vaman Khadilkar; Sangeeta Yadav; K K Agrawal; Suchit Tamboli; Monidipa Banerjee; Alice Cherian; Jagdish P Goyal; Anuradha Khadilkar; V Kumaravel; V Mohan; D Narayanappa; I Ray; Vijay Yewale
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.411

3.  Height of conscripts in Europe: is postneonatal mortality a predictor?

Authors:  I M Schmidt; M H Jørgensen; K F Michaelsen
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.533

4.  German height references for children aged 0 to under 18 years compared to WHO and CDC growth charts.

Authors:  Angelika Schaffrath Rosario; Anja Schienkiewitz; Hannelore Neuhauser
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Height of South Asian children in the Netherlands aged 0-20 years: secular trends and comparisons with current Asian Indian, Dutch and WHO references.

Authors:  Jeroen A de Wilde; Paula van Dommelen; Stef van Buuren; Barend J C Middelkoop
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.533

6.  Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mercedes de Onis; Adelheid W Onyango; Elaine Borghi; Amani Siyam; Chizuru Nishida; Jonathan Siekmann
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  The secular trend in human physical growth: a biological view.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.184

Review 8.  Secular trends in growth.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.297

9.  Construction of a new growth references for China based on urban Chinese children: comparison with the WHO growth standards.

Authors:  Xin-Nan Zong; Hui Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  First growth curves based on the World Health Organization reference in a Nationally-Representative Sample of Pediatric Population in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): the CASPIAN-III study.

Authors:  Marjan Mansourian; Hamid Reza Marateb; Roya Kelishadi; Mohammad Esmaeil Motlagh; Tahereh Aminaee; Mahnaz Taslimi; Reza Majdzadeh; Ramin Heshmat; Gelayol Ardalan; Parinaz Poursafa
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.125

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Coming of Age of IAP 2015 Growth Charts: The Way Forward.

Authors:  Anurag Bajpai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Comparison of Nutrition Status as Assessed by Revised IAP 2015 Growth Charts and CDC 2000 Growth Charts in Lower Socioeconomic Class School Children.

Authors:  Sarala Premkumar; Padmasani Venkatramanan; J Dhivyalakshmi; T Gayathri
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Field Testing of Synthetic Growth Charts in 1-60-Month-Old Indian Children.

Authors:  Sajili Mehta; Chirantap Oza; Madhura Karguppikar; Vaman Khadilkar; Anuradha Khadilkar
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-06-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.