| Literature DB >> 29368055 |
Deniz Sahin1, Ezgi Tas2, Ulkü Hüma Altindag2.
Abstract
Schizochytrium species is one of the most studied microalgae for production of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) which is an omega-3 fatty acid with positive effects for human health. However, high cost and low yield in production phase makes optimization of cultivation process inevitable. We focus on the optimization of DHA production using Schizochytrium sp. using different media supplements; glucose, fructose and glycerol as carbon variants, proteose peptone and tryptone as nitrogen variants. The highest biomass (5.61 g/L) and total fatty acid yield (1.74 g/L) were obtained in proteose peptone medium which was used as the alternative nitrogen source instead of yeast extract. The highest DHA yield (0.40 g/L) was achieved with glycerol as the carbon source although it had the second lowest biomass production after ethanol containing medium. Ethanol, as an alternative carbon source and a precursor for acetyl-CoA, increased DHA percentage in total lipid content from 29.94 to 40.04% but decreasing the biomass drastically. Considering different carbon and nitrogen sources during cultivation of Schizochytrium sp. will improve DHA production. Combination of proteose peptone and glycerol as nitrogen and carbon sources, respectively, and addition of ethanol with a proper timing will be useful to have higher DHA yield.Entities:
Keywords: DHA; Omega-3; Polyunsaturated fatty acids; Schizochytrium sp.
Year: 2018 PMID: 29368055 PMCID: PMC5783985 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0540-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Growth curve of Schizochytrium sp. in different mediums: Schizochytrium sp. were grown in CM, CM + E, FM, TM, GM, PPM mediums with total 144 h incubation. The highest cell biomass during incubation was achieved at 72th hours in TM, GM, PPM while in CM and FM it was achieved at 48th hours. CM + E has shown lower biomass accumulation pattern in comparison with other mediums. The cell density pattern in FM, GM and PPM has shown highest value at 72th hours and TM has shown the very near results at 48 and 72th hours for the highest cell density. In CM, highest cell density was achieved at 96th hours. In CM + E cell density has not changed significantly after introduction of ethanol at 24th hours and it was rather lower than other mediums
Fig. 2Dry cell weight, Total fatty acid yield and DHA yields in CM (1), CM + E (2), FM (3), TM (4), GM (5) and PPM (6) media
Fig. 3pH variation with time for each medium
Fatty acid compositions (%:w/v) according to Gas chromatography-FID analysis of obtained total fatty acids (Additional file 1)
| CM | CM + E | FM | TM | GM | PPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 | ||||||
| Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6 n-3) | 29.94 | 40.04 | 26.53 | 24.81 | 48.75 | 34.13 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5 n-3) | 1.48 | 6.05 | 1.54 | 1.22 | 3.8 | 1.71 |
| Linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3) | 0.07 | – | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Omega-6 | ||||||
| γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3 n-6) | 0.2 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Arachidonic acid (C20:4 n-6) | 0.61 | 2.73 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 1.69 | 0.71 |
| | 0.35 | 0.11 | – | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.35 |
| Others | ||||||
| Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) | 28.67 | 18.47 | 26.79 | 29.71 | 14.4 | 22.63 |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 20.19 | 15.81 | 24.38 | 22.79 | 17.81 | 21.4 |
| Margaric acid (C17:0) | 9.76 | 6.14 | 9.28 | 8.02 | 6.74 | 8.32 |
| Myristic acid (C14:0) | 4.79 | 3.19 | 6.48 | 5.58 | 2.47 | 4.01 |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 1.61 | 3.92 | 1.59 | 1.41 | 2.26 | 1.37 |
| Tridecanoic acid (C13:0) | 1.57 | 1.33 | 1.57 | 1.87 | 0.56 | 1.04 |
| Lauric acid (C12:0) | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.18 |
| Undecanoic acid (C11:0) | 0.13 | – | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Oleic acid (C11:1n + 9c) | 0.09 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.01 |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) | 0.09 | 0.96 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.08 |
| Lignoceric acid (C24:0) | 0.07 | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.13 |
| Arachidic acid (C20:0) | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Behenic acid (C22:0) | 0.03 | – | – | – | 0.09 | 0.03 |
| γ-Linoleic acid (C18:2n + 6c) | 0.02 | – | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Heneicosanoic acid (C21:0) | 0.01 | – | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.29 |
| Heptadecenoic acid (C17:1) | 0.01 | – | 0.01 | – | – | – |
| Tricosanoic acid (C23:0) | – | – | – | 2.83 | 0.07 | 3.22 |
CM complex medium, FM fructose medium, TM tryptone medium, GM glycerol medium, PPM proteose peptone medium
Overall comparison of total biomass production and DHA yields and EPA yields for all media
| Total biomass (g/L) | DHA yield (g/L) | EPA yield (g/L) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM | 5.15 (± 0.09) | 0.33 (± 0.005) | 0.016 (± 0.0005) | This study |
| CM + E | 1.48 (± 0.09) | 0.27 (± 0.015) | 0.041 (± 0.0025) | This study |
| FM | 5.01 (± 0.07) | 0.36 (± 0.01) | 0.021 (± 0.00065) | This study |
| TM | 5.36 (± 0.12) | 0.34 (± 0.005) | 0.017 (± 0.00035) | This study |
| GM | 3.58 (± 0.12) | 0.40 (± 0.015) | 0.031 (± 0.001) | This study |
| PPM | 5.61 (± 0.1) | 0.59 (± 0.01) | 0.029 (± 0.0005) | This study |
| CM | 5.510 | 0.308 | – | Wu et al. ( |
| FM | 5.245 | 0.251 | – | Wu et al. ( |
| TM | 2.133 | 0.178 | – | Wu et al. ( |
| PPM | 5.220 | 0.084 | – | Wu et al. ( |
| CM | 8.78 ± 0.55 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | – | Zhu et al. ( |
| FM | 9.02 ± 0.38 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | – | Zhu et al. ( |
| TM | 11.07 ± 0.52 | 0.79 ± 0.11 | – | Zhu et al. ( |
| PPM | 8.34 ± 0.42 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | – | Zhu et al. ( |
| GM | 12.18 ± 0.47 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | – | Zhu et al. ( |
| CM | ~ 15.1 | ~ 0.7 | ~ 0.00184 | Yokochi et al. ( |
| FM | ~ 13.66 | ~ 0.93 | ~ 0.00666 | Yokochi et al. ( |
| TM | ~ 3.3 | ~ 0.34 | Trace | Yokochi et al. ( |
| GM | ~ 15.1 | ~ 1.33 | ~ 0.021 | Yokochi et al. ( |
CM complex medium, FM fructose medium, TM tryptone medium, GM glycerol medium, PPM proteose peptone medium