BACKGROUND: Identification of large vessel occlusions (LVO) is important with recent guidelines supporting endovascular therapy in selected acute ischemic stroke patients. Many stroke centers perform CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected LVO, however this requires additional time and contrast administration. Non-enhanced CT maximum intensity projection (NECT-MIPs) may offer a rapid alternative to CTA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed acute stroke patients with LVO in the UCSD Stroke Registry, presenting between 6/2014-7/2016. NECT-MIPs were evaluated for presence of LVO. Gold standard comparison was to CTA. Results were stratified by level of training (Faculty, Fellow and Acute Care Practitioners [ACPs]). Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa Coefficient. RESULTS: We reviewed 24 patients using NECT-MIPs for the detection of LVO. Faculty had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% & 92% for ICA/M1, 42% & 100% for M2, and 67% & 96% for basilar occlusions. Fellows and ACPs had a sensitivity and specificity of 61% & 94% for ICA/M1, 19% & 83% for M2, and 75% & 95% for basilar occlusions. Inter-rater agreement among Faculty readers was k=0.75 for ICA/M1, k=0.79 for M2 and k=0.14 for basilar occlusions. Among Fellows and ACPs, k=0.57 for ICA/M1, k=0.40 for M2, and k=0.27 for basilar occlusions. CONCLUSIONS: NECT-MIPs have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LVO when compared to CTA. Inter-rater agreement is fair and higher amongst more experienced reviewers. These results suggest that NECT-MIPs may be helpful to streamline the identification of LVO and reduce door to needle and door to intervention times.
BACKGROUND: Identification of large vessel occlusions (LVO) is important with recent guidelines supporting endovascular therapy in selected acute ischemic stroke patients. Many stroke centers perform CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected LVO, however this requires additional time and contrast administration. Non-enhanced CT maximum intensity projection (NECT-MIPs) may offer a rapid alternative to CTA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed acute stroke patients with LVO in the UCSD Stroke Registry, presenting between 6/2014-7/2016. NECT-MIPs were evaluated for presence of LVO. Gold standard comparison was to CTA. Results were stratified by level of training (Faculty, Fellow and Acute Care Practitioners [ACPs]). Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa Coefficient. RESULTS: We reviewed 24 patients using NECT-MIPs for the detection of LVO. Faculty had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% & 92% for ICA/M1, 42% & 100% for M2, and 67% & 96% for basilar occlusions. Fellows and ACPs had a sensitivity and specificity of 61% & 94% for ICA/M1, 19% & 83% for M2, and 75% & 95% for basilar occlusions. Inter-rater agreement among Faculty readers was k=0.75 for ICA/M1, k=0.79 for M2 and k=0.14 for basilar occlusions. Among Fellows and ACPs, k=0.57 for ICA/M1, k=0.40 for M2, and k=0.27 for basilar occlusions. CONCLUSIONS: NECT-MIPs have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LVO when compared to CTA. Inter-rater agreement is fair and higher amongst more experienced reviewers. These results suggest that NECT-MIPs may be helpful to streamline the identification of LVO and reduce door to needle and door to intervention times.
Authors: Christian H Riedel; Ulf Jensen; Axel Rohr; Marc Tietke; Karsten Alfke; Stephan Ulmer; Olav Jansen Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heinrich P Mattle; Marcel Arnold; Dimitrios Georgiadis; Christian Baumann; Krassen Nedeltchev; David Benninger; Luca Remonda; Christian von Büdingen; Anca Diana; Athina Pangalu; Gerhard Schroth; Ralf W Baumgartner Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170