| Literature DB >> 29367503 |
Yutaro Sasaki1, Keito Shiozaki1, Takeshi Miyake1, Kazuyoshi Izumi1, Tomoteru Kishimoto1, Masahito Yamanaka1, Yasuo Kawanishi1.
Abstract
(Objectives) Surgical treatment prostate cancer in elderly patients is controversial. However, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a less invasive procedure than conventional surgery. Therefore, we perform RARP for elderly patients whose general condition is good (Performance status ≤1). The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical, oncological and functional outcomes for RARP in men age 75 and older. (Patients and methods) From July 2013 to April 2016, 300 patients underwent RARP at our institution. They were divided into two groups: an older patient group (≥75 years) and a younger patient group (<75 years). Treatment outcomes for each group, including surgical, oncological and functional outcomes, were compared. (Results) There were no statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes with the exception of nerve sparing rates (older patients: 5.9% vs. younger patients: 17.7%, P=0.0192). Importantly, intra- and postoperative complication rates were similar in both groups (minor complication: 7.4% vs. 3.9%, P=0.322, major complication: 0.0% vs. 2.2%, P=0.592). Regarding oncological outcomes, including positive surgical margin rate and PSA failure (PSA>0.2 ng/ml) at 12 months after surgery, no significant differences existed. Lastly, functional outcomes between the groups, including continence (≤1 pads/day) at 12 months after surgery, had no significant differences. (Conclusions) Our data suggests that RARP can be performed safely for men age 75 and older, and can become a good option for older patients with prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: age 75 and older; older patients; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29367503 DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol.108.12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi ISSN: 0021-5287