Literature DB >> 29367406

Cortical Neural Activity Predicts Sensory Acuity Under Optogenetic Manipulation.

John J Briguglio1,2,3, Mark Aizenberg2, Vijay Balasubramanian1, Maria N Geffen4.   

Abstract

Excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the mammalian sensory cortex form interconnected circuits that control cortical stimulus selectivity and sensory acuity. Theoretical studies have predicted that suppression of inhibition in such excitatory-inhibitory networks can lead to either an increase or, paradoxically, a decrease in excitatory neuronal firing, with consequent effects on stimulus selectivity. We tested whether modulation of inhibition or excitation in the auditory cortex of male mice could evoke such a variety of effects in tone-evoked responses and in behavioral frequency discrimination acuity. We found that, indeed, the effects of optogenetic manipulation on stimulus selectivity and behavior varied in both magnitude and sign across subjects, possibly reflecting differences in circuitry or expression of optogenetic factors. Changes in neural population responses consistently predicted behavioral changes for individuals separately, including improvement and impairment in acuity. This correlation between cortical and behavioral change demonstrates that, despite the complex and varied effects that these manipulations can have on neuronal dynamics, the resulting changes in cortical activity account for accompanying changes in behavioral acuity.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Excitatory and inhibitory interactions determine stimulus specificity and tuning in sensory cortex, thereby controlling perceptual discrimination acuity. Modeling has predicted that suppressing the activity of inhibitory neurons can lead to increased or, paradoxically, decreased excitatory activity depending on the architecture of the network. Here, we capitalized on differences between subjects to test whether suppressing/activating inhibition and excitation can in fact exhibit such paradoxical effects for both stimulus sensitivity and behavioral discriminability. Indeed, the same optogenetic manipulation in the auditory cortex of different mice could improve or impair frequency discrimination acuity, predictable from the effects on cortical responses to tones. The same manipulations sometimes produced opposite changes in the behavior of different individuals, supporting theoretical predictions for inhibition-stabilized networks.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/382094-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; behavior; computational modeling; excitatory–inhibitory circuits; frequency discrimination; optogenetics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29367406      PMCID: PMC5824743          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2457-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  58 in total

1.  Multimodal fast optical interrogation of neural circuitry.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Li-Ping Wang; Martin Brauner; Jana F Liewald; Kenneth Kay; Natalie Watzke; Phillip G Wood; Ernst Bamberg; Georg Nagel; Alexander Gottschalk; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Immersive audiomotor game play enhances neural and perceptual salience of weak signals in noise.

Authors:  Jonathon P Whitton; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Plasticity of cortical excitatory-inhibitory balance.

Authors:  Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Genetics of age-related hearing loss in mice: I. Inbred and F1 hybrid strains.

Authors:  L C Erway; J F Willott; J R Archer; D E Harrison
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Decoding of MSTd population activity accounts for variations in the precision of heading perception.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Christopher R Fetsch; Babatunde Adeyemo; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Targeted optogenetic stimulation and recording of neurons in vivo using cell-type-specific expression of Channelrhodopsin-2.

Authors:  Jessica A Cardin; Marie Carlén; Konstantinos Meletis; Ulf Knoblich; Feng Zhang; Karl Deisseroth; Li-Huei Tsai; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Differential dynamic plasticity of A1 receptive fields during multiple spectral tasks.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Optogenetics.

Authors:  Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Selective Impairment in Frequency Discrimination in a Mouse Model of Tinnitus.

Authors:  Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Andrew J O Davis; Mark Aizenberg; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Activation of specific interneurons improves V1 feature selectivity and visual perception.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Lee; Alex C Kwan; Siyu Zhang; Victoria Phoumthipphavong; John G Flannery; Sotiris C Masmanidis; Hiroki Taniguchi; Z Josh Huang; Feng Zhang; Edward S Boyden; Karl Deisseroth; Yang Dan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory Cortex Contributes to Discrimination of Pure Tones.

Authors:  Conor O'Sullivan; Aldis P Weible; Michael Wehr
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-10-16

2.  Neuronal activity in sensory cortex predicts the specificity of learning in mice.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Christopher F Angeloni; Karmi Oxman; Claudia Clopath; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 17.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.