INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia screening protocols have been recommended to identify patients at risk for aspiration. The American Heart Association convened an evidence review committee to systematically review evidence for the effectiveness of dysphagia screening protocols to reduce the risk of pneumonia, death, or dependency after stroke. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on November 1, 2016, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dysphagia screening protocols or quality interventions with increased dysphagia screening rates and reporting outcomes of pneumonia, death, or dependency. RESULTS: Three RCTs were identified. One RCT found that a combined nursing quality improvement intervention targeting fever and glucose management and dysphagia screening reduced death and dependency but without reducing the pneumonia rate. Another RCT failed to find evidence that pneumonia rates were reduced by adding the cough reflex to routine dysphagia screening. A smaller RCT randomly assigned 2 hospital wards to a stroke care pathway including dysphagia screening or regular care and found that patients on the stroke care pathway were less likely to require intubation and mechanical ventilation; however, the study was small and at risk for bias. CONCLUSIONS: There were insufficient RCT data to determine the effect of dysphagia screening protocols on reducing the rates of pneumonia, death, or dependency after stroke. Additional trials are needed to compare the validity, feasibility, and clinical effectiveness of different screening methods for dysphagia.
INTRODUCTION:Dysphagia screening protocols have been recommended to identify patients at risk for aspiration. The American Heart Association convened an evidence review committee to systematically review evidence for the effectiveness of dysphagia screening protocols to reduce the risk of pneumonia, death, or dependency after stroke. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on November 1, 2016, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dysphagia screening protocols or quality interventions with increased dysphagia screening rates and reporting outcomes of pneumonia, death, or dependency. RESULTS: Three RCTs were identified. One RCT found that a combined nursing quality improvement intervention targeting fever and glucose management and dysphagia screening reduced death and dependency but without reducing the pneumonia rate. Another RCT failed to find evidence that pneumonia rates were reduced by adding the cough reflex to routine dysphagia screening. A smaller RCT randomly assigned 2 hospital wards to a stroke care pathway including dysphagia screening or regular care and found that patients on the stroke care pathway were less likely to require intubation and mechanical ventilation; however, the study was small and at risk for bias. CONCLUSIONS: There were insufficient RCT data to determine the effect of dysphagia screening protocols on reducing the rates of pneumonia, death, or dependency after stroke. Additional trials are needed to compare the validity, feasibility, and clinical effectiveness of different screening methods for dysphagia.
Authors: Barbara Schumacher Finnegan; Melissa M Meighan; Noelani C Warren; Meghan K Hatfield; Stacey Alexeeff; Jorge Lipiz; Mai Nguyen-Huynh Journal: Perm J Date: 2020-12
Authors: Huijuan Zhang; Ahmed Nagy; Corrin Bowman; Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon; Alexander Hu; Jonathan Lovell; Catriona M Steele; Jun Xia Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Catriona M Steele; Rajat Mukherjee; Juha M Kortelainen; Harri Pölönen; Michael Jedwab; Susan L Brady; Kayla Brinkman Theimer; Susan Langmore; Luis F Riquelme; Nancy B Swigert; Philip M Bath; Larry B Goldstein; Richard L Hughes; Dana Leifer; Kennedy R Lees; Atte Meretoja; Natalia Muehlemann Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2019-01-05 Impact factor: 3.438