Jo M Longman1, Catherine M Adams2, Jennifer J Johnston3, Megan E Passey3. 1. University of Sydney School of Public Health (University Centre for Rural Health - North Coast), Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia. Electronic address: Jo.longman@ucrh.edu.au. 2. Northern NSW Local Health District, Lismore, Australia. 3. University of Sydney School of Public Health (University Centre for Rural Health - North Coast), Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia; Northern NSW Local Health District, Lismore, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to explore the enablers and barriers to implementation of the Australian smoking cessation in pregnancy guidelines. These guidelines direct clinicians to follow the 5As of cessation: Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange follow-up. DESIGN: semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) elicited clinicians' views and experiences of implementing the guidelines. SETTING: antenatal care in the NSW public health system. PARTICIPANTS: 27 maternity service managers, obstetricians and midwives. FINDINGS: participants confirmed that implementation of the smoking cessation guidelines was sub-optimal. This was particularly the case with Assist and Arrange follow up at the initial visit, and with following any of the 5As at subsequent visits. Key barriers included systems which did not support implementation or monitoring, lack of knowledge, skills and training, perceived time restrictions, 'difficult conversations' and perceiving smoking as a social activity. Enablers included clinicians' knowledge of the harms of smoking in pregnancy, clinicians' skills in communicating with pregnant women, positive emotions, professional role and identity, the potential of training and of champions to influence practice, and systems that regulated behaviour. KEY CONCLUSIONS: these findings will contribute to the development of a multifaceted intervention to support clinicians in implementing the guidelines. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Building on existing strengths, antenatal care providers may be supported in implementing the guidelines by working with systems which remind and support implementation, the clear reframing of smoking as an addiction, knowledge and skills development and by realizing the potential of leadership to maximise the impact of reinforcement and social influence.
OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to explore the enablers and barriers to implementation of the Australian smoking cessation in pregnancy guidelines. These guidelines direct clinicians to follow the 5As of cessation: Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange follow-up. DESIGN: semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) elicited clinicians' views and experiences of implementing the guidelines. SETTING: antenatal care in the NSW public health system. PARTICIPANTS: 27 maternity service managers, obstetricians and midwives. FINDINGS:participants confirmed that implementation of the smoking cessation guidelines was sub-optimal. This was particularly the case with Assist and Arrange follow up at the initial visit, and with following any of the 5As at subsequent visits. Key barriers included systems which did not support implementation or monitoring, lack of knowledge, skills and training, perceived time restrictions, 'difficult conversations' and perceiving smoking as a social activity. Enablers included clinicians' knowledge of the harms of smoking in pregnancy, clinicians' skills in communicating with pregnant women, positive emotions, professional role and identity, the potential of training and of champions to influence practice, and systems that regulated behaviour. KEY CONCLUSIONS: these findings will contribute to the development of a multifaceted intervention to support clinicians in implementing the guidelines. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Building on existing strengths, antenatal care providers may be supported in implementing the guidelines by working with systems which remind and support implementation, the clear reframing of smoking as an addiction, knowledge and skills development and by realizing the potential of leadership to maximise the impact of reinforcement and social influence.
Authors: Yu Zhen Lau; Kate Widdows; Stephen A Roberts; Sheher Khizar; Gillian L Stephen; Saima Rauf; Alexander E P Heazell Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2020-04
Authors: Trevor Kwan; Benjamin Chua; David Pires; Olivia Feng; Natalie Edmiston; Jo Longman Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Megan E Passey; Jo M Longman; Catherine Adams; Jennifer J Johnston; Jessica Simms; Margaret Rolfe Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 3.007