Wenhao Zheng1, Zhenyu Tao1, Chunhui Chen1, Chuanxu Zhang1, Hui Zhang1, Zhenhua Feng1, Hang Li1, Liang Cheng1, Leyi Cai1, Hua Chen2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China. Electronic address: chenhuafey@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of dual ESIN (D-ESIN) fixation, hybrid fixation, and open reduction and dual plate (d-plate) fixation in the treatment of dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 137 patients with dual-bone forearm fractures (48 patients in the D-ESIN group, 45 patients in the hybrid group, and 44 patients in the d-plate group) were reviewed. Duration of surgery, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy, and duration of postoperative immobilisation were recorded. Radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rate were also recorded. RESULTS: Surgeries and incisions were significantly shorter, and less intraoperative blood loss occurred, in the hybrid group than the d-plate group (P < 0.001). The hybrid group was also characterised by less intraoperative fluoroscopy times and shorter duration of postoperative immobilisation compared with the D-ESIN group (P < 0.001). The union rate of the ulna at 3 months postoperatively was higher in the hybrid and d-plate groups than in the D-ESIN group (P = 0.003). The union rate of the radius was similar in all three groups (P = 0.403). No significant difference in the union rate of the radius or ulna was observed among groups at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.052). The mean union time was notably later in the D-ESIN group than in the hybrid and d-plate groups. However, no significant difference in functional outcome or complication rate was observed among the three groups (P = 0.822 and P = 0.912). CONCLUSION: Hybrid fixation was superior in terms of the duration of surgery, intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative immobilisation, delayed union of the ulna, and bone union time. Therefore, hybrid fixation is a safe and effective treatment for dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of dual ESIN (D-ESIN) fixation, hybrid fixation, and open reduction and dual plate (d-plate) fixation in the treatment of dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 137 patients with dual-bone forearm fractures (48 patients in the D-ESIN group, 45 patients in the hybrid group, and 44 patients in the d-plate group) were reviewed. Duration of surgery, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy, and duration of postoperative immobilisation were recorded. Radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rate were also recorded. RESULTS: Surgeries and incisions were significantly shorter, and less intraoperative blood loss occurred, in the hybrid group than the d-plate group (P < 0.001). The hybrid group was also characterised by less intraoperative fluoroscopy times and shorter duration of postoperative immobilisation compared with the D-ESIN group (P < 0.001). The union rate of the ulna at 3 months postoperatively was higher in the hybrid and d-plate groups than in the D-ESIN group (P = 0.003). The union rate of the radius was similar in all three groups (P = 0.403). No significant difference in the union rate of the radius or ulna was observed among groups at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.052). The mean union time was notably later in the D-ESIN group than in the hybrid and d-plate groups. However, no significant difference in functional outcome or complication rate was observed among the three groups (P = 0.822 and P = 0.912). CONCLUSION: Hybrid fixation was superior in terms of the duration of surgery, intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative immobilisation, delayed union of the ulna, and bone union time. Therefore, hybrid fixation is a safe and effective treatment for dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years.