Literature DB >> 29366711

Screening for recommended antenatal risk factors: How long does it take?

Amy Waller1, Jamie Bryant2, Emilie Cameron2, Mohamed Galal3, Ian Symonds4, Rob Sanson-Fisher2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detection and management of antenatal risk factors is critical for quality care. AIMS: To determine (1) women's views about when they should be asked about antenatal health factors as recommended in the Australian antenatal guidelines; and (2) the time required to provide recommended care using a clinical scenario.
METHODS: In Phase 1, pregnant women attending an outpatient obstetrics clinic at a public hospital were surveyed about preferred screening for antenatal risk factors during visit(s). In Phase 2, a hypothetical clinical scenario of a woman attending her first antenatal visit with a practising midwife was video-recorded to extrapolate the time taken to ask about and offer assistance to manage clinical, screening and lifestyle risk factors.
FINDINGS: Most women (96%) perceived they should be asked about each of the risk factors at least once (i.e. at first visit). Total time taken to ask about all risk factors was 52min. More time was spent discussing clinical (11min) than lifestyle factors (4min). Adjusting for the estimated prevalence of each risk factor, the time taken to offer assistance was 8min per woman. Average time required for detecting and offering assistance to manage risk factors is 60min per average risk woman.
CONCLUSION: Women are willing to be asked about risk factors; however this process is time-consuming. Strategies to streamline visits and prioritise recommendations so time-efficient yet comprehensive care can be delivered are needed, particularly when factors require monitoring over time and for those who may be 'at-risk' for multiple factors.
Copyright © 2018 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Antenatal care; Guidelines; Pregnancy; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29366711     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  3 in total

1.  Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for South Australian pregnant women with cardiac conditions between 2003 and 2013.

Authors:  Sandra Millington; Margaret Arstall; Gustaaf Dekker; Judith Magarey; Robyn Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Number of antenatal care utilization and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: zero-inflated Poisson regression of 2019 intermediate Ethiopian Demography Health Survey.

Authors:  Mastewal Arefaynie; Bereket Kefale; Melaku Yalew; Bezawit Adane; Reta Dewau; Yitayish Damtie
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Opening the door: midwives' perceptions of two models of psychosocial assessment in pregnancy- a mixed methods study.

Authors:  V Schmied; N Reilly; E Black; D Kingston; K Talcevska; V Mule; M-P Austin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.