Literature DB >> 29366641

Subcutaneous Fat Distribution is a Prognostic Biomarker for Men with Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Jong Soo Lee1, Hye Sun Lee2, Jee Soo Ha1, Kyung Suk Han3, Koon Ho Rha3, Sung Joon Hong3, Byung Ha Chung1, Kyo Chul Koo4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship between body fat distribution and survival remains unclear in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and androgen receptor axis targeted agents. We investigated whether body composition parameters could predict radiographic progression-free and cancer specific survival in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study we evaluated data on 282 consecutive patients diagnosed with castration resistant prostate cancer between September 2009 and March 2017. The subcutaneous fat index, the visceral fat index and the skeletal muscle index at the diagnosis of castration resistant prostate cancer were determined by computerized tomography data. Survival analyses were performed using the subcutaneous fat, visceral fat and skeletal muscle indexes dichotomized at 39.9, 58 and 52.4 cm2/m2, respectively.
RESULTS: At the diagnosis of castration resistant prostate cancer, cancer specific survival was independently predicted using prostate specific antigen levels, Gleason score 8 or greater, performance status, a shorter interval from androgen deprivation therapy to castration resistant prostate cancer and a subcutaneous fat index of less than 39.9 cm2/m2. During the median followup of 16.0 months patients with a subcutaneous fat index of 39.9 cm2/m2 or greater received more docetaxel cycles than patients with a subcutaneous fat index of less than 39.9 cm2/m2. Compared to patients with a subcutaneous fat index of less than 39.9 cm2/m2 those with an index of 39.9 cm2/m2 or greater had better 1-year progression-free and 2-year cancer specific survival (p = 0.009 and 0.021, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a subcutaneous fat index of 39.9 cm2/m2 or greater at the diagnosis of castration resistant prostate cancer showed higher progression-free and cancer specific survival rates than those with a subcutaneous fat index of less 39.9 cm2/m2 at diagnosis. The subcutaneous fat index determined by computerized tomography data could serve as a useful objective prognostic factor to discuss patient therapeutic options. Further studies are needed to define the roles of each body composition parameter in relation to pharmacokinetics and oncologic outcome.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  castration-resistant; mortality; prognosis; prostatic neoplasms; subcutaneous fat; tomography; x-ray computed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29366641     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Pre-treatment ratio of periprostatic to subcutaneous fat thickness on MRI is an independent survival predictor in hormone-naïve men with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Yusuke Sugino; Manabu Kato; Kouhei Nishikawa; Hideki Kanda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Adiposity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Bette J Caan; En Cheng; Jocelyn Kirley
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.532

3.  Association of Body Composition With Survival and Treatment Efficacy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sahyun Pak; Myeong Seong Kim; Eun Young Park; Sung Han Kim; Kang Hyun Lee; Jae Young Joung
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  CT-based assessment of body composition following neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in patients with castration-naïve oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sara Sheikhbahaei; Diane K Reyes; Steven P Rowe; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Influence of body composition and muscle strength on outcomes after multimodal oesophageal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Eliza R C Hagens; Minke L Feenstra; Maarten A van Egmond; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Piers R Boshier; Donald E Low; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 12.910

6.  Opportunistic skeletal muscle metrics as prognostic tools in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients candidates to receive Radium-223.

Authors:  Matteo Bauckneht; Rita Lai; Francesca D'Amico; Alberto Miceli; Maria Isabella Donegani; Cristina Campi; Daniela Schenone; Stefano Raffa; Silvia Chiola; Francesco Lanfranchi; Sara Elena Rebuzzi; Elisa Zanardi; Malvina Cremante; Cecilia Marini; Giuseppe Fornarini; Silvia Morbelli; Michele Piana; Gianmario Sambuceti
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.668

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.