Literature DB >> 29366560

Lumbar loads and trunk kinematics in people with a transtibial amputation during sit-to-stand.

Jason A Actis1, Luis A Nolasco2, Deanna H Gates2, Anne K Silverman3.   

Abstract

People with a transtibial amputation have numerous secondary health conditions, including an increased prevalence of low back pain. This increased prevalence may be partially explained by altered low back biomechanics during movement. The purpose of this study was to compare trunk kinematics and L4-L5 lumbar loads in people with and without a transtibial amputation during sit-to-stand. Motion capture, ground reaction force and electromyographic data were collected from eight people with a unilateral transtibial amputation and eight people without an amputation during five self-paced sit-to-stand motions. A musculoskeletal model of the torso, lumbar spine, pelvis, lower limbs, and 294 muscles was used in a static optimization framework to quantify L4-L5 loads, low back muscle forces, and trunk kinematics. Participants with an amputation had greater peak and average L4-L5 loading in compression compared to control participants, with peak loading occurring shortly after liftoff from the chair. At the instant of peak loading, participants with an amputation had significantly greater segmental trunk lateral bending and trunk-pelvis axial rotation toward the intact side, and significantly greater segmental trunk axial rotation toward the prosthetic side compared to control participants. Participants with an amputation also had greater peak frontal plane and transverse plane segmental trunk angular velocity. The postural differences observed in people with a transtibial amputation were consistent with their ground reaction force asymmetry. The cumulative effects of the altered movement strategy used by people with an amputation may result in an increased risk for low back pain development over time.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Below-knee amputation; Biomechanics; Low back pain; Musculoskeletal modeling; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29366560     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Trunk muscle forces and spinal loads in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit activities.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Brad D Hendershot; Julian C Acasio; Christopher L Dearth; Matthew Ballard; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Limb Kinematics, Kinetics and Muscle Dynamics During the Sit-to-Stand Transition in Greyhounds.

Authors:  Richard G Ellis; Jeffery W Rankin; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-16

3.  ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2019: biomechanical changes in dynamic sagittal balance and lower limb compensatory strategies following realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity patients.

Authors:  Jeannie F Bailey; Robert P Matthew; Sarah Seko; Patrick Curran; Leslie Chu; Sigurd H Berven; Vedat Deviren; Shane Burch; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Statistical analysis of timeseries data reveals changes in 3D segmental coordination of balance in response to prosthetic ankle power on ramps.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Pickle; Anne K Silverman; Jason M Wilken; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Compensatory biomechanics and spinal loading during dynamic maneuvers in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Priya Nyayapati; Jacqueline Booker; Peter I-Kung Wu; Alekos Theologis; Lucas Dziesinski; Conor O'Neill; Patricia Zheng; Jeffrey C Lotz; Robert P Matthew; Jeannie F Bailey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.721

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.