Literature DB >> 29366552

Mortality in patients sustaining a periprosthetic fracture following a previous extracapsular hip fracture fixation.

T Jennison1, R Yarlagadda2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates following hip fractures are decreasing. As these outcomes improve, it increases the potential for further falls and the potential to sustain a periprosthetic fracture. The aim of this study was to analyse the 1 year mortality of periprosthetic fractures around an implant used to treat an extracapsular hip fracture. Secondary outcomes included 30 day mortality, complications and risk factors associated with mortality.
METHODS: A retrospective case note and radiographic review of all patients who presented to a single institution with a periprosthetic femoral fracture around an implant previously used to treat an extracapsular hip fracture between 1st January and 2008 and 31st May 2015.
RESULTS: 29 patients with a mean age of 75.8. 6 males and 23 females. 20 (69.0%) patients had capacity to consent for surgery. Pre-operatively 34.5% mobilised independently without any walking aids. 79.3% lived at home. 62.1% had a Charlson co-morbidity score of 0 or 1, 27.6% a score of 2 or 3, 6.9% a score of 4 and 5, and 3.4% a score of more than 5.3.4% was ASA grade 1, 13.8% ASA2, 65.5% ASA 3 and 17.2% were ASA 4. The previous implant a dynamic hip screw in 75.9% dynamic hip screws and an intramedullary nail in 24.1%. There were 4 (13.8%) in-patient deaths. The 30 day mortality 17.2% (5 patients) was and the 1 year mortality was 44.8% (13 patients). There were 0 complications that required return to surgery during admission. 1 patient with a revision intramedullary nail had dynamisation performed due to delayed union 7 months following surgery. 1 patient required removal of metalwork 2 years following surgery for infection. When comparing risk factors for mortality, there were no significant risk factors found in this study for 30 day and 1 year mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper suggests that periprosthetic fractures sustained after the surgical treatment of extra capsular neck of femur fractures have higher mortality rates than hip fractures. These patients should be given the same priority as these patients in there management.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracapsular; Hip fracture; Mortality; Periprosthetic fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29366552     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  3 in total

1.  Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower extremities: a case series of 61 fractures.

Authors:  Cody R Perskin; Abhijit Seetharam; Brian H Mullis; Andrew J Marcantonio; John Garfi; Alexander J Ment; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 2.  Does early surgery improve outcomes for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Farrow; A D Ablett; H W Sargeant; T O Smith; A T Johnston
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Periprosthetic tibial fractures in total knee arthroplasty - an outcome analysis of a challenging and underreported surgical issue.

Authors:  Anna Janine Schreiner; Florian Schmidutz; Atesch Ateschrang; Christoph Ihle; Ulrich Stöckle; Björn Gunnar Ochs; Christoph Gonser
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.